Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Паричок Червятина

@chervpari

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

1,313subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003580450266
TypeChannel
Username@chervpari
DescriptionВсе совпадения случайны, а персонажи вымышлены
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/chervpari

Growth

1,3137 Aug 2026, 18:21 — 1,313 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 22:32 — 1,313 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 18:217 Aug 2026, 22:32
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,312–1,314 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 22:321,313no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:211,313first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 31 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
86
Videos
38
Links
24

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
1m 26s
Average length
22s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

226 reactions across 14 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 15.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍3415.0%
🔥3314.6%
3214.2%
🤣2812.4%
🎉167.08%
🤔135.75%
🤝125.31%
🤬125.31%
💩104.42%
🤡93.98%
👏73.10%
😭62.65%
👀52.21%
💯52.21%
🏆20.885%
👎20.885%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 226reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 31 May 2026 to 14 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

14 Jul 2026, 05:31 UTC≈1,030 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Щас бы на рыбалку, а не вот это все!

👍2

5 Jul 2026, 08:33 UTC≈1,790 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Шелепова в мэры, что думаете, земляки!?

  1. Да, отличный будет глава!16%
  2. Нет, что за бред!84%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

5 Jul 2026, 08:31 UTC≈1,230 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @zheleznogorskgovorunPhoto

Влажным мечтам Плова сбыться не суждено. В очередной раз будущий мэр Нашгорода направился в пешее эротическое путешествие! В этот раз из утешительных бенефитов он получил возможность постоять рядом с настоящим Сергеем Александровичем

🤡9👍3💩3👏2🤣21

4 Jul 2026, 07:22 UTC≈1,330 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @AVKuleshVideo

Video, posted without a caption

🔥11👍8

4 Jul 2026, 07:22 UTC≈1,100 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Вот это поворот! Кулеш сумел таки выдвинуться, да еще и от Единой России, обнулив тем самым краевые амбиции Шелепова. А Красноярский край сумел тем самым продемонстрировать суверенитет сразу двум госкорпорациям. Концептуально

🔥12👍8👏1

25 Jun 2026, 11:55 UTC≈1,300 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Такое вот мнение из Красноярска репостят коллеги из @говоруна, но у них закрыты комментарии) а как будто есть что обсуждать:

2👎1🔥1

25 Jun 2026, 11:55 UTC≈1,470 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @NeNASHIPhoto

Железногорский городской суд обязал администрацию ЗАТО г.Железногорск в течение 2-х лет ликвидировать несанкционированную свалку отходов производства и потребления в районе гаражного кооператива № 64 по ул. Привокзальная. Причём делать это (ликвидировать свалку) муниципальной администрации придётся за свой счёт - т.е. за счёт муниципального бюджета: ✔️...суд пришел к выводу, что оснований для предоставления Админист

🔥32

20 Jun 2026, 10:33 UTC≈1,540 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Повышаем удои в Додоново

7🔥2

16 Jun 2026, 10:51 UTC≈2,270 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @AVKuleshPhoto

Миллионы рублей, выброшенные, буквально, в помойку. Та самая свалка под Железногорском, которая видна на снимках из космоса, и на уборку которой потрачены миллионы рублей из краевого бюджета (за злоупотребления которыми находятся под арестом уже двое чиновников администрации Железногорска) снова "процветает". Свалка на месте бывшего песчаного карьера по дороге к лагерю "Орбита" и к 42-м садам снова неумолимо наполня

💩7😭5

16 Jun 2026, 10:51 UTC≈1,510 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Алексей Викторович Кулеш продолжает натурально депутатствовать. Фантомные боли или назло филиалу Росатома пойдет в Законодательное Собрание по региональному списку? А то может и по Желеногорскому округу, но от партии «Новые Люди», даром что ли чуть не каждые выходные с Грибоедовым Денисом Тереховым на Столбах лазит… Очевидно ясность возникнет после региональной парт конференции Единой России, намеченной на 20ое июня.

👀5🏆2🤔2

15 Jun 2026, 09:27 UTC≈3,000 views35 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Вслед за новостями о развитии уголовного дела Николая Алексеевича Тестоедова, уважаемого, подоспели вести о судьбе его любимого партнера по рыбалке, Светланы Ивановны Башковой, дорогой. Некогда повелительница всея АО «ИСС», получила 3,5 года реального срока! За баннер! Который сдала в аренду сама себе. Суд приговорил ее к реальному сроку, назначил штраф 500 000 да еще и возмещение ущерба к взысканию на 1,5 миллиона.

🎉15👍10🔥42🤣2👎1😭1

9 Jun 2026, 08:54 UTC≈2,030 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Человечество испокон веков мечтало о вечных хранилищах. Египтяне строили пирамиды. Росатом строит ПЗРО — Пункт глубинного захоронения радиоактивных отходов у Железногорска, в гнейсах Нижнеканского массива, которым три миллиарда лет. Порода древняя. Стройка — тоже. Идея родилась в нулевых, в постановление Правительства оформилась в 2012-м, стройку ПИЛ — подземной исследовательской лаборатории, первого этапа проекта,

🤔11👍3🤣32

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @chervpari. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

5 Jul 2026, 08:33 UTCAnonymous Poll245 voters

Шелепова в мэры, что думаете, земляки!?

  1. Да, отличный будет глава!16%
  2. Нет, что за бред!84%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 31 May 2026 to 14 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Паричок Червятина” (@chervpari), 1,313 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chervpari.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.