Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Chanella 🌱

Channel

Chanella 🌱

@chanellaaaa

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

452subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 29 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001239212905
TypeChannel
Username@chanellaaaa
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded29 September 2026
Last confirmed live5 October 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/chanellaaaa

Growth

452453452.529 September 2026 — 453 subscribers29 September 2026 — 453 subscribers5 October 2026 — 452 subscribers29 September 20265 October 2026
3 measurements spanning 6 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 452–453 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Oct 2026, 05:17452-1
29 Sept 2026, 15:22453no change
29 Sept 2026, 14:47453first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 24 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
32.7%
avg views ÷ 452 subscribers
Avg views / post
148
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.50%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 17 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 September 2026
Posts held19 (24 September 2026 – 29 September 2026)
Views total2,811
Reactions total92
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Sept 2026, 15:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

92 reactions across 17 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤5357.6%
🎃1112.0%
👌66.52%
👍66.52%
👏55.43%
❤‍🔥44.35%
😭44.35%
😢22.17%
😁11.09%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 92 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 24 September 2026 to 29 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Sept 2026, 14:37 UTC38 viewsread 29 September 2026
Photo

موضوعات رساله‌های پژوهش هنر واقعا جالب.

Signed Faella 𝄢

29 Sept 2026, 07:23 UTC84 views6 reactionsread 29 September 2026

انقدر خوشم میاد آدمایی که عکسای خانوادگی رو قاب می‌کنن می‌چینن روی میز. من یه سری قاب کوچولو در سایزهای مختلف گرفتم و عکسای قدیمیمونو گذاشتم روی یه میزی که کنج بود، فرداش یه تابلوی و ان یکاد آوردن گذاشتن جلوش. کل خونه رو عین مسجد پر اینا کردن، انگار خودمون و خاطراتمون موجودیت نداریم.

❤4😢2

Signed Faella 𝄢

28 Sept 2026, 10:19 UTC121 views6 reactionsread 29 September 2026

همکار جوان می‌گه: ولی یه فشار روانی عجیبی توی مدرسه و دانشگاه و مدیا در مورد توی رابطه بودن وجود داره. قبلا شاید فقط خانواده فشار میووردن سر ازدواج و اینا، ولی الان توی جمع دوستات می‌بینی همه با کسی هستن و همش تو رو هم پوش می‌کنن که با کسی باشی. اگه پوش هم نکنن، همه صحبتاشون حول محور این چیزاس، یا این مدل محتواها همش میان توی اکسپلوررت و ناخودآگاه روت تاثیر می‌ذاره. اینو راست می‌گه. اون زمان که ما مدرسه می‌رفتیم، اگ…

👌6

Signed Faella 𝄢

28 Sept 2026, 09:05 UTC122 views2 reactionsread 29 September 2026

البتهههه، من زوجای 20-22 ساله زیادی هم دارم می‌بینم که می‌گن تا همه چی گرونتر نشده، زودتر بریم سر زندگیمون که با هم کار کنیم و پیشرفت کنیم و دیگه وقتمون سر ادا اصولای رابطه هدر نره. این نگرش هم در نوع خودش جالبه.

👍2

Signed Faella 𝄢

28 Sept 2026, 08:56 UTC123 views5 reactionsread 29 September 2026

در ادامه، بچه‌ها گفتن شاید به خاطر اینه که نسل ما جلوی چشمشونه. نسل دخترایی که سعی کردن تک و تنها مستقل باشن، تمام وقتشونو گذاشتن درس بخونن و کار کنن و زحمت بکشن و به کسی رو نزنن، با جامعه و خانواده و حراست دانشگاه و کوفت و زهرمار جنگیدن تا حداقل حقوقشونو داشته باشن، فقط در صورتی ازدواج کنن که یه آدم درست بیاد توی زندگیشون و الان توی 35، 45 سالگی هنوز تنهان و به جایی هم نرسیدن. به چشم دیدن که این پروژه در سطح جمعی شک…

❤4❤‍🔥1

Signed Faella 𝄢

28 Sept 2026, 06:49 UTC126 views4 reactionsread 29 September 2026

چند روز پیش داشتیم در مورد این صحبت می‌کردیم که انگار سبک زندگیا و سلایق جوانان داره برمی‌گرده به دهه شصت و اوایل هفتاد. از سلیقه موسیقی گرفته تا مد و استایل و حتی سطح ازدواجی بودن! من از هر 5 تا دهه هشتادی که می‌بینم، 4 تاشون یا ازدواج کردن یا دارن می‌کنن یا کلا تصمیمشو دارن. بعد ماها اینطوری‌ایم که هنوووز زودههه، بذار تا 40 یه تصمیمی می‌گیرم حالا 😅

👍4

Signed Faella 𝄢

27 Sept 2026, 17:53 UTC142 views1 reactionsread 29 September 2026

امروز بعد قررنها رفتم دانشگاه، و هنوز توی شوکم. همه مانتوهای بلننند تا نوک پا 👾 من حتی توی دوران کارشناسی که اواخر دهه هشتاد بود و حراست به لاک ناخن هم گیر می‌داد، همچین تیپایی نمی‌دیدم. خبری شده؟

😁1

Signed Faella 𝄢

26 Sept 2026, 19:02 UTC148 viewsread 29 September 2026
Photo

شباهت بعضی کلمات ترکی استانبولی با کلمات فرانسوی. یه چیز جالب اینکه من فکر می‌کردم okul (مدرسه) در صدر جدول باشه و وام‌واژهٔ école، اما یه جاهایی نوشتن از خود oku- ترکیه ولی نمی‌دونم چقدر درسته.

Signed Faella 𝄢

26 Sept 2026, 15:20 UTC141 views4 reactionsread 29 September 2026

پشمالو و فلافی می‌شه مُفو مُفو もふもふ فرسوده و تیکه‌پاره هم می‌شه برو برو ぼろぼろ باشه می‌رم خب 🚶🏻

😭4

Signed Faella 𝄢

26 Sept 2026, 15:16 UTC128 views3 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Forwarded from @chandra_mukhi

بعد جالبه توی ژاپنی با تکرار برخی از صداها یه مفهوم می‌سازن... مثلا این‌جا: もちもち mochi mochi = چسبناک ザクザク zaku zaku = کریسپی همینو واسه صدای حیوانات، صدای احساسات (!!) یا صداهایی که توصیف‌شون توی خیلی از زبان‌های دیگه هم نیست به‌کار می‌برن و مثلا یه する suru میذارن آخر کلمه به معنای انجام دادن و فعل هم ازش درمیاد :))) عالیه! 😂🤌🏻

❤‍🔥3

Signed Faella 𝄢

26 Sept 2026, 12:13 UTC140 views11 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Photo

جهت تسکین آلامم، ایشونو گرفتم🧡🎃

🎃11

Signed Faella 𝄢

26 Sept 2026, 03:36 UTC178 views8 reactionsread 29 September 2026

از نظر روحی احتیاج داشتم الان توی راه دانشگاه و علم‌آموزی می‌بودم، نه توی جاده به سمت دادگاه جهت بیرون کشیدن پولم از حلقوم کارفرمای فاقد شرف 🚶🏻 زندگی بزرگسالی واقعا NO.

❤8

Signed Faella 𝄢

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @chanellaaaa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

بلو ماری 🌊
@mary_juaana · 19,728
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 29 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Chanella 🌱” (@chanellaaaa), 452 subscribers as measured 5 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chanellaaaa.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.