Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for @4ere6nya

Channel

@4ere6nya

@chere6nya_tg

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

3,397subscribers

+23 since we began measuring on 29 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001544912889
TypeChannel
Username@chere6nya_tg
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded29 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/chere6nya_tg

Topic

Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 72% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

3,3713,3993,38529 August 2026 — 3,374 subscribers30 August 2026 — 3,374 subscribers1 September 2026 — 3,371 subscribers5 September 2026 — 3,399 subscribers10 September 2026 — 3,396 subscribers14 September 2026 — 3,397 subscribers3,39729 August 202614 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 16 days, net +23. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,367–3,403 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Sept 2026, 10:383,397+1
10 Sept 2026, 21:393,396-3
5 Sept 2026, 12:573,399+28
1 Sept 2026, 16:543,371-3
30 Aug 2026, 03:243,374no change
29 Aug 2026, 10:453,374first reading

Engagement

8 posts held, back to 12 November 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 56s
Average length
2m 56s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,782 reactions across 8 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
82646.4%
👍43524.4%
🔥40622.8%
🎉975.44%
🥰150.842%
🤩20.112%
👏10.056%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,782 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 12 November 2025 to 27 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 8 we hold a reading for · 13%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @chere6nya_tg. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 8 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 12 November 2025 to 27 December 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

27 Dec 2025, 15:05 UTC≈3,600 views148 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Не знаю, как вы, а я на новогодних каникулах планирую много читать. Сейчас с огромным удовольствием смакую книгу Роберта Маккаммона - «Жизнь мальчишки», заявлена, как хоррор, но скорее про жизнь с элементами мистики. Очень вкусно пишет, переводчикам отдельное спасибо. Сразу отложила и вторую книгу автора. И еще несколько. Расскажите, что в книжном меню у вас?

111🔥26👍11

18 Dec 2025, 05:29 UTC≈4,220 views494 reactions1 Starread 29 August 2026
Photo

🔡🔡 - это когда постишь фото только после одобрения, 🔡🔡 - это когда прислушиваешься к мыслям и идеям и зачастую они креативнее и интереснее твоих, 🔡🔡 - это когда ты слово, а тебе в ответ 20, 🔡🔡 - это когда твоя косметика уже не совсем твоя, 🔡🔡 - это когда можно говорить на одном языке, без «перевода» и упрощения, 🔡🔡 - это когда ты уже и безнадежно отстал, 🔡🔡 - это когда свои тайны и секреты, своя маленькая жизнь, 🔡🔡 -

🔥258137🎉97🤩2

17 Dec 2025, 17:14 UTC≈3,300 views152 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Интересную книгу читаю в последние дни. Она не про демонизацию гаджетов, а про цифровую свободу и цифровую осознанность со множеством практических советов (до них пока не дошла, немного разворотов в комментариях).

113🔥39

24 Nov 2025, 08:46 UTC≈4,670 views164 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

В процессе поиска фильмов и книг о личности Ивана IV удивлялась их малому количеству. И взрослых немного, детские почти отсутствуют. Вот то, что удалось найти: 1. «Корсары Ивана Грозного», К. Бадигин. Исторический роман "Корсары Ивана Грозного" рассказывает о годах правления Ивана Грозного, отмеченных упорной борьбой за выход в Балтийское море, открывающий путь к свободной торговле и процветанию державы. На страницах

119🔥32👍12👏1

23 Nov 2025, 08:30 UTC≈4,230 views286 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

История России началась в 7-м классе с неоднозначной и объемной личности Ивана Грозного. Собрала для нас с Сашей дополнительный материал, будем изучать и формировать мнение на основе разных источников. ИСТОРИЧЕСКАЯ ЧАСТЬ: 1. https://youtu.be/bsmq7hjxaY0 видео проекта Star Media из цикла «XVI век. Русская История» - «Иван Грозный: десятилетие реформ». 2. https://youtu.be/5cjHktM5ZK0 Лекция Игоря Данилевского из цикла

204👍50🔥32

Signed Evgenia @4ere6nya

18 Nov 2025, 07:31 UTC≈3,970 views165 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Доброе утро, друзья! 😏 Вы знаете, что на моей странице практически нет рекламы, особенно личных блогов и каналов, но сегодня — моя самая искренняя рекомендация для всех, в первую очередь для мам девочек (а так же тех, у кого в семье есть девочки от рождения до 99+ лет 🤭). Ирина Васильевна Караченцева — детский доктор — главный детский гинеколог Москвы и трижды мама, делится огромнейшим количеством полезной информации

👍8962🔥14

Signed Evgenia @4ere6nya

16 Nov 2025, 15:36 UTC≈3,640 views263 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

❗️ Горячие рекомендации от нас с Сашей для ваших +/- семиклассников. Замечательны все книги этой серии, но первые были совсем просты для Саши, поэтому, несколько занудны. А тут все сложные темы - склонение причастий, причастный оборот, действительные/страдательные, правописание суффиксов, НЕ с причастиями, н и нн в отглагольных прилагательных, НЕ с деепричастиями, деепричастия несовершенного вида, морфологические раз

👍17469🥰15🔥5

Signed Evgenia @4ere6nya

12 Nov 2025, 11:02 UTC≈4,410 views110 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video

Спасибо, что пользуетесь - @SaveAsBot'ом

👍9911

Signed Evgenia @4ere6nya

Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @chere6nya_tg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

UletimRU - о путешествиях и не только
@uletimru · 41,853
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 29 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“@4ere6nya” (@chere6nya_tg), 3,397 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chere6nya_tg.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.