5 measurements spanning 10 days, net -35. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,259–5,304 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Aug 2026, 11:38
5,264
-14
14 Aug 2026, 03:18
5,278
-12
11 Aug 2026, 06:33
5,290
-8
8 Aug 2026, 05:30
5,298
-1
7 Aug 2026, 10:15
5,299
first reading
Engagement
33 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
8.21%
avg views ÷ 5,264 subscribers
Avg views / post
432
33 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.25%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
33
of 33 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held
33 (31 July 2026 – 11 August 2026)
Views total
14,266
Reactions total
749
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 04:29 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
14m 02s
Average length
44s
Measured directly from 19 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
749 reactions across 33 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5222275873650015645
355
47.4%
custom 5221990713591361934
130
17.4%
🔥
126
16.8%
👍
29
3.87%
😁
28
3.74%
💔
21
2.80%
❤🔥
11
1.47%
🤗
11
1.47%
🤔
8
1.07%
👏
6
0.801%
🍓
5
0.668%
🕊
3
0.401%
🤩
3
0.401%
⚡
2
0.267%
🌭
2
0.267%
💯
2
0.267%
😍
2
0.267%
🥰
2
0.267%
🌚
1
0.134%
🎄
1
0.134%
1 further kind
1
0.134%
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 33 of the 33 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 749reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 33 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🎵 Как жаль, что розыгрыш прошёл
Но шанс попасть на концерт Браво у вас всё равно есть! Как и на другие выступления в серии летних концертов Red Summer. Билеты на них можно купить за ЧЕ!коины в нашем маркете 👈
Напоминаем, как заработать ЧЕ!коины:
➡️ Смотри любые шоу и реалити от 30 минут — 1 ЧЕ!коин;
➡️ Более 30 минут — 2 ЧЕ!коина;
➡️ Или выиграй 100 ЧЕ!коинов за прохождение викторины по реалити «Охотники» на сайте …
Каково быть единственной девушкой в мужской команде?
Дарья Рубинская делится опытом 💬
Не пропустите новые серии реалити «Охотники»
📅 по будням
2️⃣2️⃣➗3️⃣0️⃣
🥰🥰 в MAX
Если смех продлевает жизнь, то можете пропустить тренировки в выходные 😂
Макс +100500 уже подготовил для вас оздоровительную телепрограмму 😎
Смотри новый выпуск «+100500»
📅 16 августа
2️⃣3️⃣➗0️⃣0️⃣
🥰🥰 в MAX
Помогаем Максу +100500 пополнять коллекцию мемов за всю историю интернета 😎
На фестивале «Вкус лета» мы спросили у стендап-комиков и исполнителей любимых песен, какие мемы они готовы пересматривать бесконечно.
🥰🥰 в MAX
«Охотникам» — 5 лет! 🌟
5 лет поисков, расследований, неожиданных поворотов и охоты за правдой. А теперь пришло время проверить, насколько хорошо ты всё это запомнил.
Сможешь вспомнить самые яркие моменты шоу, узнать детали и пройти квиз на сайте chetv.ru без единой ошибки?
➡️За безупречное прохождение квиза ты получишь 1️⃣0️⃣0️⃣ ЧЕ!коинов и шанс стать «Знатоком ЧЕ!» премии «ЧЕ!ловек года».
Количество попыток не ог…
Showing the 12 most recent of 33 posts we hold for @chetvru. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 276,035 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cross-platform identity — Wikidata
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Телеканал ЧЕ!” (@chetvru), 5,264 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chetvru.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
