#频道互推 #相似推荐 ------------------------------ 📢 常德滴滴在线交友榜 📢 涵宝个人介绍 📢 IG💗line🧡Fb❤kakao【小徐】 📢 西安·鹤宫 📢 全国同城交友 📢 昆明猛男圈 📢 『上海』学生出版社 📢 东南亚相亲交友站 📢 Soul 探探 伊对 钻石 珍爱 世纪佳缘 百合 📢 Pairs Omai -日本婚恋交友软件 ------------------------------ ☁️ 互推入口:@sooo

Channel
深夜朴社长树洞交友
@chaseshudong
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
20,882subscribers
-493 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001887912548 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @chaseshudong |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/chaseshudong |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 15:55 | 20,882 | -14 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 00:47 | 20,896 | -102 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 21:03 | 20,998 | -77 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 17:44 | 21,075 | -141 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 17:57 | 21,216 | -40 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 21:31 | 21,256 | -38 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 19:04 | 21,294 | -75 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:38 | 21,369 | -6 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:16 | 21,375 | first reading |
Engagement
22 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 26 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 34.9%
- avg views ÷ 20,882 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 7,280
- 22 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.021%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 22
- of 22 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 15 of 22 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 22 (30 July 2026 – 15 August 2026) |
| Views total | 160,141 |
| Reactions total | 31 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Aug 2026, 09:51 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 13s
- Average length
- 13s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
31 reactions across 14 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 90.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 28 | 90.3% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 6.45% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 3.23% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 31reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
#树洞 #缺爱 #辅导学习 via 野寻投稿 初二那年谈了一个男朋友,他对我很好,我也很喜欢他。我也不知道当时怎么想的,我学习很好,长得一般般,家里也没什么钱,不过身材挺好的。他学习不怎么样,就是长得特别帅,家里也有钱。我当时可能是缺爱吧,家里重男轻女,我真的特别喜欢他。那年暑假,他带我出去玩,晚上吃了饭,他说想让我辅导他学习,我就跟他回了家。当时他家长都不在家,他直接带我去了他卧室,然后他就抱住了我。当时我俩谈了一年了,但是一直没有什么举动,最多也就牵牵手,摸摸脸什么的。这次他直接抱住了我,还一直闻我,我虽然有些不适,但是也没反抗,因为我真的好喜欢他,闻着闻着,他对着我的嘴吻了下来,然后他的手开始不老实了,他先是摸我的🐻,当时我已经极度不适了,当他的手顺着我的腰往下划,划到小腹的时候我终于忍不住了,推开了他,我当时很明确的拒绝了他,但他就像变了个人一样,以前还是挺听我话的,这次没有。他直接把我推到床上,我想反抗,但是被他死…
❤1
🎉 本频道已恢复 SOSO 收录 搜索展示正在更新。 欢迎点击下方按钮为本频道助力,提升排名!
#树洞 #修车 #老师 via 免费投稿 想问各位有经验的大哥们一个问题。那种城市修车群里的认证老师都是安全的吗,这个认证是怎么个认证法呀。最近想出击一个老师,但是考虑的比较多,担心做一半被跳了或者是被传染性病什么的。很纠结,请各位前辈指点迷津 🌙 加入讨论内容点击评论区查看
#吃瓜 #网红 #巨乳 via 免费投稿 家人们谁懂啊!快手极品身材网红「瑶瑶睡不醒」表面人设是高颜值巨乳美腿少女,结果小号直接自爆:21岁离异还带俩娃,大小号双开专门勾金主!这波高价定制福利彻底流出了——全裸展示白嫩巨乳、丝袜美腿一抬、道具玩得那叫一个放得开,土豪花钱看的私密画面 🌙 加入讨论内容点击评论区查看
#交友 #绿帽 #销售 via 免费投稿 我是新加坡华人,想找一个中国女朋友,可结婚可不结婚的那种。一个月15000,一个月我会有那么几天在深圳或杭州。其它时间我们就打打电话视频下。我比较喜欢离婚过的,能在乎对方感受的。另外,我自己有绿帽情节,希望女伴是做销售或者保险或者经常需要去应酬的最好。 🌙 加入讨论内容点击评论区查看
#交友 #男模 #微胖 via 免费投稿 投稿:上海186男模,想找了年纪小圆脸大眼睛微胖胸大双马尾的,喜欢m软妹,最好喜欢穿过膝白丝袜的,如果女孩子害怕可以线下来验证颜值身材,尖鼻子尖下巴瘦的勿扰 🌙 加入讨论内容点击评论区查看
#树洞 #道士 #妖怪 via 免费投稿 投稿社长有一个门哥对我特别好,给我点这点那的,后来跟他视频的时候发现门槛哥是个道士,我现在特别罪过..很回避他我这样跟小说里的女妖怪没啥区别我会有什么报应吗.. 🌙 加入讨论内容点击评论区查看
#树洞 #戴套 #功夫 via 免费投稿 各位彭于晏们,我刚二十多感觉自己软的很快怎么办啊?跟女朋友做的时候戴个的功夫就感觉有点软了,而且戴套进去后也觉得没什么感觉。这正常吗?怎么办啊? 🌙 加入讨论内容点击评论区查看
#交友 #健身 #幽默有趣 via 免费投稿 投稿内容:98年,身高185cm,体重85kg,体脂率16%,沉迷健身,运动,长相耐看,幽默有趣。平时在世博后滩附近,希望找一个固定的p友,平时互相不打扰,要是可以一起健身就更好了,希望你是小美或者耐看型,不要太胖的就好,有兴趣dd互换照片。 🌙 加入讨论内容点击评论区查看
❤1
#树洞 #快餐 #老师 via 免费投稿 投稿请教下各位大哥大姐,我想问一下我想在我们本地开一个月租房的快餐,应该去哪里招聘老师或者这种团队呢? 🌙 加入讨论内容点击评论区查看
❤1
#树洞 #阴蒂 #潮吹 via 免费投稿 社长!我想投稿呀,就是女生性爱是没有感觉怎么回事呀,揉阴蒂刺激的难受,不是爽,就是特别难受刺激,男朋友插进去也没有太大感觉,女上,后入都试过了也没有太大感觉,我每次都是装爽,不敢和男友说,这是怎么回事呀,但是男友用手指就有想尿尿的感觉,男友手都要抽筋了,但就是潮吹不了,怎么办呀,会不会是没有发育成熟才这样啊,这个问题困扰我好久了,我问Al,Al说敏感话题不给答案 🌙 加入讨论内容点击评论区查看
❤2👎1🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @chaseshudong. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 178,073 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“深夜朴社长树洞交友” (@chaseshudong), 20,882 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chaseshudong.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.