7 measurements spanning 13 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,547–1,553 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Aug 2026, 06:02
1,549
+1
16 Aug 2026, 04:58
1,548
-3
12 Aug 2026, 14:25
1,551
-1
9 Aug 2026, 20:12
1,552
+1
6 Aug 2026, 18:45
1,551
-1
6 Aug 2026, 17:46
1,552
no change
6 Aug 2026, 17:39
1,552
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 11 May 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
22.4%
avg views ÷ 1,549 subscribers
Avg views / post
347
1 post measured
Reaction rate
4.03%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 19 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 July 2026
Posts held
19 (11 May 2025 – 28 July 2026)
Views total
347
Reactions total
14
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 18:07 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
12m 55s
Average length
3m 14s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
123 reactions across 17 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
75
61.0%
👍
27
22.0%
👏
18
14.6%
👎
3
2.44%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 123reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 11 May 2025 to 28 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
درگذشت رودولف مارکوس؛ دانشمندی که حرکت الکترونها را برای جهان توضیح داد
رودولف آرتور «رودی» مارکوس، شیمیدان برجسته و برنده جایزه نوبل شیمی، در ۱۶ ژوئیه ۲۰۲۶ و تنها پنج روز پیش از تولد ۱۰۳ سالگیاش درگذشت.
مارکوس در سال ۱۹۹۲ بهدلیل ارائه نظریهای بنیادین درباره «انتقال الکترون در واکنشهای شیمیایی» موفق به دریافت جایزه نوبل شد؛ نظریهای که توضیح میدهد چرا انتقال الکترون میان مولکولها گاهی بسیار سریع و گاهی برخل…
جایزه نوبل شیمی سال ۲۰۲۵
آکادمی سلطنتی علوم سوئد تصمیم گرفته است جایزه نوبل شیمی سال ۲۰۲۵ را به سوسومو کیتاگاوا، ریچارد رابسون و عمر یاغی اعطا کند؛
«بهپاس توسعهٔ چارچوبهای فلزی-آلی (Metal–Organic Frameworks یا MOFs).»
برندگان جایزه نوبل شیمی امسال موفق به طراحی و ساخت سازههای مولکولی با فضاهای وسیع شدهاند که امکان عبور گازها و مواد شیمیایی از درون آنها را فراهم میسازد. این سازهها، که با عنوان چارچوبهای فلزی…
درباره جایزه نوبل فیزیک سال ۲۰۲۵
یکی از پرسشهای بنیادین در فیزیک آن است که بزرگترین ابعاد ممکن برای یک سامانهای که بتواند رفتارهای کوانتومی از خود نشان دهد، چیست؟ برندگان امسال با طراحی و اجرای آزمایشهایی بر روی یک مدار الکتریکی، موفق شدند هم تونلزنی کوانتومی و هم سطوح انرژی کوانتیده را در سامانهای به نمایش بگذارند که ابعاد آن به اندازهای بود که در دست جای میگرفت.
در سالهای ۱۹۸۴ و ۱۹۸۵، کلارک، دووره و مارت…
آکادمی سلطنتی علوم سوئد تصمیم گرفته است جایزه نوبل فیزیک سال ۲۰۲۵ را به جان کلارک، میشل اچ. دوورِه و جان ام. مارتینیس اعطا کند؛
«بهپاس کشف تونلزنی کوانتومی در مقیاس ماکروسکوپی و کوانتیدهبودن انرژی در یک مدار الکتریکی.»
آزمایشهای برندگان امسال نوبل فیزیک، که بر روی یک تراشه انجام شدهاند، جلوهای عملی از فیزیک کوانتومی را به نمایش گذاشتهاند. جایزه نوبل فیزیک امسال، افقهای نوینی را برای توسعهٔ نسل آیندهٔ فناوری…
ترکیب جدید اورگانوفلزی، یکی از اصول بنیادین شیمی کلاسیک را به چالش میکشد
بیش از یک قرن است که قانون شناختهشده ۱۸ الکترونی، مسیر شیمی اورگانوفلزی را تعیین کرده است. اکنون پژوهشگران مؤسسه علوم و فناوری اوکیناوا (OIST) با همکاری دانشمندانی از آلمان، روسیه و ژاپن موفق به سنتز ترکیب اورگانوفلزی نوینی شدهاند که این اصل دیرینه را زیر سؤال میبرد. آنها مشتق پایداری از فروسن—یک کمپلکس فلزی-آلی مبتنی بر آهن—با ۲۰ الکترون …
سنتز آلوتروپ جدید کربن
در یک مطالعه جدید به رهبری دپارتمان شیمی دانشگاه آکسفورد، شیمیدانان موفق به سنتز نوعی سیکلوکربن شدند که از پایداری کافی برای شناسایی طیفسنجی در محلول و در دمای اتاق برخوردار است. در این پژوهش، مولکول سیکلو[۴۸]کربن بهصورت یک کاتنان سنتز شد؛ به این معنا که حلقه C48 از میان سه ماکروسیکل دیگر عبور داده شده است. این ماکروسیکلهای رشتهمانند با ایجاد مانع فیزیکی، دسترسی به سیکلوکربن محافظتشده را …
مولکولهای خمیده، نور خورشید را بهصورت انرژی شیمیایی ذخیره کرده و در صورت نیاز، آن را به گرما تبدیل میکنند
در مطالعهای تازه که در نشریه Chem منتشر شده، پژوهشگران مشتقات خمیده آنتراسن را معرفی کردهاند—مولکولهای آلیای که در قطران زغالسنگ یافت میشوند—و نشان دادهاند که این ترکیبات پس از جذب نور خورشید دچار تغییرات ساختاری میشوند. سپس، با بازگشت به شکل اولیه خود، انرژی خورشیدی ذخیرهشده
را بهصورت گرما آزاد می…
👍7
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @chemhouse. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,546,584 of 1,569,246entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“خانه شیمی” (@chemhouse), 1,549 subscribers as measured 19 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chemhouse.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.