Channel
@chaozhi_5
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
6,027subscribers
+257 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003084216333 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @chaozhi_5 |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/chaozhi_5 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 13:02 | 6,027 | +98 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 02:14 | 5,929 | +84 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 14:27 | 5,845 | +72 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:21 | 5,773 | +3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:31 | 5,770 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:18 | 5,770 | first reading |
40 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 40 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 40 (7 August 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 6,519 |
| Reactions total | 3 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 03:48 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
3 reactions across 3 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 40 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
悦悦 丰台 宋家庄 中小 4️⃣颗⭐️ 见到悦悦后非常满意，人照一致，颜值身材都很棒。老师穿着低胸吊带，显示出傲人的身材。进门就给了大大的拥抱，帮忙拿包换鞋，像极了女朋友。教室环境优美，很温馨，老师整理的干干净净。 交水费冲洗后，老师帮忙擦擦拭👍，全程贴心照顾。床上活力奔放，全套服务一丝不苟，非常敬业。口技了得，本人一般很少能被口出来，这次123了。 中场休息，悦悦会陪聊帮你拿手机，忙前忙后，一口一个老公的叫着。后面受不了，没有失望，性价比极高，强力推荐。见到悦悦后非常满意，人照一致，颜值身材都很棒。老师穿着低胸吊带，显示出傲人的身材。进门就给了大大的拥抱，帮忙拿包换鞋，像极了女朋友。教室环境优美，很温馨，老师整理的干干净净。 交水费冲洗后，老师帮忙擦擦拭👍，全程贴心照顾。床上活力奔放，全套服务一丝不苟，非常敬业。口技了得，本人一般很少能被口出来，这次123了。 中场休息，悦悦会陪聊帮你拿手机，忙前忙后，一口一个老公的叫着。后面…
悦悦 丰台 宋家庄 中小 4️⃣颗⭐️ 悦悦老师，进门后 老师很贴心的给我一瓶水，见面之后真人跟照片没有差距，老师穿着的黑色情趣内衣，老师前凸后翘的身材完美显现出来了。然后就是交水费，洗澡。洗澡的时候老师帮我洗然后我揉着老师的胸，不得不说老师的胸真的很大，我选了一套白丝。然后我趴在床上，老师开始进行全身漫游和滚水吸皮，老师的服务真的没得说，这种全身酥酥麻麻的感觉真的只有体验过才知道， 然后正面服务后开始躺在床上后等待老师服务，调情，指划胸推，老师的奶软软的推起来很舒服，老师的脖推也真的没得说我瞬间忍不住了，ls全程情绪价值拉满，服务也到位，离开后我已经开始期待下次见面了 https://t.me/chaozhi_1/6829
❤1
悦悦 丰台 宋家庄 中小 4️⃣颗⭐️ 临时出击了新人悦悦老师，老师新来北京不久，gzs很宽敞干净，人照基本一致，很温柔，🐻不小，皮肤很白很滑。一上手就知道ls有点东西，老手艺人了，说快就快说慢就慢。tt的时候简直像坐进去了，舒服到没忍住直接射了。ls的🐻属实不错，抓起来很带感，期待二刷。小区停车不太好找车位，去的ly们注意一下。 https://t.me/chaozhi_1/6829
知予 丰台 石榴庄 中小 4️⃣颗⭐️ 二刷知予宝宝，新gzs更加干净且温馨，隔音超好，小区无门禁进出安全方便。知予宝宝真人比照片更漂亮更有韵味，服务态度和水准也绝对一流，陪🛀、指划、毒🐉、🐻推、口秀、臀推样样到位，欲仙欲死般享受，相信这么优质的老师迟早会上五星！ https://t.me/chaozhi_1/6573
七七 丰台 宋家庄 中小 4️⃣颗⭐️ 出差结束了，不知道什么时候才能再来北京找七七老师了，cj了几次，还是她让我印象最深刻，fw水准爆满，情绪价值很足，调情技术杠杠的 https://t.me/chaozhi_1/6354
https://t.me/chaozhi_1/6057
苏欣 朝阳 立水桥南 大活 北边很不错的ls 会主动问你需要那个制服 水多 很会挑逗 南方妹妹就是可爱 也会找话题 情商很高 满意 https://t.me/chaozhi_1/6057
七七 丰台 宋家庄 中小 4️⃣颗⭐️ 看到群里聊的七七老师，去看了照片，cj了，见到本人感觉比照片好看，洗澡会帮忙擦身体，主动投怀，在怀里撒娇，fw反差很强 https://t.me/chaozhi_1/6354
以沫 朝阳 大悦城 中大 上周末cj了ls，第二次去了，位置地铁很方便，遥控上楼，胸真的大，助浴完进AB面，AB面的时候一直在抓没放开过，第一次完事之后还能按摩，ls很好沟通，沟通完调整好手法第二次也很快出货，好评 https://t.me/chaozhi_1/1168
小幺妹 昌平 立水桥 大活 4️⃣颗⭐️ 朋友推荐 cj小夭妹进门很热情皮肤很好，帮助洗浴全程不用自己动手帮擦 ab两面 声音很销魂 然后69 美妙无穷 最后一边🐍🐍一边出货 最后帮洗帮擦完事儿 以后有机会继续🤓 https://t.me/chaozhi_1/6319
苏欣 朝阳 立水桥南 大活 苏欣老师约了好几次，这次休假归来终于约上了。果然难约的老师都是有东西的，老师的口活和服务流程在8张里面算是第一档的。床上的反馈也是巨骚的。叫床声好大的。换了两个姿势出货。还有事后萧！！！还会去的！！！好评！！！ https://t.me/chaozhi_1/6057
知予 丰台 石榴庄 中小 4️⃣颗⭐️ 今天去知予那里，一直约约不上 老师老师满课，今天周日一早上就约 终于约上了 ，老师导航上楼，一进门老师给我一个大大的拥抱，房间很大饮料齐全 ，大热天准备冰水，服务满满体贴，助浴完之后服务开始趴着床上为我按摩 按了一会开始服务，服务期间我只能说是爽翻天，让人欲仙欲死，搞得我欲火焚身，服务内容比很多老师都要强老师的舌头一绝，到正面开始帮我泄火泄火流程就不讲了结束之后我能说很久没有这么爽过了 https://t.me/chaozhi_1/6573
Showing the 12 most recent of 40 posts we hold for @chaozhi_5. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 111,130 of 1,549,704entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“北京超值老师（作业库）” (@chaozhi_5), 6,027 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chaozhi_5.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.