4 measurements spanning 8 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 992–994 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Aug 2026, 15:29
993
-1
8 Aug 2026, 00:35
994
no change
7 Aug 2026, 23:18
994
+2
7 Aug 2026, 15:57
992
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 2 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
91.7%
avg views ÷ 993 subscribers
Avg views / post
910
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.86%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 19 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held
19 (2 May 2026 – 5 August 2026)
Views total
2,731
Reactions total
78
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 00:35 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
6s
Average length
6s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
123 reactions across 15 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
56
45.5%
😁
32
26.0%
🔥
13
10.6%
🏆
12
9.76%
😭
5
4.07%
👍
4
3.25%
👌
1
0.813%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 123reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 2 May 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 19 we hold a reading for · 16%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @chezap2p. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 May 2026 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Наверное, пришло время рассказать, куда я пропал и чем сейчас занимаюсь.
Сразу скажу: то, чем я занимаюсь сейчас, для меня — скорее перевалочный пункт. Это не история про «дело всей жизни». Я просто жду действительно сильные возможности на рынке, которых пока не вижу.
Почему решил написать этот пост? Чтобы закрыть все слухи и домыслы. Их почему-то вокруг меня всегда было слишком много.
Когда-то я увидел очень прав…
Путин подписал закон о легализации оборота криптовалют в России
Документ вступит в силу 1 сентября. Что изменится:
— Покупать и продавать криптовалюту можно будет через биржи, брокеров, управляющих и обменные сервисы
— Неквалифицированные инвесторы смогут совершать сделки после прохождения тестирования. Лимит — до 300 тысяч рублей в год через одного посредника
— Квалифицированным инвесторам также потребуется тест…
Давно заметил, что этот канал для меня — скорее личный дневник. Мне не важно, сколько человек его читают. Большинство постов я пишу в первую очередь для себя и лишь потом — для небольшого круга людей, которым действительно это интересно.
Есть старая поговорка: если человек действительно зарабатывает, ему не до бесконечной писанины в чатах и каналах. Отчасти это правда. Но сейчас речь не об этом.
Пришло время немног…
Все что вам нужно знать о ByBit.
Биржа активно атакует все каналы связанные с нею через подрядчиков типа Netcraft.
Зачем? Что бы ее блядские поступки не выходили за пределы «жалобы на почту». Терпите, питупишники, терпите.
AML и ошибки новичков
Всем привет, сегодня поговорим про частую ошибку новичков и постараемся донести до читателя, как делать не нужно.
К сожалению, новый пакет санкций сильнейшим образом отразился на российском крипторынке и теперь, все что для нас с вами казалось привычным, приобретает совершенно другой ракурс. Под раздачу попали все, в том числе и известная биржа НТХ.
Последнее время мы часто замечаем, что трей…
Время ломать шаблоны наступило. 🤭
Мы развиваем свою экосистему и с гордостью представляем вам полностью открытое сообщество посвященное p2p заявкам. Своего рода, это чат «Горбушки», только о криптовалютах.
Теперь выгодно покупать/продавать криптовалюту могут не только мерчанты, но и обычные юзеры. Забудьте про вечный поиск предложений на страницах p2p бирж.
Найди свое выгодное и безопасное предложение тут:
https:…
Все ждали и боялись, что 01.06 наши все таки закроют нам доступ к крипте и введут уголовную ответственность. Но запад сработал на опережение, шах и мат, Володька! 😁
Хотя, еще не вечер)
🔥 gate.com - пока-пока.
Gate заявил о закрытии RUB P2P направления
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @chezap2p. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 180,632 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@chezap2p named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@zavodpsp named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Чё за P2P?” (@chezap2p), 993 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chezap2p.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.