Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Chemp_admin1

Channel

Chemp_admin1

@chemp_admin1

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

2subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001695319745
TypeChannel
Username@chemp_admin1
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded14 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/chemp_admin1

Growth

213 Aug 2026, 04:33 — 2 subscribers14 Aug 2026, 07:32 — 2 subscribers13 Aug 2026, 04:3314 Aug 2026, 07:32
2 measurements spanning 1 day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1–3 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 07:322no change
13 Aug 2026, 04:332first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 4 December 2023the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 May 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
18
Videos
1

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
2m 04s
Average length
2m 04s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

44 reactions across 14 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥2147.7%
🌚1636.4%
🏆511.4%
👍12.27%
👎12.27%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 44reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 4 December 2023 to 22 May 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

22 May 2024, 22:04 UTCviews —

Chemp_admin1 pinned «Ism: Tel: user : @chemp_admin1 Real Team ⚔️ Eagle team ⚔️ Starbucks team 🗡 Assalomu Aleykum hammaga qalesizla @Chemp_admin1 Efootball mobile faoliyati tugadi Efteams statistika Only Khans 40+ win battle 20 lost battle Efpages teamlar Only Khans 5…»

12 Jan 2024, 07:55 UTC312 views2 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Akk sotiladi Event oynalsa 540 coins boladi Narxi 40ming som

🌚2

Signed Admin1

4 Jan 2024, 19:16 UTC336 views4 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

#Efteams rasmiy Madridista team vakili bilam battle Only Khans

🌚2👎1🔥1

Signed Admin1

4 Jan 2024, 19:14 UTC287 views1 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Shunaqa oyin bilan yutkizish mumkin😁😁 New United team vakili 2:3 umumiy hisob

🌚1

Signed Admin1

30 Dec 2023, 16:59 UTC203 views1 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

#Efpages Uzdominators team vakili @bigbenzi bilan o'yin @Chemp_admin1 win Only khans

🌚1

Signed Admin1

21 Dec 2023, 19:55 UTC221 views2 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

#Rasmiy battle Efpages Uzbek tiger team admini @NrRustamovich bilan oyin @Chemp_admin1 win Only Khans

🌚1🔥1

Signed Admin1

18 Dec 2023, 17:29 UTC200 views7 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

#Rasmiy battle Efpages FC Unbeatable team a'zosi @adik_1907 bilan Chempionat saralash o'yini @Chemp_admin1 win Only Khans

🔥5🌚1🏆1

Signed Admin1

16 Dec 2023, 19:27 UTC212 views3 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

#Rasmiy Efpages Kingdom team vakili @Nazarjonovich_A bilan hal qiluvchi oyin @Chemp_admin1 win Only Khans

🔥2🌚1

Signed Admin1

15 Dec 2023, 19:34 UTC187 views3 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

#rasmiy Efpages a'zosi Iconic team @Zafar0043 bilan oyin Yakunda shiddatli kechga oyinda @chemp_admin1 win Only Khans Admin1 o'z yurishlarini boshladi

🔥2🌚1

Signed Admin1

15 Dec 2023, 19:33 UTC181 views1 reactionsread 14 August 2026

Assalomu aleykum hammaga Only khans va uning a'zosi @chemp_admin1 o'z yurishlarini EFPAGES teamlarda davom ettiradi Faqat battle va chempionatdagi ishtirok etgan hisobla tashaladi

🌚1

Signed Admin1

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @chemp_admin1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,389,928 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Chemp_admin1” (@chemp_admin1), 2 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chemp_admin1.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.