Channel
@changetransformation
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
4,691subscribers
-11 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001096684736 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @changetransformation |
| Created | Between 1 September 2016 and 30 September 2017— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/changetransformation |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 14:34 | 4,691 | -9 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 05:51 | 4,700 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:52 | 4,702 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 00:19 | 4,702 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 14 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 11 of 12 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 14 (14 July 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 7,224 |
| Reactions total | 51 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 05:28 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
59 reactions across 13 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 34 | 57.6% | |
| 🔥 | 25 | 42.4% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 59reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Юбилейный 15 ПиР! Как правило, там много и про изменения - людей и организаций. Приглашаем на XV фестиваль «ПиР. Практики Развития" (10-13 сентября 2026,Москва, Holiday Inn Сокольники + онлайн) ПиР-2026 - ежегодный фестиваль, который собирает тех, кто работает с людьми, командами и развитием. В этом году мы проводим ПиР уже в 15-й раз. Тема - «Бизнес как искусство: мастерство, вдохновение, креатив». ПиР - это …
🔥3
Posted without readable text
👍2
10 из 13 топ-менеджеров заявили, что им «всё ясно» с трансформацией. Детальные ответы показали: каждый внедрял свою трансформацию В свежем номере HBR (июль 2026) вышла статья BCG «The False Alignment Trap». Авторы описывают ловушку, в которую попадают управленческие команды: ложное согласие о том, зачем меняемся, что меняем и как. Показательный кейс. Энергетическая компания готовится к продаже. CEO уверен: команда …
👍3
🟦5 изменений недели Традиционно начинаем неделю с пяти изменений, которые прямо сейчас перестраивают работу компаний! ⚡️В новом выпуске — о том, как компании сокращают ручные проверки, ускоряют рабочие процессы и дают сотрудникам новые инструменты для принятия решений. 1️⃣«Айтеко» и ЛУКОЙЛ-УНП автоматизировали контроль допусков сотрудников к опасным работам Специалисты Индустриального центра цифровизации ГК «Айтеко…
👍2
Представители бизнес-подразделений наблюдают за попытками проектной команды внедрить новый процесс
🔥18👍1
Лето — редкая возможность остановиться, почитать и посмотреть то, что откладывали с начала года. Собрали в один пост наши бесплатные материалы, которые чаще всего забирали в этом году. Пригодятся, когда рабочая жизнь вернётся на полные обороты: ⏺️ Вебинар про внедрение ИИ и человеческую сторону изменений — смотреть на YouTube ⏺️ Отчёт Prosci Catalyst — исследование 1100+ руководителей о том, почему ИИ-проекты буксуют…
👍7
🟦5 изменений недели Начинаем неделю с новой подборки изменений, которые происходят в компаниях прямо сейчас! ⚡️ Смотрим на них не только как на новости рынка, а как на реальные кейсы трансформаций. На этот раз в центре внимания — процессы, на которые раньше уходили часы ручной работы и постоянного контроля. Компании учат системы самостоятельно составлять маршруты, замечать проблемы в торговых залах, обрабатывать да…
👍3
❗Провёл воркшоп «Диагностика внедрения ИИ» с ИТ-командой крупной производственной компании. Это один из новых продуктов от Prosci Сначала про исследовательскую базу, потому что воркшоп задизайнен не из красивой идеи, а из данных. Prosci опросили более 1 100 профессионалов из разных компаний, которые уже внедрили ИИ в работу. Это около 200 руководителей, 400 тимлидов и 500 рядовых сотрудников. Искали закономерности: …
👍5
На программе «Фасилитатор бизнес-изменений» мы разбираем такие подходы на практике. Например, формат иммерсивного демо помогает участникам не просто обсуждать будущие изменения, а увидеть их глазами тех, кому предстоит с ними работать. А о том, какую роль играет фасилитатор в проектах изменений, какие задачи он решает и почему его работа становится критичной для успешного внедрения, мы подробнее рассказали на прошед…
👍2
🥋 Когда изменения превращаются в борьбу подразделений В проектах изменений часто происходит парадокс: решение создается, чтобы объединить людей вокруг общей цели, а в итоге становится новой точкой конфликта. Например, компания меняет процессы, внедряет новую модель работы или перестраивает взаимодействие между функциями. Сначала все согласны: ⏺«Нужно работать эффективнее». ⏺«Нужно убрать лишние потери». ⏺«Нужно нау…
🔥1
А пока вы решаете судьбу «Пятничного мема», выпускаем новую подборку изменений вокруг нас. 🟦 5 изменений недели ⚡️Рассматриваем их не просто как новости рынка, а как реальные кейсы трансформаций — с конкретными решениями, изменениями в работе и первыми результатами. В этом выпуске — пять разных сценариев изменений: перестройка клиентской поддержки, выход в робототехнику, масштабирование ИИ в госуправлении, превращ…
👍4
Рубрику Пятничный мем:
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @changetransformation. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Рубрику Пятничный мем:
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 669,387 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Управление изменениями и трансформация бизнеса” (@changetransformation), 4,691 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/changetransformation.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.