Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ЧЕРДАК ЧЕРТАНОВА😎

Channel

ЧЕРДАК ЧЕРТАНОВА😎

@cherdakchertanova

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

86subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003764872636
TypeChannel
Username@cherdakchertanova
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/cherdakchertanova

Growth

838684.56 August 2026 — 83 subscribers9 August 2026 — 83 subscribers16 August 2026 — 86 subscribers6 August 202616 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 9 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 83–86 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 03:0886+3
9 Aug 2026, 17:4583no change
6 Aug 2026, 21:1883first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
60.2%
avg views ÷ 86 subscribers
Avg views / post
51.7
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
22.3%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held15 (31 July 20269 August 2026)
Views total776
Reactions total173
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 17:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

173 reactions across 15 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
8549.1%
🔥6034.7%
👍116.36%
💔105.78%
❤‍🔥31.73%
🤩31.73%
🫡10.578%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 173reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 13:56 UTC26 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026

NEW! ЗАМЕЧАТЕЛЬНЫЕ ЛЮДИ (продолжение) Этап 2. Представьте, что вы купили большой гараж, в котором никогда не было машины, а лет 70 сваливали туда без разбору всякий хлам. А еще принесли из дому абсолютно всю одежду, посуду, мебель, книжки, картины, корзинки, картонки и все это вилами и лопатами перемешали с железным хламом и в завершение вылили сверху 10 ведер краски и клея. Вот такое что-то у меня получается по

8

7 Aug 2026, 13:09 UTC41 views14 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Стащила у мужа ноутбук и пишу дальше, пока есть возможность, продолжу о понимании героя. Трудней всего было, как ни странно, с Дарвином. Он был ну натурально святой человек (как его, атеиста, назвал после его смерти архиепископ Кентерберийский). Жену и детей обожал, ни с кем не ссорился, не то что подлого, а плохого поступка никогда не сделал. Неживой получался. Писать надо не про ангелов, а про людей. Я и там и с

🔥13👍1

7 Aug 2026, 07:42 UTC41 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Все-таки набирала на телефоне , прошу прощения за опечатки

7🤩2

7 Aug 2026, 07:39 UTC40 views16 reactionsread 9 August 2026

NEW! ЗАМЕЧАТЕЛЬНЫЕ ЛЮДИ ( продолжение) В случае, когда автор берется писать документальную книгу «с нуля», общий принцип примерно такой: 1/2 часть времени на сбор и организацию материала, 1/2 на писание книжки. В «Молодой гвардии» договор заключался на год. Я укладывалась в 11 месяцев, чтоб выкроить отпуск, и было у меня примерно так: 2 месяца - сбор информации хаотический, 5 месяцев - организация материала,

🔥106

6 Aug 2026, 10:01 UTC48 views10 reactionsread 9 August 2026

У меня сдох комп а писать длинные посты в телефоне мне трудно из-за зрения. Простите, друзья.,😭Мастер придет ко мне в воскресенье

💔10

5 Aug 2026, 19:52 UTC49 views16 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

И вот я лезу в Википедию (пока что ни в коем случае не в солидные книги, хотя они у меня есть) и начинаю хоть что-то узнавать. Для начала хотя бы когда герой родился, учился, женился или воевал. И дальше я как бы совещаюсь с читателем, предлагаю поразмышлять: а может, то-то произошло в жизни героя потому-то? Есть здесь связь или нет? Вроде да... Но вот тут один фактик что-то с остальными не очень вяжется - почему так

12❤‍🔥2🔥2

5 Aug 2026, 19:52 UTC46 views17 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

ЗАМЕЧАТЕЛЬНЫЕ ЛЮДИ Похвалюсь маленько: почти все мои книги в серии ЖЗЛ называли словом «канон» (именно для этой серии; это не академические работы, хотя мне бы хотелось когда-нибудь написать что-то академическое). А вот метод, каким я работала, каноническим уж точно нельзя назвать. Нормальные авторы в ЖЗЛ когда-то по своей работе фундаментально изучили жизнь героя - историки, журналисты, науковеды, музыковеды, ли

12👍2🔥2🤩1

4 Aug 2026, 13:55 UTC60 views12 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Сегодня поста, наверное, не будет - какой-то завал с работой. Вместо него - АНОНС: завтра-послезавтра по предложению Анны Соколовой буду рассказывать, как пишутся биографические ( и вообще документальные) книги. Может, это мало кому из вас нужно, но постараюсь, чтобы было интересно😍

9👍3

3 Aug 2026, 14:57 UTC67 views16 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Маленькое техническое объявление Уважаемые подписчики❤️, обращаюсь к тем из вас, с кем мы сейчас работаем, и с кем, возможно, поработаем в будущем! Хочу объяснить, почему я всех прошу присылать «домашнее задание» накануне консультации (в крайнем случае - утром, если консультация вечером). Дело в том, что писательский думательный процесс - не полностью управляемый. Я прочитала текст или другое задание, какие-то мы

12🔥3🫡1

2 Aug 2026, 10:07 UTC57 views11 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

А вот и второй сборник коллектива авторов "Ризома". "66 похитителей снов" - это 66 рассказов о страшном и таинственном. Из сборников Ризомы это мой любимый.

🔥92

1 Aug 2026, 09:23 UTC64 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026

А вот - теория, если нужно. Я выбрала эту ссылку из первых попавшихся. Тут всё излагается очень разумно. https://zigzag-24.ru/blog/povestvovanie-ot-tretego-litsa-eto-kak/?utm_referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2F

🔥3👍1

1 Aug 2026, 08:57 UTC65 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Окончательный вариант: »Дэвид моргнул и снова увидел перед собой тоннель. Свет полосами падал на капот — лампа, провал, лампа. Он пошевелился в кресле, и ремень безопасности натянулся на груди — Дэвид почувствовал собственное тело: тяжесть рук на руле, затекшие ноги, прохладный воздух, касавшийся лица. Между тусклыми лампами исчезли Женева, Софи, проигранный тендер. Остались только камень, движение машины и он. <..

👍4🔥3

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @cherdakchertanova. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 710,582 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ЧЕРДАК ЧЕРТАНОВА😎” (@cherdakchertanova), 86 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cherdakchertanova.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.