Channel
@chasewh_zypj
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
8,205subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 October 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003739631375 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @chasewh_zypj |
| Description | 👤 唯一管理:@chase_xh_bot 📝 作业投稿: @chasehwxc_bot ——————————— 💗野寻 • 榜单结构: https://t.me/wh_xxoo/10 |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 31 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 October 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/chasewh_zypj |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Oct 2026, 13:22 | 8,205 | no change |
| 8 Oct 2026, 12:47 | 8,205 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 3 October 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 10 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 10 (3 October 2026 – 8 October 2026) |
| Views total | 3,570 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Oct 2026, 13:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 3 October 2026 to 8 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
♡ 鹤息严选 ♡ ⌚️ 评价时间：2026-10-07 👩🏻🎓 服务老师：荔枝 👨🏻💻 留名：猪皮 颜值：9 环境：9 身材：9 态度：9 服务：8 人照：9 综合：8.83 💌 服务过程 ： 针对荔枝妹妹，我只讲三个关键词：馒头比，女大，真c胸。 讲实话有这三个关键词开5，已经很不错了，而且还任盘，不管是亲还是换姿势都很耐心，整体可以给到一个80分； 但缺点也有，看得出来是刚开不久，很多事都不是很主动，比如拿水（妹妹家里有水，但你得提醒一下她），服务不多，如果长期开的话各位可以多开发一下，就当给各位小试个车👯👯👯 🔗 老师资料 ：https://t.me/chasewh_xcda/528
♡ 鹤息严选 ♡ ⌚️ 评价时间：2026-10-08 👩🏻🎓 服务老师：小宅 👨🏻💻 留名：匿名 颜值： 环境：9 身材：8 态度：8 服务： 人照：8 综合：8.25 💌 服务过程 ： 妹妹很年轻，身材巨棒，bbw星人狂喜。房间布置的很温馨，有一种跟女朋友恋爱感觉，值得一去😁 🔗 老师资料 ：https://t.me/chasewh_xcda/682
♡ 鹤息严选 ♡ ⌚️ 评价时间：2026-10-07 👩🏻🎓 服务老师：乐瑶 👨🏻💻 留名：匿名 颜值：8.5 环境：9 身材：9.9 态度：9 服务：9 人照：8.5 综合：8.98 💌 服务过程 ： 临时决定过去，问了一下竟然有空，马上跑过去，很害羞，话很少，身材绝了，胸型完美，腰没有一点赘肉，是我见过最好看的身形，服务就相当于没有，突出一个嫩，进入状态以后床感还是不错的，从一开始的不知所措到会主动去摸你的胸，腿主动勾你，总之调教好了会很不错 🔗 老师资料 ：https://t.me/chasewh_xcda/533
♡ 鹤息严选 ♡ ⌚️ 评价时间：2026-10-07 👩🏻🎓 服务老师：佳佳 👨🏻💻 留名：匿名 颜值：9 环境：8 身材：8 态度：9.5 服务：9.5 人照：8.5 综合：8.75 💌 服务过程 ： 本人比照片更真实自然一点，很漂亮，比较腼腆，态度很好，像初恋女友第一次做的感觉，后面进入状态以后很迷人，反馈真实 🔗 老师资料 ：https://t.me/chasewh_xcda/544
♡ 鹤息严选 ♡ ⌚️ 评价时间：2026-10-06 👩🏻🎓 服务老师：汤圆 👨🏻💻 留名：小鼬 颜值：9 环境：8 身材：10 态度：10 服务：9 人照：10 综合：9.33 💌 服务过程 ： 妹子很可爱，进门一直捂着嘴巴害羞的笑，之前一直不相信这么瘦的嫩妹能有D，脱了衣服以后我信了，态度很好，姿势都配合，也不会催，🐍的特别爽，日感也很好，肯定还会二刷！ 🔗 老师资料 ：https://t.me/chasewh_xcda/387
♡ 鹤息严选 ♡ ⌚️ 评价时间：2026-10-06 👩🏻🎓 服务老师：汤圆 👨🏻💻 留名：匿名 颜值：8.5 环境：8 身材：8.5 态度：8.5 服务：7.5 人照：8 综合：8.17 💌 服务过程 ： 今天约了的汤圆宝宝 课室是小区房间 安静整洁 遥控上楼 开门就看见一张萌脸 嫩妹一个 本人的话比起照片感觉要更偏可爱风一点 进门闲聊一下开始🐍 鸡儿🐍硬了和妹子洗澡 边洗边🐍 变摸大奶子 不得不说妹子这奶子是真大 又润 你敢信这才18岁？ 洗完擦干 开始把玩妹妹的小bb 水是真多 没摸几下下面就湿了 敏感小b 盘爽了开始让妹子口 可能是昨天熬夜到五点到原因加上妹子的小嘴实在诱人 1p居然直接交代了 休息冲洗一下开始第2p，先传教士起手 汤圆这下面是真润 年轻水就是多 bb紧滑 做了没一会儿来感觉了 立马换后入 不断撞击大屁股 妹妹的奶子也会跟着一起颤动 相当带感 运动了一小会儿顺利出水 可惜我今天状态…
♡ 鹤息严选 ♡ ⌚️ 评价时间：2026-10-05 👩🏻🎓 服务老师：小雨 👨🏻💻 留名：匿名 颜值：8 环境：8 身材：10 态度：9 服务：9 人照：9 综合：8.83 💌 服务过程 ： 闲话少叙离家比较近直接出击 开门一头乌黑亮丽长发的嫩妹很热情主动聊天一点不尴尬坐沙发上一起抽烟聊天熟络一会儿感情我特意交代要看jk黑丝老师一口就答应下来随后洗澡有陪浴好评我们坦诚相见浑身赤裸我再也忍不住上手把玩老师的大胸和乳头纯天然C！很软很弹很滑！老师会拿沐浴露浑身上下洗干净然后帮忙擦拭我回到房间老师已经换上jk和黑丝我躺在床上小鹿乱撞老师看出我的紧张指滑帮我舒缓情绪差不多了一口吞下我的二弟深喉真爽无齿感不敷衍不喊停不主动停口完摸了一把老师的小穴已经是汪洋大海晶莹剔透随后女上烫！紧！滑！差点直接交货对日感有要求的强烈推荐边吃大奶子边女上实在是快活随后传教士老师疯狂迎合我主动拿手推我的屁股仿佛怎么都喂不饱疑似需求旺盛耐桩体质…
♡ 鹤息严选 ♡ ⌚️ 评价时间：2026-10-04 👩🏻🎓 服务老师：灵灵 👨🏻💻 留名：匿名 颜值：10 环境：9 身材：10 态度：9 服务：9 人照：10 综合：9.5 💌 服务过程 ： 预约了老师4点，遥控上楼。开门的时候躲在门后，进去后见到全貌，身材相当不错，该大的地方一点不含糊。句句有回应配合度高，属于是你主动她就话多的那种。口活也很好一进一出包裹紧。女上，搂着蛇了一会就步入正题。户型非常好看，白嫩透亮，干净无异味。丰满蜜桃臀，视觉效果强，撞击感强还带回弹，非常值得一试。可二刷 🔗 老师资料 ：https://t.me/chasewh_xcda/133
♡ 鹤息严选 ♡ ⌚️ 评价时间：2026-10-04 👩🏻🎓 服务老师：林苏苏 👨🏻💻 留名：野牛 颜值：9 环境：9 身材：9 态度：9.5 服务：9.5 人照：9 综合：9.17 💌 服务过程 ： 进门之后 苏苏老师穿了一件黑色的包臀裙 前凸后翘的身材把我小弟勾引的不要不要的 皮肤又白又嫩 满脸的娇羞 脸上红扑扑的 很有感觉 在沙发上尬聊了一会交了水费 她就进去试水温 后面就帮我把衣服脱下去了淋浴间 洗的很认真 爽飞天了 然后老师给我擦干了水分 就来到了床上 还穿上了我带来的黑丝 我上来就主动出击 摸索了一番 然后 慢慢的就扯开了黑丝 把小弟放在她那下面一直蹭 看她挺不住了 一直留水 我就挺了进去 真的是又热又紧 老师的叫声也是一绝 爽的我直掀天灵盖 我一上一下 她一直说宝宝轻一点 越是这样我越兴奋 于是我更用力了 后面到了高潮她一直夹我小弟 我被顶的实在不行了 然后就给了她 她满脸享受的样子 我也很知足 然后…
♡ 鹤息严选 ♡ ⌚️ 评价时间：2026-10-02 👩🏻🎓 服务老师：果果 👨🏻💻 留名：Aicxf 上岸水群版 颜值：9 环境：9 身材：9 态度：9 服务：8.5 人照：9 综合：8.92 💌 服务过程 ： 果果 不知道怎么给她分类... 大个子 贫乳 超级腰臀比 给她单开一栏吗？？ 这是第二次吃了 第一次她给我秒了 进门出门半个小时都没有 这一次日着日着发现要红休了 果果这个腰臀 厚乳简直爽到爆 好大的屁股好好看 有弹性的那种 日感也是 紧的鸡儿都胀痛 两条大白腿也是又滑又软 可惜了 你们得等七天之后才能吃 🔗 老师资料 ：https://t.me/chasewh_xcda/515
🔥1
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @chasewh_zypj. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“野寻.武汉作业评价” (@chasewh_zypj), 8,205 subscribers as measured 8 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chasewh_zypj.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.