Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 《楚汉阁全拼:@chuhange》—福建资源榜

Channel

《楚汉阁全拼:@chuhange》—福建资源榜

@chgbang

2 usernames

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,013subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 18 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003114702880
TypeChannel
Usernames@abuvkb @chgbang
CreatedBetween 1 September 2025 and 30 November 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded18 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/chgbang

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 79% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,9992,0212,01018 August 2026 — 2,014 subscribers18 August 2026 — 2,014 subscribers22 August 2026 — 2,009 subscribers25 August 2026 — 1,999 subscribers28 August 2026 — 2,005 subscribers31 August 2026 — 2,008 subscribers3 September 2026 — 2,010 subscribers8 September 2026 — 2,018 subscribers12 September 2026 — 2,021 subscribers16 September 2026 — 2,013 subscribers2,01318 August 202616 September 2026
10 measurements spanning 29 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,996–2,024 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 15:212,013-8
12 Sept 2026, 15:392,021+3
8 Sept 2026, 21:202,018+8
3 Sept 2026, 22:182,010+2
31 Aug 2026, 04:082,008+3
28 Aug 2026, 08:342,005+6
25 Aug 2026, 04:081,999-10
22 Aug 2026, 07:272,009-5
18 Aug 2026, 13:262,014no change
18 Aug 2026, 06:462,014first reading

Engagement

5 posts held, back to 8 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

5 reactions across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 27 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

27 Jul 2026, 14:40 UTC≈1,050 viewsread 18 August 2026

中大圈预约流程: 1:我司是会员安排制度(适当筛选真正的客户,有需要会员权益的精准客户。目前会员档位有,288白金会员,888钻石会员,1688至尊会员,5888帝皇至尊。详情了解 会员权益 ) 2:发送需求,客服人员拿取最新资料,提供一下信息:什么时候需要(现在或者是某个时间段的大体精准时间,多次鸽子会取消会员资格。)+预算(2500pp中圈。3000p大圈,5k,1.5w)+需要的次数(大圈的价格多数是次数*单价)+具体省市区 (广东省深圳市宝安区,最好有具体的酒店或者家里位置)+理想的妹子(御姐,少妇,空姐,洋酒,萝莉,身高,体重,罩杯),禁止中圈的价格,大圈极品的要求,没有这种 3:确定了妹子以及距离,安排车车费出发(正常都是100以内,个别100-150) 4:等妹子到达酒店见面,带妹子上楼 满意付款 接受服务 注意事项:飞机上骗子多,没有见面之前,禁止再付款任何费用,有任何问题需要客户自己承担。

18 Jul 2026, 18:17 UTC651 viewsread 18 August 2026

应广大客户要求,花了一个多月时间更新了全国一部分地区的妹子资料 有需要的老板可以看一下: https://t.me/+rV3Ww5L7KSYwODlk 中大圈均需 加会员 ,介意的老板可以多在群里观察 ,欢迎监督!! 目前楚汉阁只做全球中大圈外围,地陪,包养,以及一些明星定制业务。有任何客服以能安排小圈的方式联系各位老板欢迎举报,奖励多多!!! —————楚汉阁运营部

15 Jul 2026, 06:54 UTC744 viewsread 18 August 2026
Photo

#福建 #泉州 #泉州外围 马来西亚混血四 芝名:海琪食 00年大雷妹 163cm 47kg F胸

11 Jul 2026, 09:46 UTC794 viewsread 18 August 2026
Photo

#厦门 #厦门外围 #外围 🌟学生甜美气质校花系短暂停留 • 清纯素颜系 纯欲感天菜 (刚破壳下💦) • 𝐇𝐞𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭身高/168 年龄/07 • 𝐖𝐞𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭体重/49kg • 𝐁𝐮𝐬𝐭胸围/c(天然🐻超软) ⭐️高颜纯欲校花⭐️ 活泼开朗 清纯洋气 初恋气质 乖巧女友感 双商高 听话 细长腿 零风尘感 ✨ *甜美可爱 自然精致 天然无整。 🔥极度敏感易湿 天然0整容🈚️纹身

8 Jul 2026, 07:15 UTC790 views5 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

#福建 #泉州 想要母女的评论打1。🈵30个叫过来 王炸产品🌟母女双飞🉑看户口本 妈妈🌟舌吻69 潮喷 三通 吞精 颜射 164cm 54kg 🐻36C 83 女儿🌟69 配合妈妈撩骚 啪啪 162cm 45kg 🐻B 02 保真母女产品 ~ 人生总得体验 皮肤白嫩 韵味十足 自带体香 床上骚B一对~ 前吹后舔 口活一绝 双龙戏水 口爆 舌吻💋 漫游 毒龙 69互舔👅 主动 不冷场 不偷懒 绝对的体验情绪价值拉满~ 只能双飞不能单约。短期兼职限ViP 妈妈(潮喷 吞精 颜射一起仅需+3 三通+5)

5

Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @chgbang. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“《楚汉阁全拼:@chuhange》—福建资源榜” (@chgbang), 2,013 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chgbang.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.