Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Wahrheitsträger

Channel

Wahrheitsträger

@chekuven

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

213subscribers

+205 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002572924089
TypeChannel
Username@chekuven
Created17 June 2025measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live22 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 22 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/chekuven

Growth

82281187 August 2026 — 8 subscribers12 August 2026 — 8 subscribers15 August 2026 — 228 subscribers22 August 2026 — 213 subscribers2137 August 202622 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 15 days, net +205. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
22 Aug 2026, 08:57213-15
15 Aug 2026, 07:17228+220
12 Aug 2026, 14:478no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:048first reading

Engagement

7 posts held, back to 17 June 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
444.7%
avg views ÷ 213 subscribers
Avg views / post
947
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
8.99%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 7 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held7 (17 June 202510 August 2026)
Views total4,736
Reactions total426
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 14:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

597 reactions across 6 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 13.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🍓7913.2%
custom 54181843644060905396811.4%
🌚6611.1%
🗿6510.9%
custom 5249475403319360752508.38%
💊498.21%
custom 5249497320537473178345.70%
custom 5246873452001903952315.19%
custom 5249372620457000931274.52%
custom 5249195448761073458254.19%
👾223.69%
custom 5249026712380915502203.35%
142.35%
🆒132.18%
custom 524896773818497356691.51%
custom 524906778944813701091.51%
custom 524907082169504776581.34%
custom 524935577559526680881.34%

Custom emoji. 11 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 597reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 17 June 2025 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
19
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 6 we hold a reading for · 17%
Most on one post
19
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @chekuven. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 7 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 17 June 2025 to 10 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 09:58 UTC40 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

custom 52490267123809155023💊2👾1custom 52494754033193607521

9 Aug 2026, 21:38 UTC71 views27 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Заходим в чатик😵‍💫

custom 52490267123809155029custom 52468734520019039528custom 52494754033193607527👾1💊1🆒1

8 Aug 2026, 22:38 UTC175 views101 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Заходим в чат 👹 https://t.me/kamilaLjo

custom 524947540331936075230💊29👾20custom 5249195448761073458125custom 52468734520019039525

8 Aug 2026, 18:46 UTC≈2,240 views162 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Sie können nicht gelehrt werden.

🌚41🍓40🗿30💊10custom 52468734520019039529custom 52490267123809155028custom 52491954487610734587custom 52494754033193607527

8 Aug 2026, 18:43 UTC≈2,210 views129 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Chinesen, schreiben Sie mir nicht.

🗿35🍓31🌚25custom 52468734520019039529💊7🆒6custom 524919544876107345865

2 Sept 2025, 01:13 UTC≈2,770 views171 reactions19 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Die Stille sagt oft mehr als tausend Worte.

custom 541818436440609053968custom 524949732053747317834custom 524937262045700093127custom 52489677381849735669custom 52490677894481370109🍓8custom 52490708216950477658custom 52493557755952668088

Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @chekuven. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 697,804 of 1,602,822entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Wahrheitsträger” (@chekuven), 213 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chekuven.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.