There's still crowd in here. I'm onto something... Ai trading. People said that Ai is the LAST evolutionary invention from humanity. What do you think? π
β€15π4π³3π2

Channel
@charliesharpentry
On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Polls Β· Telegram's recommendations Β· Cite this entry
2,300subscribers
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 1,000β3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002230868324 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @charliesharpentry |
| Description | off |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 15 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 1 |
| On Telegram | t.me/charliesharpentry |
Growth history is still building. We hold one measurement for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart β so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 13:46 | 2,300 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 8 October 2025 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegramβs own channel header, read 15 August 2026 β not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
178 reactions across 20 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| β€ | 81 | 45.5% | |
| π₯ | 51 | 28.7% | |
| π | 10 | 5.62% | |
| π₯° | 9 | 5.06% | |
| π | 8 | 4.49% | |
| π | 7 | 3.93% | |
| β‘ | 3 | 1.69% | |
| π | 3 | 1.69% | |
| π³ | 3 | 1.69% | |
| π€© | 3 | 1.69% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 178reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 October 2025 to 20 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
There's still crowd in here. I'm onto something... Ai trading. People said that Ai is the LAST evolutionary invention from humanity. What do you think? π
β€15π4π³3π2
Anyone still trade here? π
π₯14β€6π2
β οΈ ATTENTION βοΈβοΈβοΈ Today is the LAST DAY Charlie will be sharing the investor password, everyone. Itβs also the final day of preparation before the market opens next week. For those who havenβt received the investor password yet or still want full details about the copy trading, before the password gets RESET, click COPYTRADE CHARLIE Donβt miss out π₯
β€4π€©3π₯°2π1π1
Charlie opens the INVESTOR PASSWORD π First of all, sorry for being busy and inactive for a while β Iβm back now and fully active again. For those of you still on the fence, nowβs the time to see REAL TRADING. π Youβll be able to see: Real-time entries & exits Lot size & risk management Real profit & drawdown β no filters β No edits β No tricks β No empty talk β° LIMITED ACCESS Investor password is only open: β¦
β€2
Are you READY for the next move? ππ°
The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
π5π₯2β€1
Hey everyone β quick one. Sorry I went quiet for a bit, had some unavoidable family matters to handle. Iβm back now and this channel is going FULL POWER with solid signals π₯π If you muted the channel, unmute it now β weβre here to make serious money. Letβs get to work. πͺπ
β€7π₯2π₯°2
π
β€8β‘3π2π1
Choose 1 answer. I ...
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
β€2π1π₯1π₯°1
Who want to trade with me today?
β€5π₯3π1π1π1
Hi.
β€9π₯5π1π1π₯°1
Because it's already TP! Hehe 70pips sharp done. Enjoy! π€
β€6π₯2
Hey? Did you guys entry with me? π
β€4π₯3π1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @charliesharpentry. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A pollβs figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Are you READY for the next move? ππ°
The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Choose 1 answer. I ...
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only β there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each optionβs share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each optionβs own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 October 2025 to 20 April 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind β an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results β and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly β each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseβs query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegramβs list for THAT channel, not this one β see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βCharlie Sharp Entry πβ (@charliesharpentry), 2,300 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/charliesharpentry.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.