https://twitter.com/i/spaces/1djGXlYwdkeGZ Join!

Channel
Charity Kiss Official
@charitykiss
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
227subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001555121880 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @charitykiss |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 12 May 2022 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 9 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/charitykiss |
Topic
Art & design — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 30 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 85% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Sept 2026, 23:57 | 227 | -1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 15:55 | 228 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:16 | 229 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:34 | 229 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 12 May 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 January 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 19s
- Average length
- 10s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
159 reactions across 16 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 101 | 63.5% | |
| ❤ | 25 | 15.7% | |
| 🔥 | 25 | 15.7% | |
| 🐳 | 6 | 3.77% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 1.26% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 159 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 May 2022 to 24 January 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Photo, posted without a caption
#meettheteam Viktoria Stepanova, @Charitykiss_com Curator and Art Manager 📌 💡 Viktoria has a vast experience in implementing art projects as a producer, curator, and a talent manager.
❤2
#meettheteam 👩 Anna Antonova, Charitykiss_com Producer, http://Collab.art Creative Producer Anna is creative communications and marketing professional 💡 Experience: 10+ years 🤝 Partners and clients: CreditSuisse SocieteGenerale Bulgariofficial PUMA Hermes_Paris
👍5
Crypto Philanthropy ❓ New sources of wealth often change how philanthropy works. #Cryptodonors have already begun to make their mark. In 2018, a person (or persons) calling themselves Pine gave 5,104 #Bitcoin to 60 charities entirely anonymously.
👍3
Hello, community! 🙋 Our Charity Kiss JEWELS AIRDROP recently ended and we would like to thank everyone who participated! 🎉 We chose 100 winners who we will contact during the day via telegram, to confirm the wallet you left in the form 📨 ⚠️Beware of scammers! Carefully look at the nickname on Telegram, from which you'll receive this message -Account from which you will be contacted on telegram @charity_kiss_mana…
👍7
Hey guys! Thank you for participation! We are now shortlisting the winners and will announce the results in the next few days. Stay tuned!
👍1
💎Charity Kiss JEWELS AIRDROP! CLAIM ONE JEWEL OF ONE HUNDRED Unique AI generated Masterpieces for Charity Kiss Community Members FOR FREE — Every life is precious, every art piece symbolises one Soul – Every Art is Unique with different level of rarity – Made by Machine Learning inspired by Gustav Klimt 🗓 Deadline: August 7 ‘22 Conditions: — Join on Telegram — Follow on Twitter — Join our Discord Utility: – ACC…
👍39❤6🐳6🔥6
Charity Kiss Jewelry Collection Whitelist is open! 💎 100 NFTs made by a neural network based on paintings by Gustav Klimt. Fill in this form and wait for the results👉🏻 https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1oTGidcElbSRfd55XzUNyE4Np5GP85xS9oMHXMu4XFqQ/edit?usp=sharing Good luck!
👍4❤3
Charity Kiss Official pinned Deleted message
Our passion is to use web3 technologies to change the web 2.0 game, creating next-gen social responsibility. Charity Kiss is the perfect example of our approach. ©️ Andrei Trubetskoy
👍30
Why us? Three funds came together with the same goal of helping people with rare diseases, using a new mechanic of interaction with the help of NFT. 📌 When others reason, we act 📌 When others study a problem - we help Results are the most important part of our work. Soon you'll be able to join us in saving lives around the world. Are you ready? Charity Kiss
👍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @charitykiss. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 3
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 3
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@charitykiss named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Charity Kiss Official” (@charitykiss), 227 subscribers as measured 29 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/charitykiss.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.