Channel
@chatex_an
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
557subscribers
-6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001320658720 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @chatex_an |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 27 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/chatex_an |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 20 Aug 2026, 21:57 | 557 | -2 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 20:37 | 559 | -4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:17 | 563 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:04 | 563 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 2 November 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 August 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Hello, dear friends! We apologize for the long silence. We continue to work on delisting from the sanctions list and obtaining a license to withdraw user funds. The process is practically not moving forward, because due to the situation in the world, OFAC is focused on other things. The deadlines for response and consideration of existing requests for licenses on their part are uncertain, and, unfortunately, there i…
Hello, dear friends! We collected your frequently asked questions and aim to create one or several posts with answers. First of all, about our current situation. OFAC, due to the current situation, answers rather reluctantly. Unfortunately, cases, similar to Chatex, are not the top priority right now. That’s why the process of approval for companies and individuals takes time. If you have already got a license – p…
Hello, dear friends! Long story short – we don’t have news for you. Our approximate terms remain the same. There’s no deterioration of information exchange with OFAC. But, it’s not becoming faster either. In the current highly volatile situation with a lot of tools and assets we wish you to remain sharp mind and strong mental capacities. We are not going to discuss the situation in the world. We are sure that the…
Hello, dear friends! First of all, we apologize for the silent week. At the moment there is no important news. When there is nothing to announce and there are no updates, there is no post either. It’s not because we’re hiding something. But simply because we are not a newsmaker company and not a meme public. Work with OFAC continues. At the moment we are giving explanations to all questions of interest to the depart…
Hello, dear friends! First of all, we’d like to apologize for our absence of content during last week. We haven’t got any news yet. Now we’re keeping up our work with OFAC and conduct all processes required to get a common OFAC license step-by-step. Also, we do our best in order to fulfill your documents requests for individual licenses applications. Also we changed our e-mail. You may send your requests here: chat…
Dear friends! Some time has passed since the sanctions hit, and, effective today, our domain name owner GoDaddy has terminated their partnership with us, complying with OFAC sanctions. In other words, due to this our website chatex.com is no longer available and we won't be able to relaunch it until the delisting procedure is at an end. By the way, here is a post we had where we talk about the delisting more, for yo…
Hello, dear friends! First of all, we’d like to wish you the best in terms of achieving your cravings and plans in 2022! We’re here again. We came back to our working process on getting a common OFAC license 🤝 We frequently get the same question: are there any legal limits for OFAC requests’ consideration? The thing is, this consideration stage of our request is completed. Now we are on a stage of detailed work on…
Dear friends! We are waiting for OFAC decision regarding to our common OFAC license, as we’ve mentioned earlier ☝️ It looks like the most important news will appear in January, 2022. Our top priority remains the same – returning all of our users funds, which were frozen due to sanctions. About our accomplishments in this field you can read in our previous posts, which have been published every Tuesday (Wednesday, …
Dear community, here’s our update: We are waiting for the decision for our enquiry to common OFAC license, as we mentioned earlier. Mr. Erich Ferrari and his team are proceeding our case now. Such cases are the main field of their work. ☝️ What is a common license? It’s an OFAC permit for us, as a company, to adjust (conduct transactions etc) funds which are under sanctions. With this license we’ll be able to brin…
Dear community, here’s our update: Unfortunately, there’s no any significant news today. 😕 We are still working on obtaining OFAC license, as we mentioned earlier. However, we are glad to announce that our contact person is Mr. Erich Ferrari (we got a lot of questions on this issue, because this information is required for OFAC individual license request) Address for official correspondence remains the same: ✅ High…
Dear community, here’s our update: 1. There were lots of questions about our legal representatives. Let us introduce you Mr. Erich Ferrari and his expert team, which specializes in interactions with OFAC. Half of his team are ex OFAC employees. So, Erich Ferrari’s office is one of the several, who concentrates on interactions with OFAC and sanctions. 2. We have a roadmap, which is now in action. We are not able to …
Friends, we have been collecting all your questions for a whole week. And we have prepared a post, where the answers to the most popular of them. Every Tuesday we will publish updates and answers to your other questions 🙏
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @chatex_an. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Vote for YOUR favourite GIF Contest Entry!
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 November 2021 to 22 August 2022. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 980,926 of 1,623,166entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 20 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Chatex Announcements” (@chatex_an), 557 subscribers as measured 20 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chatex_an.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.