Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ПЕРЕЕЗД: @elixx_hq

Channel

ПЕРЕЕЗД: @elixx_hq

@cherrysanrii

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

93subscribers

-19 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003824538881
TypeChannel
Username@cherrysanrii
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live31 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 31 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/cherrysanrii

Growth

93116104.58 August 2026 — 112 subscribers9 August 2026 — 110 subscribers9 August 2026 — 110 subscribers17 August 2026 — 116 subscribers24 August 2026 — 98 subscribers31 August 2026 — 93 subscribers8 August 202631 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 22 days, net -19. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 90–119 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
31 Aug 2026, 03:2493-5
24 Aug 2026, 23:3298-18
17 Aug 2026, 11:55116+6
9 Aug 2026, 07:16110no change
9 Aug 2026, 03:52110-2
8 Aug 2026, 17:15112first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 7 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
37.0%
avg views ÷ 93 subscribers
Avg views / post
34.4
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
12.3%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 14 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 12 of 14 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held14 (7 August 20269 August 2026)
Views total482
Reactions total53
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 07:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
8s
Average length
8s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

53 reactions across 12 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💘1324.5%
custom 52963894169929397181018.9%
custom 5296744563543677100917.0%
custom 5296654184546867893611.3%
custom 529638400103917930659.43%
custom 613890834371812413235.66%
custom 529666402002197775523.77%
custom 529678308510535711623.77%
custom 529650234027308595911.89%
custom 534845048511427676211.89%
🍓11.89%

Custom emoji. 9 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 53 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
13
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 14 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
13
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @cherrysanrii. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 August 2026 to 9 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 04:49 UTC11 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Poll

~Во что играть будем🤩🤩🤩

  1. Ассоциация43%
  2. Ваша ос как43%
  3. Ос по0%
  4. Хуманизация14%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

💘2

Signed 𓈒 ◌ 𓆩𓆩 ֺ︩ℱ𝘳𝘦𝘺 ⠂୧ 𓈒‿ 🩷 。꒱ #🪽 #яквантоваячастица

8 Aug 2026, 20:41 UTC20 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Фоточки с лагеря. Не было времени нормально сфоткаться. Оценивайте любимые #Lolikz

custom 52963894169929397183💘1custom 52966541845468678931custom 52967445635436771001custom 52967830851053571161custom 61389083437181241321

Signed •#Littelfoxeex# #/Loliz# #𝕯𝖆𝖓𝖗 #Eli #Сода

8 Aug 2026, 20:14 UTC78 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Вот ещё вкусняшка - моделька. Но к сожалению отказались её брать ну или можно сказать что отменили заказ :( Было грустно, но в лагере во время сон часа заниматься кроме как играть в карты нечем и поэтому рисовала #Lolikz

💘1custom 52963840010391793061custom 52966541845468678931custom 52967830851053571161

Signed •#Littelfoxeex# #/Loliz# #𝕯𝖆𝖓𝖗 #Eli #Сода

8 Aug 2026, 20:11 UTC78 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Ребятуси, я была в лагере. Вот вам вкусняшка☺️ Скоро будет еще вкусняшка - целых две #Lolikz

custom 52963894169929397181custom 52966541845468678931custom 52967445635436771001

Signed •#Littelfoxeex# #/Loliz# #𝕯𝖆𝖓𝖗 #Eli #Сода

8 Aug 2026, 19:59 UTC20 views2 reactions13 Starsread 9 August 2026

Ребятуси, мне щас пришло в голову вообще сделать переезд и снова начать заново: поменять ник и всё такое.. 😰 Хотя можно бы и без переезда обойтись. #Санриичка

💘1custom 52967445635436771001

Signed ໒꒰ྀིっ𓈒aw sanrii #as

8 Aug 2026, 10:46 UTC25 viewsread 9 August 2026
Poll

~Во что играем💓

  1. Смайлики/Баскетбол/Слова/Столбец0%
  2. Палитра/Свадьба/Лесенка/Угадай гачера20%
  3. Противоположный пол/Мазохист и садист/Ангел\Демон/Реакция админа на вашу ос0%
  4. Свидание/Шип с админом/Шип между пдп/Примеряю вашу одежду\палитру20%
  5. Редизайн/Слепой художник/Обработай/Из говняшки в няшку10%
  6. Убийство/Причина смерти/Детство/Профессия10%
  7. Вышибалы/Оценка ос/Альфа\Омега/Поцелуй\Пощечина0%
  8. Ассоциации/Ваша ос как/Ос по/Хуманизация40%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Signed 𓈒 ◌ 𓆩𓆩 ֺ︩ℱ𝘳𝘦𝘺 ⠂୧ 𓈒‿ 🩷 。꒱ #🪽 #яквантоваячастица

8 Aug 2026, 07:46 UTC26 viewsread 9 August 2026
Poll

~Хотите поиграть с Фреей💓

  1. 💓💓78%
  2. 💓💓💓22%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Signed 𓈒 ◌ 𓆩𓆩 ֺ︩ℱ𝘳𝘦𝘺 ⠂୧ 𓈒‿ 🩷 。꒱ #🪽 #яквантоваячастица

8 Aug 2026, 04:23 UTC31 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

💓💓💓💓💓💓💓💓💓 🤩🤩так красиво получилось, 🤩🤩но отпилить придётся половину😭 🍓🍓🍓🍓🍓🍓🍓🍓🍓🍓🍓 ⭐️⭐️ #Фρᥱя #ᥲдⲙᥙн 🤩🤩🤩 #ᴦᥲчᥲ #᧐δρᥲδ᧐ᴛκᥲ ⭐️🤩🤩🤩 ⭐️⭐️ #ᥴᥰ᧐ᥔ᧘ᥱρ ⭐️ 🤩🤩🤩

custom 52963840010391793064custom 61389083437181241322custom 52963894169929397181

Signed 𓈒 ◌ 𓆩𓆩 ֺ︩ℱ𝘳𝘦𝘺 ⠂୧ 𓈒‿ 🩷 。꒱ #🪽 #яквантоваячастица

7 Aug 2026, 14:39 UTC32 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Poll

Стоит ли?

  1. Дап🕷64%
  2. Не, не надо🕷36%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

custom 52966541845468678932

Signed ໒꒰ྀིっ𓈒aw sanrii #as

7 Aug 2026, 14:37 UTC31 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Ребят, я думаю может ещё принимать заказы за робуксы.. Они мне тоже очень пригодятся 😊 #Санриичка

custom 52963894169929397183

Signed ໒꒰ྀིっ𓈒aw sanrii #as

7 Aug 2026, 13:42 UTC33 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

💓💓💓💓💓💓💓💓💓 ⭐️—пока обру рисовала🩷🩷 понравилось как глазки🩷🩷 ⭐️⭐️получились🐰 ⭐️⭐️⭐️ #Фρᥱя #ᥲдⲙᥙн #ᴦᥲчᥲ #᧐δρᥲδ᧐ᴛκᥲ ⭐️⭐️⭐️ #ᥴᥰ᧐ᥔ᧘ᥱρ ⭐️ 🤩🤩🤩 🎀➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖

💘1custom 52963894169929397181custom 52966541845468678931custom 53484504851142767621

Signed 𓈒 ◌ 𓆩𓆩 ֺ︩ℱ𝘳𝘦𝘺 ⠂୧ 𓈒‿ 🩷 。꒱ #🪽 #яквантоваячастица

7 Aug 2026, 09:43 UTC32 views14 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Вот. #Санриичка

💘5custom 52967445635436771004custom 52966640200219777552🍓1custom 52963894169929397181custom 52965023402730859591

Signed ໒꒰ྀིっ𓈒aw sanrii #as

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @cherrysanrii. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

9 Aug 2026, 04:49 UTCAnonymous Poll7 voters

~Во что играть будем🤩🤩🤩

  1. Ассоциация43%
  2. Ваша ос как43%
  3. Ос по0%
  4. Хуманизация14%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

8 Aug 2026, 10:46 UTCAnonymous Poll10 voters

~Во что играем💓

  1. Смайлики/Баскетбол/Слова/Столбец0%
  2. Палитра/Свадьба/Лесенка/Угадай гачера20%
  3. Противоположный пол/Мазохист и садист/Ангел\Демон/Реакция админа на вашу ос0%
  4. Свидание/Шип с админом/Шип между пдп/Примеряю вашу одежду\палитру20%
  5. Редизайн/Слепой художник/Обработай/Из говняшки в няшку10%
  6. Убийство/Причина смерти/Детство/Профессия10%
  7. Вышибалы/Оценка ос/Альфа\Омега/Поцелуй\Пощечина0%
  8. Ассоциации/Ваша ос как/Ос по/Хуманизация40%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

8 Aug 2026, 07:46 UTCAnonymous Poll9 voters

~Хотите поиграть с Фреей💓

  1. 💓💓78%
  2. 💓💓💓22%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

7 Aug 2026, 14:39 UTCAnonymous Poll11 voters

Стоит ли?

  1. Дап🕷64%
  2. Не, не надо🕷36%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 9 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 538,780 of 1,629,452 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ПЕРЕЕЗД: @elixx_hq” (@cherrysanrii), 93 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cherrysanrii.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.