Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Чешир

@cheshire_tea

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,470subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001264685604
TypeChannel
Username@cheshire_tea
Created5 February 2018measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/cheshire_tea

Growth

1,4701,4741,4726 August 2026 — 1,474 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,474 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,473 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,471 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,470 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,469–1,475 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 13:161,470-1
10 Aug 2026, 09:121,471-2
7 Aug 2026, 03:451,473-1
6 Aug 2026, 07:461,474no change
6 Aug 2026, 05:011,474first reading

Engagement

7 posts held, back to 13 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
32.4%
avg views ÷ 1,470 subscribers
Avg views / post
476
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.94%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 7 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held7 (13 July 20264 August 2026)
Views total2,379
Reactions total70
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 18:29 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

113 reactions across 7 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5952.2%
😁2421.2%
👍43.54%
🔥43.54%
🤝43.54%
🌚32.65%
💊32.65%
👀21.77%
💯21.77%
🤣21.77%
🤩21.77%
❤‍🔥10.885%
👏10.885%
💔10.885%
😭10.885%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 113reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 20:50 UTC201 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🎵Хелависа — Саламандра 'Поставил демонов в ночную вахту чтоб её не пропустить' Последние дни на репите слушаю эту песню. Фраза очень красивая, я люблю слово wacht и привлекает внимание к фразе ещё и странный синтаксис. Кажется, что Хелависа привыкла к английскому, где можно было б использовать her без двусмысленности, относится ли вот это местоимение к 'вахте' или к 'саламандре': вахта не корабль, вахта — это it.

15

Signed Илья

27 Jul 2026, 18:32 UTC808 views32 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

вчера пикетировал с друзьями в Гааге, у российского посольства, с карикатурами Семена Скрепецкого. ~40 дней назад он был застрелен в Польше, возможно, кадыровцами. Россия даже не обьявила о расследовании смерти своего гражданина: там боятся выйти на самих себя, совершенно понятно. Yesterday I and my friends made our small meeting, against the Russian Embassy, in Den Haag, with caricatures of killed Semyon Skrepetsk

22💊3💯2🤩2👍1💔1😭1

Signed Илья

22 Jul 2026, 15:12 UTC551 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

В 'Острове Мёртвых' Бёклина важно ощущение движения — движения ладьи, на неподвижной водной глади, к величественно-непонятному острову Смерти. Лишь, когда я стал жить недалеко от Германии, я понял, что силуэт кипарисов, неожиданно показающийся вдали, часто кажется похожим на башню готического храма даже в реальной жизни. А целый большой храм издалека легко принять за груды камня (скалы). Особенно усталым, в сумерках

13

Signed Илья

17 Jul 2026, 09:57 UTC527 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

'Воображаемые сообщества' Бенедикта Андерсена заметка к завтрашней встрече в книжном клубе Амстердама. Популярная книга подробно повествует о возникновении, инструментах и становлении ругаемого автором национализма (национального самосознания, идентификации себя через нацию) в Новое Время — прежде всего, в обоих Америках, Европе. Также во Вьетнаме, Сиаме, Японии и др. Про Африку кстати сравнительно мало. Европе на

👍3👀2🤣21👏1

Signed Илья

17 Jul 2026, 09:56 UTC292 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Benedict Anderson's Imagined Communities This famous political philosopher told in details about beginning, tools and development of nationalism in the Modern Era—mainly in both Americas and Europe, but also in Vietnam, Siam, Japan etc. Unfortunately Africa received not much attention. In Europe, nationalism became essential due to Protestantism, religious wars, and Spread of Printing (moreover, often books were pri

🌚1

Signed Илья

15 Jul 2026, 20:35 UTC382 views32 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

— А это нормально, что после твоего чая у меня руки трясутся? — А нормально то, что ты вчера по новостям видел?.. — …Наливай… L. Sid. — Is it normal that my hands are shaking after your tea? — Is it normal what you see in recent news? — …One more cup, please.

😁24🤝4🌚21❤‍🔥1

13 Jul 2026, 18:29 UTC363 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @odnasoprano

Холодные небеса Уильям Батлер Йейтс, перевод мой Я поднял вгляд: восторг грачиных крыл горел на небесах и обращался льдом. И я сходил с ума – всё, чем когда-то был, как и любая мысль об этом и о том изчезло, утекло, оставив за собой ожог воспоминаний: как любил, был юн. Я виноват, но в этом смысла нет, есть только боль, и я кричу, дрожу, едва стою, сражённый светом. Призрак снова здесь, стряхнув одежды смерти, о

7🔥4

Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @cheshire_tea. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 790,816 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Чешир” (@cheshire_tea), 1,470 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cheshire_tea.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.