Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Химия

Channel

Химия

@chemistry_elements

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

4,122subscribers

-7 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001460478093
TypeChannel
Username@chemistry_elements
Created19 November 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/chemistry_elements

Growth

4,1224,1294,125.56 August 2026 — 4,129 subscribers6 August 2026 — 4,129 subscribers10 August 2026 — 4,127 subscribers13 August 2026 — 4,124 subscribers16 August 2026 — 4,122 subscribers6 August 202616 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 10 days, net -7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,121–4,130 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 17:284,122-2
13 Aug 2026, 12:164,124-3
10 Aug 2026, 10:204,127-2
6 Aug 2026, 23:454,129no change
6 Aug 2026, 23:344,129first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 9 February 2021the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 5 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 December 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 09s
Average length
43s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

473 reactions across 18 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍27457.9%
8618.2%
🔥173.59%
😁132.75%
🤯122.54%
👏102.11%
🤡81.69%
👌71.48%
❤‍🔥61.27%
😱51.06%
🤣51.06%
🤩51.06%
🥰51.06%
🤔40.846%
🤨40.846%
👎30.634%
🥱30.634%
🌚20.423%
🍾20.423%
💯10.211%
1 further kind10.211%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 473reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 February 2021 to 29 December 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Dec 2024, 18:26 UTC≈5,900 views25 reactionsread 8 August 2026

ВПН 100 руб в месяц. Работает, когда другие отказывают. https://t.me/eastvpn

👍7🤡6🤯42🍾2🔥2💯1🤨1

21 Mar 2022, 13:18 UTC≈40,000 views98 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Кто объяснит, что там происходит? Почему такой голос? На нашем канале, мы уже пару раз обсуждали это.

👍69😁9👌7👏5🤣5🥰3

14 Mar 2022, 12:07 UTC≈40,200 views65 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Давно меня с вами не было, канал еще жив, будем дальше работать, кстати можете предлагать темы и даже контент

41👍14🤩5👎2😁2🤗1

5 Nov 2021, 13:17 UTC≈48,800 views34 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Горение азида натрия. Продукты реакции натрий и газообразный азот. Интересно, что данное соединения используется в подушках безопастности. При аварии с сильным ударом срабатывает датчик ускорения, сигнал этого датчика поджигает газообразующую смесь на основе азида натрия, при этом происходит реакция с большим выделением газообразного горячего азота, за счёт которого и надуваются подушки безопасности. Реакция: 2NaN₃ →

👍20🔥95

30 Oct 2021, 17:45 UTC≈41,200 views56 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Кто убийца?

  1. Мерри12%
  2. Николас40%
  3. Джонатан12%
  4. Химик - жив35%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

20👍13🤯8🤨3🥱3👏2🤡2🥰2

30 Oct 2021, 17:40 UTC≈35,100 views40 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Известный ученый-химик был найден убитым в своей собственной лаборатории. В помещении не нашли никаких улик, за исключением листка бумаги рядом с телом, на котором было перечислено несколько химических элементов. Следователь выяснил, что в день смерти в лабораторию к ученому приходили 3 человека: его жена Мэри, племянник Николас и друг Джонатан. Следователь тут же арестовал подозреваемого в убийстве. Как ему это уда

👍30😱54🔥1

25 Oct 2021, 15:20 UTC≈28,400 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Нобелевскую премию по химии за 2021 год присудили Бенджамину Листу и Дэвиду Макмиллану «за развитие асимметричного органокатализа». Долгое время считалось возможным использовать в качестве катализаторов только металлы и ферменты, однако около 20 лет назад Лист и Макмиллан независимо друг от друга разработали третий тип катализа — с использованием каркаса из атомов углерода, к которому могут присоединяться атомы боле

👍134

21 Oct 2021, 14:42 UTC≈25,300 views23 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Юпитер - это планета, которая на 90% состоит из водорода. В этом газовом гиганте водород присутствует в трёх состояниях: 1. Газообразный, находящихся в верхних слоях планеты. 2. Жидкий водород. 3. Металический водород. Существование металического водорода возможно при крайне высоком давлении. На земле, в лабораторных условиях, на мгновение удавалось получить металический водород. Что касается жидкого водорода, то его

👍20🔥3

19 Oct 2021, 08:30 UTC≈23,000 views22 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Poll

К сожалению не было меня с вами долгое время, но теперь я снова тут. А вы все еще здесь? ;)

  1. Да75%
  2. Уже нет11%
  3. Может быть14%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

👍18👏31

23 Feb 2021, 10:29 UTC≈50,000 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Прошел интересный тест, попробуйте и вы, результат скриньте в комментариях. https://www.16personalities.com/ru/test-lichnosti Это не химия и не реклама, просто интересный тест.

👍11👎1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @chemistry_elements. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

30 Oct 2021, 17:45 UTCAnonymous Quiz5,220 voters approx.

Кто убийца?

  1. Мерри12%
  2. Николас40%
  3. Джонатан12%
  4. Химик - жив35%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

19 Oct 2021, 08:30 UTCAnonymous Poll3,310 voters approx.

К сожалению не было меня с вами долгое время, но теперь я снова тут. А вы все еще здесь? ;)

  1. Да75%
  2. Уже нет11%
  3. Может быть14%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 February 2021 to 29 December 2024. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Химия” (@chemistry_elements), 4,122 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chemistry_elements.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.