5 measurements spanning 7 days, net +14. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,053–3,071 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 00:58
3,069
+2
10 Aug 2026, 23:41
3,067
+11
7 Aug 2026, 18:00
3,056
+1
7 Aug 2026, 00:15
3,055
no change
7 Aug 2026, 00:03
3,055
first reading
Engagement
27 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
27.1%
avg views ÷ 3,069 subscribers
Avg views / post
832
27 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.99%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
27
of 27 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held
27 (29 July 2026 – 7 August 2026)
Views total
22,458
Reactions total
1,120
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 00:00 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
2m 16s
Average length
2m 16s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,120 reactions across 27 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
588
52.5%
🔥
265
23.7%
👍
213
19.0%
😁
16
1.43%
🥰
16
1.43%
❤🔥
6
0.536%
👏
6
0.536%
🎉
5
0.446%
⚡
3
0.268%
🏆
2
0.179%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 27 of the 27 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,120reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
We notice some users want to also trade USDC on their Peniwallet.
We are now adding it as part of our default token list along with WKC, USDT and BNB when you create a new wallet or import an old one.
Changes will appear tomorrow but you can add it now as it has been verified.
Just so you don't think I am lying. This is Peniwallet Data today.
Over $140,000 traded in 24 hours. We average this every single day.
Then there is Peniremit, lool.
Many platforms avoid me because I mention God and because we are a faith based community. Even for the platforms run by Christians.
No matter how big and powerful of a community we get or milestones we achieve or how sophisticated the infrastructure we have built, I don’t get awards neither, does our apps get any form of recognition.
We do volumes in billions. We have the numbers but we are not still in the cool gr…
Peniwallet is a decentralized non-custodial wallet, we can't even swap your funds for you.
The worst we can do is replay stucked notifications from your previous transactions.
We are sorry we didn't inform you before it happened.
Go to sleep, rest assured your funds are safe.
Update on @peniwallet
The issue where some users were seeing transaction notifications on their Peniwallet even though they did not initiate any transactions was caused by previously stuck pending transactions.
During the recent data revamp, all transactions were reverified. Some of these old pending transactions were picked up again by the indexer and reprocessed, which triggered the notifications.
The reprocessi…
The number of wallet holders we are hitting is what marketing teams pay a lot of money for and still don’t achieve it.
Two things God has told me never to pay for as it concerns Wiki Cat is listings and marketing.
So far here are the list of tokens that are verified on @Peniwallet
We will create an explore page on the next version of the peniwallet app so anyone can easy see and buy them.
These developers have also been approved to share 30% of the fees generated from their tokens on peniwallet.
For users who import their tokens to peniwallet, it will automatically appear without them having to add contract address.
Follow…
Auditing your app or smart contract should not cost so much.
As part of SMC developer labs plan, we are starting @smcaudits
We are employing in-house 12 world class blockchain auditors to service all SMC official and waitlist projects for free.
This department will focus on KYC, smart contract audit, penetration testing and security assessment.
Believers
SMC Tutors website is live.
The tutorial team is still uploading our 1,000 tutorial video library but you can visit and test out the website.
We have built our own YouTube so drop a nice comment.
Visit smctutors.com
Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @chiefbeliever. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 198,368 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Sir Mapy” (@chiefbeliever), 3,069 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chiefbeliever.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.