
Bot
ChatGPT 5
@chatgpt3
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Citations · Cite this entry
22,206monthly users
-3,179 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | 6062310939 |
|---|---|
| Type | Bot |
| Usernames | @chatgpt3 @chatgpt_tgm_bot |
| First recorded | 15 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/chatgpt3 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Monthly users | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 20:56 | 22,206 | no change |
| 17 Aug 2026, 14:39 | 22,206 | -1,091 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 19:15 | 23,297 | no change |
| 15 Aug 2026, 13:48 | 23,297 | no change |
| 14 Aug 2026, 13:24 | 23,297 | -441 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 05:18 | 23,738 | no change |
| 13 Aug 2026, 00:26 | 23,738 | -222 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 03:02 | 23,960 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 01:54 | 23,960 | -775 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 01:42 | 24,735 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:33 | 24,735 | -650 |
| 5 Aug 2026, 22:04 | 25,385 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 22:03 | 25,385 | first reading |
Engagement
No post feed to measure. Telegram publishes a readable post stream for channels, not for bots, so views, reactions and engagement rates do not exist for this entry — they are not missing, pending or withheld. The register records what this handle is and what it resolves to.
Mentions
Named by 21 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@js_test · 9,88170 postsChatGPT 5 | Нейросети | Gemini
@gpt_chat · 119,52255 postsГрафика и дизайн | IT
@graphic_and_design · 23,44417 postsНейропсихология
@neuropsychology · 140,6479 postsOmline
@omliner · 85 postsДизайн-форум🎙
@design_forum_russia · 11,8262 postsДизайн Инсайдер
@design_insider · 1,8432 postsFixPro
@fixpro_77 · 22 postsЛогово дизайнера
@lgvdsgner · 25,7412 postsАрмянский калейдоскоп
@Armenian_Kaleidoscope · 2801 postWorld of Bots | Боты
@b0ts_channel · 3511 post⚡️𝘕𝘈𝘛𝘈𝘓𝘠𝘈
@birth_e · 2091 postРАЗМАХ на ТЕЛЕГРАМ💰 с Еленой
@delaemmillion888 · 3901 postExcursion to Blockchain (UA)
@Excursion_to_Blockchain · 171 postФилсонов про Трафик TG
@Feelson_TG · 281 postМарина Головко | БОТЫ для МЛМ
@golovkomarina · 911 postOSIYO XAKKER
@haker_xaker_hakker_osiyo_xakker · 1,2371 postХочу в IT
@khochuvit · 361 postМосквач • Новости Москвы
@moscowach · 4,329,5051 postНаим Султонов
@naimjon2090 · 1601 postVision | Нейросеть
@vision_openAl · 541 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ChatGPT 5” (@chatgpt3), 22,206 monthly users as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chatgpt3.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.