Channel
@chatujemywyniki
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
153subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003242895640 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @chatujemywyniki |
| Description | 💬 pierwsza polska agencja chatterska of + fansly. aktualnie generujemy ponad 400k pln / msc z OFa w PL. maksymalizujemy zyski pisząc, ty skupiasz się na trafficu. 📲 kontakt: @przychlast 📈 wyniki: @chatujemywyniki |
| Created | 4 November 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/chatujemywyniki |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 19:15 | 153 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:33 | 153 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 4 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 13 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
last 24h konto wczoraj wygenerowało $1,923.36. 💰 zarobek z samych subów? $230,40 z chattingu? $1,692,96 ratio ~1:7 (subs : chat) czyli zarobiliśmy ponad 7x więcej z chattingu niż z subskrypcji.
last 24h na konto modelki wpadło 48 free subów. z tej bazy wygenerowaliśmy $1,044. 💰 zarobek średnio ~$21.75 na suba. dla porównania, ~$5 za granicą uznaje się już za bardzo dobry wynik.
last 24h konto wczoraj wygenerowało $2,247.60. 💰 zarobek z samych subów? $140.40 z chattingu? $2,107.20 ratio 1:15 (subs:chat) czyli zarobiliśmy ponad 15x więcej z chattingu niż z subskrypcji.
💬 szybki case z ostatnich 24h na konto modelki wpadło 28 free subów. z tej bazy wygenerowaliśmy $590. 💰 co to oznacza? to daje średnio ~$21 na suba. dla porównania ~$5 za granicą uznaje się już za bardzo dobry wynik. my zrobiliśmy 4x 🤪
last 24h konto wczoraj wygenerowało $2,426.80. 💰 zarobek z samych subów? $166.80 z chattingu? $2,260 czyli zarobiliśmy ponad 13x więcej z chattingu niż z subskrypcji.
💬 szybki case z ostatniego tygodnia na konto modelki doszło 166 osób na w pełni darmowym subie. wyciągnęliśmy z tego $2600. to daje średnio ~$16 na użytkownika. dla porównania — ~$5 za granicą uznaje się już za bardzo dobry wynik. my zrobiliśmy 3x 🤪
last 24h konto wczoraj zarobiło $2,564 💰 zarobek z samych subów? $146 z chattingu? $2,364 czyli zarobiliśmy ponad 16x więcej z chattingu niż z subskrypcji.
this week konto w tym tygodniu zarobiło $12,971. 💰 zarobek z samych subów? $2,096 z chattingu? $10,875 czyli zarobiliśmy ponad 5x więcej z chattingu niż z subskrypcji.
💬 pewna polska modelka... jej właściciel prowadził ją od sierpnia 2025. 30–40 darmowych subów dziennie, ale mało sprzedaży, przez słaby chatting. w trzy miesiące zrobił… $4500. i odezwał się do nas. 1 listopada przejęliśmy chatting. 📈 efekt po 14 dniach? $7000, czyli więcej w 2 tygodnie niż wcześniej w 3 miesiące. to nie był inny traffic, nie inna cena suba, nie „nowa metodka”. wszystko było dokładnie takie samo…
🕰 w przeciągu ostatnich 24h... na powyższe konto wpadło ok. 37 nowych subów, czyli razem $133. ile wygenerowalśmy z chattingu? $2724. czyli ponad 20x więcej z samych rozmów niż z subskrypcji. jak widać, nie potrzeba więcej ruchu, tylko ludzi, którzy wiedzą, co zrobić z aktualnym ;p
this month na konto przyszły 102 suby. 💰 zarobek: z samych subów? $457,5. z chattingu? $10,383. czyli zarobiliśmy ponad 22x więcej z samego chattingu niż z subskrypcji.
this week na konto przyszło 69 subów. 💰 zarobek: z samych subów? $309. z chattingu? $6,313. czyli zarobiliśmy ponad 20x więcej z samego chattingu niż z subskrypcji.
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @chatujemywyniki. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 990,661 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“@chatujemy wyniki” (@chatujemywyniki), 153 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chatujemywyniki.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.