🕹"Do or Die" 70 Days Study Challenge to cover 100% Syllabus | Change your Nov 26 Results "NOW" https://youtu.be/HOryl0cN_Lk 👆👆( watch this video) 🎰 Slots Available: Only few CAmentoringprogram.org 💁♂ By Dr CA Ravie Agarwal https://wa.me/918334866117 Note : Even if you are zero now then also It's possible 70 Days Ultimate Study Challenge for Nov 26 CA Final https://youtu.be/HOryl0cN_Lk Join us at Chartered Achie…

Channel
Chartered Achievers
@charteredachievers
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
20,401subscribers
+387 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001587284013 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @charteredachievers |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/charteredachievers |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 21:17 | 20,401 | +29 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 11:28 | 20,372 | +37 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 07:35 | 20,335 | +44 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 05:13 | 20,291 | +40 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 08:11 | 20,251 | +30 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 10:29 | 20,221 | +19 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 20:53 | 20,202 | +27 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 08:06 | 20,175 | +30 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 01:24 | 20,145 | +8 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 00:41 | 20,137 | +11 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 23:02 | 20,126 | +8 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 01:31 | 20,118 | +51 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 02:51 | 20,067 | +44 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:14 | 20,023 | +9 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:31 | 20,014 | first reading |
Engagement
35 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 9.98%
- avg views ÷ 20,401 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2,040
- 34 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.131%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 35
- of 35 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 28 of 34 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 35 (3 August 2026 – 13 August 2026) |
| Views total | 69,247 |
| Reactions total | 82 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 14:33 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 1m 00s
- Average length
- 15s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
82 reactions across 27 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 36 | 43.9% | |
| ❤ | 27 | 32.9% | |
| 🔥 | 9 | 11.0% | |
| 🙏 | 6 | 7.32% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 2.44% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 1.22% | |
| 🫡 | 1 | 1.22% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 28 of the 35 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 82reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 35 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Join Largest CA/CS/CMA Chartered Achievers Network For all Resources, Notes, Update & Discussion https://t.me/addlist/mnsi9r_GcHQ3MmZl WhatsApp channel👇 https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Vb8J83lEgGfVUxDao82d WhatsApp Discussion group👇 https://chat.whatsapp.com/EyCUbHiiJ8mC4nBtJEDffc?s=cl&p=a&ilr=1 YouTube Channel👇 https://youtube.com/@charteredachievers?si=xlLc6bXrFfUIUR-P CA All Notes & Update👇 https://t.me/cha…
Do or Die" 70 Days Study Challenge to cover 100% Syllabus | Change your Nov 26 Results "NOW" https://youtu.be/HOryl0cN_Lk 👆👆 Click on the link to watch https://wa.me/918334866117 Join us at Chartered Achievers- Channel & Group! Join - CA FINAL TARGET NOV 26
🚀 The Batch Every Serious CA & CMA Student Should Join! Latest Updated Regular Batch for CA | CMA Inter & Final by CA Aadiityaa Jain. ✨ Latest Updated Recordings ✨ Complete Subject Mentorship ✨ Live Doubt Support ✨ Revision Classes ✨ 5 Mock Test Papers NO SHORTCUT. 100% COVERAGE FOR 100% MARKS. 📞 9111956595 | 🌐 www.aadiityaajain.com Join us at Chartered Achievers- Channel & Group! Join - CA FINAL TARGET NOV 26
👍1
IBS Trend Analysis 📚 JOIN US AT IBS 📚 📢 Channel: @IBSNOTES6 👥 Group: @PAPER6IBS Join us at Chartered Achievers ❤️ Channel & Group Join - CA FINAL TARGET GROUP
❤1👍1
CA Final IDT Last 6 Attempt Trend Analysis JOIN US AT IDT📚 Channel: @CAFINALIDTNOTE 👥 Group: @CA_FINAL_IDT Join us at Chartered Achievers ❤️ Channel & Group Join - CA FINAL TARGET GROUP
👍2❤1🙏1
📌CA Final Nov 2026: STOP Studying Like a Normal Student! https://youtu.be/_Jpr1sr1Y_c?si=oVQFRbOmM1i89E2J 👆👆📣 https://wa.me/918334866117 Join us at Chartered Achievers- Channel & Group! Join - CA FINAL TARGET NOV 26
❤1👍1
⚡ *Fastest-growing companies can't be valued using traditional method such as DCF.* Introducing a course built specifically to value New Age Startups like Blinkit, Zomato, Netflix & Claude/AI companies. 📚 Learn to value assets such as: ✅ Patents & trademarks ✅ Proprietary AI models ✅ Customer relationships & brand equity ✅ Real case studies: Blinkit, Netflix, Claude/AI companies 🎯 Limited to 20 students - to ensur…
👍1💯1🔥1
CA Final DT Last 6 Attempt Trend Analysis JOIN US AT DT📚 Channel: @CAFINALDTNOTE 👥 Group: @CA_FINAL_DT Join us at Chartered Achievers ❤️ Channel & Group Join - CA FINAL TARGET GROUP
CA Final Audit Last 6 Attempt Trend Analysis JOIN US AT AUDIT📚 Channel: @CAFINALAUDITNOTE 👥 Group: @CA_FINAL_AUDIT Join us at Chartered Achievers ❤️ Channel & Group Join - CA FINAL TARGET GROUP
👍1
CA Final AFM Last 16 Attempt Trend Analysis 📚 JOIN US AT AFM 📢 Channel: @CAFINALAFMNOTE 👥 Group: @AFM_CA_FINAL Join us at Chartered Achievers ❤️ Channel & Group Join - CA FINAL TARGET GROUP
👍1
CA Final FR Last 16 Attempt Trend Analysis JOIN US AT FR 📚 📢 Channel: @CAFINALFRNOTE 👥 Group: @CA_FINAL_FR Join us at Chartered Achievers ❤️ Channel & Group Join - CA FINAL TARGET GROUP
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 35 posts we hold for @charteredachievers. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 125,265 of 1,584,733entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@charteredachievers1 · 35,30930 postsIBS Study Group (Chartered Achievers)
@paper6ibs · 11,3017 postsACCA Notes & Updates (Chartered Achievers)
@acca_notes_acheivers · 6892 postsCA CS CMA Articleship & Industrial Training (Achieves)
@CAarticleship_Achievers · 4,5282 postsCA INTER ACHIEVERS
@cainterachievers · 10,7552 postsCA CS CMA JOB & Campus Updates
@cajob_campus · 6,5632 postsCS Notes & Updates (Chartered Achievers)
@csnotesachivers · 2,6802 postsAce Your CA
@aceyourca · 7841 postDr CA Ravie Agarwal
@caraviagarwaloriginal · 26,9521 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@air1ca · 154,468
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 19 August 2026
@aakashkandoi_FR · 104,796
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 19 August 2026
@pratikjagati · 56,411
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 23 August 2026
@cafinalsankalpcosting · 55,831
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 23 August 2026
@ClearCAWithSK · 113,017
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 19 August 2026
@BBSIRDT · 202,388
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 19 August 2026
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Chartered Achievers” (@charteredachievers), 20,401 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/charteredachievers.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.