Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

чаша полна книг

@chashaofbooks

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

41subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002364253033
TypeChannel
Username@chashaofbooks
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/chashaofbooks

Growth

414241.57 August 2026 — 42 subscribers10 August 2026 — 42 subscribers14 August 2026 — 41 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 41–42 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 16:0641-1
10 Aug 2026, 17:1642no change
7 Aug 2026, 09:4742first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 13 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
56.1%
avg views ÷ 41 subscribers
Avg views / post
23.0
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
30.4%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 13 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 July 2026
Posts held13 (13 July 202630 July 2026)
Views total161
Reactions total49
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 17:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

92 reactions across 12 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💋5863.0%
🐳1213.0%
😢99.78%
🤣88.70%
👻55.43%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 92reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Jul 2026, 14:29 UTC13 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Дочитала "Вьюрки"👍 ещё одна классная книга в список моих рекомендаций вам я что-то прям максимально продуктивна в чтении в этот месяц. Хоть что-то радует🫠

💋3

30 Jul 2026, 06:01 UTC15 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🤍 что читаю: • Дарья Бобылёва "Вьюрки" - 515/659 - читаю в электронке и плавно движусь к развязке. Очень нравится: жутко, интересно и сюжет затягивает. • Виктор Гюго "Человек, который смеётся" - 91/634 - расчитываю автора, очень много описаний, немного тяжеловато. Но это единственная книга, которая ещё не читана и с собой в бумаге. У нас не было света и воды неделю. И выживание в таких условиях было испытанием на

💋3

21 Jul 2026, 12:16 UTC31 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Сын активно играет с подушками от дивана. Строит шалаш, футбольные ворота, использует вместо боксерской груши. - Перестань. Ты же пыль поднимаешь! - Я не поднимаю, а помогаю ей распространяться. - 🗿🗿🗿 Что-то явно пошло не так...

🤣8

21 Jul 2026, 11:22 UTC30 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🫶 какая же шикарная книга! Читаю и наслаждаюсь эмоциями! Персонажи бесят, страсти накаляются - тут похлеще бразильских сериалов нашего детства😂 Главная героиня Жанна, баронесса, выходит замуж за бедного виконта, который пустил пыль в глаза, а после свадьбы показал себя во всей красе. Любителям "Замка Броуди" понравится. Хотя этому Жюльену до Броуди далеко ещё, есть чему поучиться🤭 Короче, ждём развязки, где каждому

💋5

20 Jul 2026, 17:49 UTC26 views15 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

маленький пост-откровение 🤍 мы живём в непростое время. и мне не хочется причесывать свою реальность, делать её красивее, эстетичнее или беззаботнее, чем она есть. наши молодые годы полны противоречивых чувств и эмоций. мы идём есть мороженое с детьми, игнорируя смски и предупреждения. мы спокойно засыпаем после особо громких моментов ночью. мы работаем и учимся, обходя ограничения. общаемся с людьми, читаем книги,

💋11🐳4

19 Jul 2026, 13:34 UTC19 views11 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🤍 доброго денёчка/вечерочка (ну у кого как) Вчера начала читать "Жизнь" Мопассана у Лены в сч - очень даже хорошо. Нравятся все эти описания, красивый слог. Предчувствие, что всё будет не так солнечно и прекрасно, как в первых главах. Ну и по традиции сегодня ночью я сидела в прострации, пока гудело над головой. Вещи собирать порывалась, но к утру отпустило. Поглядела из окна на морюшко. Сейчас ещё нектарины и перс

💋8👻3

17 Jul 2026, 13:13 UTC27 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Если честно, то какая-то скучная и ненастоящая... Тоже сборник историй разных людей, которых связывает закусочная, но всё так не стыкуется. Некоторые поступки персонажей, как у детей в 5 лет. Вернее так повествуется. Не знаю, перевод это косячный или история. Но я отправляю книгу в недочитыши.

🐳4

16 Jul 2026, 16:15 UTC32 views10 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🤍 сегодня не очень удачный день, но вечер прекрасный... Самочувствие оставляет желать лучшего. Пока не понимаю это результат фоновой тревоги или общее самочувствие. Спасают книги и фильмы. И тюлений режим в течение дня. Ну и много теплого питья.

💋6🐳4

16 Jul 2026, 07:28 UTC25 views9 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🦋Владимир Набоков "Лолита" Роман, который вызывает споры уже 70 лет. Набоков попал точно в цель🫠 Аннотацию писать не стану. С сюжетом знакомы даже те, кто не читал. А отзыв ловите в комментариях👇 А фото генерила в gpt, ибо мои бумажные книги канули в лету.

💋9

15 Jul 2026, 11:51 UTC23 views9 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Пока жду сч по Мопассану, решила взять очередной хиллинг-роман на эти дни🙈 недавно откладывала его на прочтение Немного отдохнуть мыслями и выдохнуть. Сейчас мало, что получается у меня в жизни. Никакой устойчивости и уверенности в завтрашнем дне. Всё сложно и грустно, если честно. Поэтому наполняемся надеждой и светом, дабы вообще не замкнуться в себе и своих проблемах.

💋7👻2

15 Jul 2026, 07:40 UTC20 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026

🌊 доброе утречко В отключениях света и связи есть несколько плюсов: я стала больше читать и проводить время с детьми. Готовимся с младшим к школе, а "Лолита" почти дочитана. Ждите отзыв в скором времени. В планах потом Мопассан и что-то ещё❤️

💋6

15 Jul 2026, 06:50 UTC13 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @esvasinabooksPhoto

🕯️уютные чтения классики

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @chashaofbooks. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 710,118 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“чаша полна книг” (@chashaofbooks), 41 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chashaofbooks.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.