Channel
@cherchezMila
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
999subscribers
+8 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001898488829 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cherchezMila |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cherchezMila |
Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Oct 2026, 09:42 | 999 | -1 |
| 26 Sept 2026, 21:40 | 1,000 | -5 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 02:40 | 1,005 | +3 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 00:37 | 1,002 | +2 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 01:57 | 1,000 | +2 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 18:15 | 998 | +2 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 05:36 | 996 | +2 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 18:42 | 994 | +3 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 07:41 | 991 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 20:45 | 991 | first reading |
5 posts held, back to 9 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
82 reactions across 5 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 68.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 56 | 68.3% | |
| 😱 | 8 | 9.76% | |
| 🤯 | 5 | 6.10% | |
| 🤝 | 4 | 4.88% | |
| 🥰 | 4 | 4.88% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 3.66% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 1.22% | |
| 💘 | 1 | 1.22% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 82 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 9 August 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Увеличение губ С губами была целая эпопея. Сейчас расскажу, учитесь на моих ошибках 😂🧚♀️ 2020 год Я ещё с 1 курса универа хотела их сделать, но переживала, что губы создадут эффект типичной кавказской бомбиты. В итоге всё-таки решилась, сделали очень красиво и аккуратно, как я хотела. 2021 год Я пришла на повторное увеличение, потому что гель рассосался. Пошла к тому же косметологу, поэтому вообще не контролировал…
❤11😱8🤯5
Вау-препарат от отеков лица Спешу к вам с отзывом спустя неделю 🤍 Я вообще редкий гость в кабинете косметолога, убеждена в двух вещах: чем меньше вмешательств, тем лучше чем позже начинаете, тем лучше Хожу 1–2 раза в год, делаю биоревитализацию на Мезоксантине, рассказывала вам. Обожаю его за лифтинг, увлажнение и сияние В этот раз моя любимая фея-косметолог предложила попробовать новый препарат с интересным соста…
❤7👍1
Кто-нибудь пользовался карандашами для губ от trixy? Они сейчас активно на рекламе у блогеров, сперва меня это смутило… Но я так ведусь на красивую упаковку, что пройти мимо не смогла. Стильный дизайн, гелевая текстура, выдвижной механизм, так еще и стойкий карандаш — заказ оформлен, ждем карандаши🤣 Единственное, я долго выбирала оттенки, тк на фото в отзывах они заметно отличаются. Взяла warm latte, velvet nude и …
❤6🤝4🔥3
Очень вкусный хлеб на Ozon fresh🩵 Именно из раздела «печем сами» я заказываю рано утром, разбирают быстро, он всегда свежеиспеченный! Самые топ: • тосканский [ссылочка] • чиабатта [ссылочка] • тартин деревенский [ссылочка] • цельнозерновой [ссылочка]
❤6🥰4💘1
Покрасила волосы, не нарадуюсь! Я сейчас на родине, времени зря не теряю…все бьюти-процедуры делаю на Кавказе! Сделали нейтральное осветление прядей по верхнему слою, затем затонировались. Очень долго откладывала это дело, сильно переживала тк не могла найти стилиста по волосам, которому могла бы довериться. Мне мало наличия красивых работ, должен сложиться какой-то необъяснимый мэтч…как правило, я сразу понимаю, мо…
❤26
Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @cherchezMila. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ищите Милу” (@cherchezMila), 999 subscribers as measured 5 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cherchezMila.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.