4 measurements spanning 8 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,182–2,193 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 21:06
2,183
-1
11 Aug 2026, 03:22
2,184
-8
7 Aug 2026, 20:11
2,192
+3
7 Aug 2026, 07:47
2,189
first reading
Engagement
9 posts held, back to 6 December 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 July 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
9m 43s
Average length
1m 57s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
375 reactions across 9 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 67.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
253
67.5%
❤
68
18.1%
👎
12
3.20%
🔥
10
2.67%
🤡
9
2.40%
😁
8
2.13%
😭
7
1.87%
👏
3
0.8%
🐳
2
0.533%
💔
2
0.533%
🤣
1
0.267%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 375reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 6 December 2022 to 13 July 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
⚡️Cuộc chiến ban đêm ở Marinka.
Một chiến binh với biệt danh Tishina(Im lặng) đã chặn "con chim" của kẻ thù bằng súng chống máy bay không người lái, sau đó mở các vị trí của Lực lượng Vũ trang Ukraine từ máy bay không người lái và "dội bom" kẻ thù.
Vào ban đêm, việc điều hướng trong không gian khi điều khiển máy bay không người lái là vô cùng khó khăn. Ngay cả khi quan sát hình ảnh trong kính ngắm ảnh nhiệt, rất…
🇷🇺🇺🇦 Video từ điện thoại của một người lính Ukraine đã cùng với những người anh em đồng đội của mình chiếm một trong những chiến hào gần Pyatikhatki đã được các công binh của chúng tôi đặt mìn cẩn thận trước.
Một quả mìn MON-50 với khả năng kích nổ từ xa đã được để lại như một món quà cho đối thủ, đó là thứ cuối cùng mà những người lính của Lực lượng Vũ trang Ukraine nhìn thấy trong đời.
Sau khi nổ bẫy, pháo binh…
🇷🇺 Một phần khác của banderamobile Ba Lan bị xé nát trong vùng SVO
Trên khung của xe bọc thép Oshkosh M1083A1P2 MTV mà Lực lượng vũ trang Ukraine sử dụng để kéo lựu pháo "ba trục" M777 và BK(đạn dược) cho chúng.
Tấn công vào trạm biến áp Novoodesskaya ở vùng Odessa
Trong cuộc tấn công lớn vào ban ngày của Lực lượng vũ trang Liên Bang Nga, một số cơ sở hạ tầng năng lượng ở vùng Odessa đã bị tấn công. Một trong số đó là trạm biến áp Novoodesskaya 330 gần làng Mirnoe.
Đánh giá qua bức ảnh, tên lửa chắc chắn đã bắn trúng một trong hai máy biến áp tự động 330/110 kV. Một đám cháy lớn bùng phát tại hiện trường, thiết bị khôn…
Về phía Ukraine, họ một lần nữa tuyên bố công tác phòng không thành công, một số lượng lớn các cơ sở hạ tầng bị ảnh hưởng trên khắp Ukraine và tình trạng mất điện khẩn cấp sắp tới trong thời gian không xác định.
Đoạn phim về vụ pháo kích Donetsk, diễn ra từ nửa đầu ngày. Có người chết và bị thương trong thành phố.
Video: PE "Donetsk", Wargonzo, Donetsk 360, v.v.
👍13❤5
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @chientranhucahpg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@chientranhucahpg named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@no_worthy_news named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“HPG - Chiến tranh U cà 2022” (@chientranhucahpg), 2,183 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chientranhucahpg.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
