@icemusicz
❤5

Channel
@chart_baaz
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,950subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001642508900 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @chart_baaz |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 27 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/chart_baaz |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Aug 2026, 12:58 | 2,950 | -6 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 10:28 | 2,956 | +1 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 16:06 | 2,955 | +1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 05:51 | 2,954 | +8 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:44 | 2,946 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:17 | 2,949 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:05 | 2,949 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 24 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
636 reactions across 19 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 376 | 59.1% | |
| 👍 | 223 | 35.1% | |
| 👎 | 37 | 5.82% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 636reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 24 May 2026 to 21 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
@icemusicz
❤5
You didn’t miss it, guys. Relax. Even in the most bullish scenario, I still expect price to revisit below $60K. #BTC #Bitcoin #NFA
👍30❤5👎1
@icemusicz
❤7👎1
$BTC | $USD After a long time, we can finally identify a potential buying zone on the chart #BTC #Bitcoin #NFA
👍39❤12👎6
$BTC | $USD Looks like price might bounce a bit from here. If you're in a short, it could be a good idea to close it before price reaches the red zones. #BTC #Bitcoin #NFA
❤46👍12👎3
به عنوان یه چارتیست عرض می کنم که تحلیل تکنیکال نهایتا ۲۰ درصدِ قصه سرمایه گذاری ه؛ بقیهاش یعنی مدیریت ریسک، تحلیل بنیادی، سبد تخصیص دارایی، درک تورم، شخصیت و دانش مالی و کلی فاکتور دیگه هست که باید لحاظ بشن. خلاصه اینکه بیخیالِ وسواسِ «نقطهزنی» و پیشبینیهای قطعی برای ورود و خروج بر اساس چارت بشید؛ چون هر استراتژی یه جاهایی بالاخره میلنگه و خطا داره(وین ریت). توی بازار، دنبالِ قلهخوانی و درهزنی تخیلی نباشید؛ ا…
❤64👎1
نبی هم بی سر و صدا یه کانال زده مطالبش هم جذابه هم بنظر تخصصی و علمی (خودم سر در نمیارم) برید عضو شید استفاده کنید مخصوصا اینایی که اینجا دیسلایک میدن 😂 https://t.me/Web3_NabiYok
👍17❤4👎3
آیا از فلیپ شدن اتریوم توسط تتر تعجب کردید!؟ 😅 حق دارید اگر تو گروه نبودین! تحلیل هایی که قابلیت Hate گرفتنشون بالاس رو تو گروه میذارم ارائه شده در گروه خصوصی سپتامبر و گروه عمومی نوامبر ۲۰۲۵: https://t.me/c/1709957033/222921
❤20👍9👎3
شیطونا همتون مثکه قبلا هشدار داده بودین که! فقط انقد دو پهلو و قصه طور توییت میزدین که از فهم ما خارج بود متاسفانه نمی دونم چرا فقط اسم ما بد در رفته تارگت نزولی میدیم شما هم میدین، فقط تو دلتون میگین که فالوئر ناراحت نشه یهو آنفالو کنه خدایی نکرده #BTC
❤40👍16👎2
The Final Countdown: Chartweft VIP Launches on June 8th! 🔥 The campaign has officially ended, and Chartweft VIP will kick off on Monday, June 8th. If you missed our previous interaction campaign, this is your absolute last chance to secure your spot! ⚠️ Dynamic Tiered Pricing (Strictly Limited): ⏳ First 72 Hours: Join the VIP channel for just 5 USDT! 📈 After the first 72 hours: The entry fee will DOUBLE every 48 h…
❤24👎10👍3
$BTC | $USD Charts don’t lie. Emotions do. #BTC #Bitcoin #NFA
👍33❤7👎1
سلام به همراهان ChartWeft ⚡ تا به امروز ۵ پست از ۷ پست ویژه عضویت در CMC منتشر شد و بعد از پست هفتم، رسماً کارمون رو استارت میزنیم. اگر تازه به جمع ما اضافه شدید یا نتونستید ۵ پست قبلی رو دنبال (ریپست، لایک، کامنت و…) کنید، اصلاً جای نگرانی نیست. شما میتونید با حمایت از پروژه ما (دونیت با هر مبلغ دلخواه به آدرس زیر) و ارسال لینکش به بخش مسیج کانال، حضور خودتون رو در کانال سیگنال نهایی کنید. قدمتون روی چشم! 🙏✨ TRC2…
❤28👍2👎1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @chart_baaz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Chart Baz | چارت باز” (@chart_baaz), 2,950 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chart_baaz.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.