28 Apr 2026, 13:04 UTC98 viewsread 13 August 2026
此ID用户名出售，购买关注 @G2222
Channel
7
@chengshi
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
6subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002464909674 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @chengshi |
| Created | 27 January 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/chengshi |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 14:43 | 6 | +1 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 01:03 | 5 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 12:05 | 5 | first reading |
Engagement
9 posts held, back to 27 January 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 27 January 2025 to 28 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
27 Dec 2025, 13:38 UTC133 viewsread 13 August 2026
诚实｜真实记录（筹划中） 这里不迎合立场， 不制造情绪， 不为了流量编故事。 只做三件事： • 记录已经发生的事实 • 标注尚未确认的部分 • 给出清晰、克制的判断 不保证你喜欢， 只保证我尽量诚实。 如果有新的事实，会更新。
27 Dec 2025, 13:37 UTC126 views1 reactionsread 13 August 2026
【诚实记录】关于“真相”这件事 很多人问： 你站哪一边？ 我的答案一直只有一个： 我站在事实这一边。 事实有时候很冷， 也可能不完整， 甚至会让人不舒服。 但比起被操控的情绪， 我更愿意把已经确认的事情， 一条一条摆出来。 在这里： • 已确认的，我会明确写明 • 未确认的，我会标注来源 • 猜测和判断，会清楚区分 你可以不同意， 但至少知道事情本来的样子。 如果你在寻找立场， 这里可能不适合你。 如果你在寻找真实， 欢迎留下。 —— 诚实
🔥1
26 Apr 2025, 10:41 UTC154 viewsread 13 August 2026
此ID用户名出售，购买关注 @G2222
4 Apr 2025, 06:22 UTC167 viewsread 13 August 2026
诚实就如埋藏在泥土里面的果实，谎言犹如枝头上妖艳的花朵。虽然谎言能给人暂时的美感，但它的枯萎是不可避免的，而诚实会在那里生根发芽。 立身必须以诚信为本，诚实是人生的命脉，是一切价值的根基。 以诚待人, 心如明镜, 不欺不瞒, 方显人品 诚实守信是人生的底线, 言行一致方能赢得尊重 一诺值千金, 诚信是立人之本 真诚如同明灯, 照亮你我心间 诚实是金, 贵在无价之宝 心怀坦诚,世界亦对你坦诚相待 秉持真心,方能领悟生活真谛 诚实如星, 闪耀如钻 言语不必华丽, 但心意需真诚 待人以真诚, 心也坦然；处事以诚实, 路自宽广 诚实的言语, 虽简单却掷地有声, 直击心灵深处 诚实而无为,是平庸的标识; 然而伪善而多谋,却是灵魂的瑕疵 以诚待人, 是心灵的开放, 是情感的交融, 更是人格的彰显 诚实是心灵的契约, 守信是人际交往的基石 信誉如生命般珍贵, 诚实是维护它的不二法则 诚实如光, 照亮人心, 温…
23 Feb 2025, 04:04 UTC108 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo
Photo, posted without a caption
1 Feb 2025, 23:27 UTC149 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo
Photo, posted without a caption
1 Feb 2025, 07:52 UTCviews —
Channel name was changed to «Username: @chengshi»
27 Jan 2025, 08:51 UTCviews —
Channel created
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @chengshi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 906,491 of 1,585,237entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“7” (@chengshi), 6 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chengshi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.