Channel
@chasebj_sjda
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
4,178subscribers
-158 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002478684790 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @chasebj_sjda |
| Created | 2 October 2024 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/chasebj_sjda |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 17:55 | 4,178 | -29 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 20:57 | 4,207 | -107 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:11 | 4,314 | -22 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:17 | 4,336 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 2 October 2024 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 5 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 4 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 10 (2 October 2024 – 4 August 2026) |
| Views total | 3,510 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 11:50 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
😀 野寻北京互推抽奖活动第三期已圆满结束 😀 😀 恭喜所有获奖的小伙伴，奖金已全部发放，获奖名单和领奖截图都已公开，感谢大家的支持！❤️ 😀 第四期8月11日晚22：00开奖，快快参与起来吧！ 😀 报名人数越多，奖金池越高！ 😀 不看邀请人数 😀 报名即可参与抽奖 😀 最高可得 2️⃣3️⃣3️⃣3️⃣元现金红包！ 活动方案 :- t.me/ooxxdh 北京交流 : - t.me/chasebj_jlq 北京报名 : 野寻·观川 @chase_gc 双向联系 @chase_gc_bot
😀 野寻北京互推抽奖活动第二期已圆满结束 😀 😀 恭喜所有获奖的小伙伴，奖金已全部发放，获奖名单和领奖截图都已公开，感谢大家的支持！❤️ 😀 第三期现已开启！ 😀 报名人数越多，奖金池越高！ 😀 不看邀请人数 😀 报名即可参与抽奖 😀 最高可得 2️⃣3️⃣3️⃣3️⃣元现金红包！ 活动方案 :- t.me/ooxxdh 北京交流 : - t.me/chasebj_jlq 北京报名 : 野寻·观川 @chase_gc 双向联系 @chase_gc_bot
➠商务KTV包厢预定 ➠高端颜值场，全员05后在线 ➠现场海选，每天打卡180➕ ➠肤白貌美大长腿，好玩不贵，🉑亲🉑摸🉑游戏 #商务ktv #北京摸摸唱 #北京商k #北京商务 #衬衣秀 #海选 #游戏场 #衬衣场 #北京大尺度 ------------------------------- 🔰全北京商K可安排！ 📱📱📱📱✈️：@amdave999 ☎️电话微信：18710171340 双向限制联系：@amdave999_bot 🈺业时间：08:00—06:00 一手资源，价格透明，一次合作，长期选择！
北京商k #北京 #商K 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 🥰为什么说玩商k会上瘾? 因为它真的让人戒不掉🥰是一进门🥵就看到一排又一排年轻水嫩的小妹妹❤️❤️❤️站在你面前😍😍随便挑，随便选🥵像在开后宫， ☺️☺️☺️☺️☺️☺️☺️ 是喝到微醺👋👋👋她突然凑到你耳边，声音又软又甜哥哥🍓🍓🍓我好喜欢你哦，是亲她摸她，她不但不🍓🍓🍓躲反而轻轻喘着气，在你耳边叫老公❤️❤️❤️再用力点，是你说酒喝不下了🥳🥳🥳她直接抢过杯子哥哥你别喝了👍👍👍让我帮你喝。 😃😃😃是花不了多少钱，就能一个人独享好几个小时被美女包围❤️❤️❤️被撒娇，被亲亲🥰🥰🥰被摸摸，被叫老公的极致快感☝️☝️☝️那种又甜又刺激又暧昧又真实的爱情幻觉🥵🥵🥵让你感觉自己瞬间变成了万人迷。 📱 15645600448 🚀 @xiaobo97 📱频道链接 @beijingmmb
✒️🧡🧡💚🖤为啥你玩的商K和别人不一样🔥🔥🔥散客踩坑的真相! 🉑🉑🉑很多兄弟纳闷为啥听别人说商K好玩👅自己去了却处处碰壁🍓核心原因就在于你是散客，没搞懂门道! ☺️☺️☺️☺️☺️☺️☺️💙💙 😎😎直接上门=大概率碰壁!!!! 🍓知道地址就冲过去🍓十有八九没包厢，甚至直接被拒!很多场子怕被查🍓怕接待散客添麻烦🤗只做预定熟客的生意，散客就是“门外汉”。 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀💙💙 散客体验=货不对板 就算有场子接待你❤️体验也和别人说🪩的差十万八千里🪩人家预定的是优质演员👋专属服务你碰的是挑剩下的资源，能一样才怪! 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀💙 核心心态=别关注演员😀 🌍记住!你是来消费的👉不是来谈心的没必要📱问演员想说啥📱📱📱📱想干啥，盯紧自己的体验 就行📱📱合不来就换，别委屈自己! 🚓🚑🚒🚐🛻 📱 @KIS996688 😵 19333076402 📱 https://t.me/SKI92588 #北京商k #北京游戏场 #北京ktv
野寻·北京商家档案 pinned a photo
😀 野寻北京SB撒币互推活动强势来袭~ 😀 1⃣️ 报名多奖金多，掏空野寻小金库 报名参与人数越多 → 总奖金池越高 2️⃣0️⃣ 人 → 总奖金 💴5️⃣8️⃣8️⃣ 3️⃣5️⃣人 → 总奖金 💴1️⃣8️⃣8️⃣8️⃣ 5️⃣0️⃣人 → 总奖金 💴3️⃣8️⃣8️⃣8️⃣ 8️⃣0️⃣人 → 总奖金 💴5️⃣8️⃣8️⃣8️⃣ 1️⃣0️⃣0️⃣人 → 总奖金 💴6️⃣6️⃣6️⃣6️⃣ 2⃣️ 不看邀请人数，符合条件都可以 不看邀请人数，报名参与即可，奖金多少纯看运气 🤔 女生参与条件： 频道/群组人数200+ 频道/群组首个有效帖子的时间>30天 通过野寻验证 在个人频道放置活动宣传贴 🥰 男生参与条件： 北京交流群 积分200分+ 在个人频道放置活动宣传贴 在个人主页放置野寻交流群链接 3⃣️ 福利全凭运气，拼手气得大红包 😀 活动通知开奖时间发出拼手气红包，按照抢到红包的大小排名 拼手气第1️⃣名领取总奖…
野寻·北京商家档案 pinned Deleted message
😀 野寻 · 北京修车导航 😀 ~紫禁风轻月色柔，京华邂逅意相投~ ~天涯若得知心友，不负人间一段秋~ 新手中心 : 😀【野寻 · 北京使用手册】 😀 野寻大讲堂 └ 作业模版 └ 积分商城 └ 野寻金币 └ 会员制度 └ 工兵模版 😀 北京榜单导航 └ 按价格 └ 按区域 └ 按服务 └ 按标签 😀 其他资源 └ 野寻· 北京外围 └ 野寻· 北京包养 └ 野寻· 北京商家 ⚡【野寻· 北京】榜单结构 ├ 学生交流群 @chasebj_jlq ├ 打卡通告群 @chasebj_tgq ├ 小喇叭 @chasebj_xlb ├ 榜单导航 @chasebj_bddh ├ 修车档案 @chasebj_lsda ├ 作业评价 @chasebj_zypj ├ 活动公告 @chasebj_hdgg ├ 官方入口 @bj_ooxx ├ 更多友群 @ooxxdh …
Channel created
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @chasebj_sjda. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 820,295 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“野寻·北京商家档案” (@chasebj_sjda), 4,178 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chasebj_sjda.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.