Channel
@changshamomo
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
119,958subscribers
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1001739965394 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @changshamomo |
| Description | 长沙外围【沫沫精选】 长沙老牌商家 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 1 |
| On Telegram | t.me/changshamomo |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 65% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth history is still building. We hold one measurement for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 05:01 | 119,958 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 4 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 10 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (4 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 4,540 |
| Reactions total | 3 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 18:21 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 13 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
4 reactions across 3 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 4 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 4 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🌿🌿🌿🌿🌿🌿🌿🌿 今日【8月12日】选人频道 t.me/CSmomo001 今日【8月12日】选人频道 t.me/CSmomo001 🌿🌿🌿🌿🌿🌿🌿🌿 ♛特惠活动♛ ❶提前预约优惠100 ❷三个月内下单满十次赠送一个九十分钟两次的外围 支持USDT支付 欢迎新老客户下单预定噢 ✿ 𝓛𝓸𝓿𝓮𝓵𝔂 𝓯𝓵𝓸𝔀𝓮𝓻𝓼 𝓕𝓸𝓻 𝔂𝓸𝓾 ✿ ♥️联系沫沫♥️ @CSmomo78 ♥️双向联系♥️ @CSmomo78Bot
【群友推荐】【群友认证】 #极品 #红牌 #对版 艺名： 林妥妥 大胸 身高：170cm 36F 60kg 舌吻 69 胸推 环游 按摩 臀推 丝袜 制服 ●𝕐𝕆𝕌 𝔻𝔼𝕊𝔼ℝ𝕍𝔼 𝔹𝔼𝕋𝕋𝔼ℝ● ☞ 点此 @CSmomo78 安排☜
【群友推荐】【群友认证】 #极品 #红牌 #对版 艺名： 优小夏 在校学妹 身高：172cm 36C 46KG 接吻 69 胸推 环游 口爆 按摩 臀推 丝袜 制服 ●𝕐𝕆𝕌 𝔻𝔼𝕊𝔼ℝ𝕍𝔼 𝔹𝔼𝕋𝕋𝔼ℝ● ☞ 点此 @CSmomo78 安排☜
❤2
长沙外围【沫沫精选】 pinned a photo
❌❌骗子号 不要相信任何主动私聊你的人！！！ ❌❌骗子号 不要相信任何主动私聊你的人！！！
【群友推荐】【群友认证】 #极品 #红牌 #对版 艺名： 泡泡测评 身高：172cm 36c 丝袜 制服 鸳鸯浴 毒龙 69 按摩 漫游 调情 口爆 深喉 舌吻 sm ●𝕐𝕆𝕌 𝔻𝔼𝕊𝔼ℝ𝕍𝔼 𝔹𝔼𝕋𝕋𝔼ℝ● ☞ 点此 @CSmomo78 安排☜
【群友推荐】【群友认证】 #极品 #红牌 #对版 艺名： 幸子测评 身高：176cm 36E 丝袜 制服 鸳鸯浴 毒龙 69 按摩 漫游 调情 口爆 深喉 ●𝕐𝕆𝕌 𝔻𝔼𝕊𝔼ℝ𝕍𝔼 𝔹𝔼𝕋𝕋𝔼ℝ● ☞ 点此 @CSmomo78 安排☜
【群友推荐】【群友认证】 #极品 #红牌 #对版 艺名： 盼盼测评 身高：175cm 36D 丝袜 制服 鸳鸯浴 接吻 69 按摩 漫游 调情 口爆 ●𝕐𝕆𝕌 𝔻𝔼𝕊𝔼ℝ𝕍𝔼 𝔹𝔼𝕋𝕋𝔼ℝ● ☞ 点此 @CSmomo78 安排☜
【群友推荐】【群友认证】 #极品 #红牌 #对版 艺名： 汐汐测评 身高：172cm 36D 丝袜 制服 鸳鸯浴 舌吻 69 按摩 漫游 调情 ●𝕐𝕆𝕌 𝔻𝔼𝕊𝔼ℝ𝕍𝔼 𝔹𝔼𝕋𝕋𝔼ℝ● ☞ 点此 @CSmomo78 安排☜
❤1
【群友推荐】【群友认证】 #极品 #红牌 #对版 艺名： 柳紫妍测评 身高：167cm 36D 24s 丝袜 制服 鸳鸯浴 舌吻 69 按摩 漫游 调情 ●𝕐𝕆𝕌 𝔻𝔼𝕊𝔼ℝ𝕍𝔼 𝔹𝔼𝕋𝕋𝔼ℝ● ☞ 点此 @CSmomo78 安排☜
【群友推荐】【群友认证】 #极品 #红牌 #对版 艺名： 林允恩测评 身高：171cm 36c 20s 丝袜 制服 鸳鸯浴 舌吻 69 按摩 漫游 调情 ●𝕐𝕆𝕌 𝔻𝔼𝕊𝔼ℝ𝕍𝔼 𝔹𝔼𝕋𝕋𝔼ℝ● ☞ 点此 @CSmomo78 安排☜
【群友推荐】【群友认证】 #极品 #红牌 #对版 艺名： 林诗诗测评 身高：170cm 36D 丝袜 制服 鸳鸯浴 舌吻 69 按摩 漫游 调情 ●𝕐𝕆𝕌 𝔻𝔼𝕊𝔼ℝ𝕍𝔼 𝔹𝔼𝕋𝕋𝔼ℝ● ☞ 点此 @CSmomo78 安排☜
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @changshamomo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 845,293 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“长沙外围【沫沫精选】” (@changshamomo), 119,958 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/changshamomo.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.