Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Чемпионат Дамира ⚽️🏒

@champdamir

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,835subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001933411787
TypeChannel
Username@champdamir
Created18 August 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/champdamir

Growth

2,8332,8352,8346 August 2026 — 2,833 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,833 subscribers9 August 2026 — 2,835 subscribers6 August 20269 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 3 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,833–2,835 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 01:402,835+2
6 Aug 2026, 05:062,833no change
6 Aug 2026, 03:532,833first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 21 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
48.8%
avg views ÷ 2,835 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,380
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.61%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held20 (21 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total26,294
Reactions total686
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 16:07 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

686 reactions across 19 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁31445.8%
🤡629.04%
custom 5262824814510362669476.85%
👍415.98%
custom 5239965276279152939405.83%
👏273.94%
custom 5395527028940221634253.64%
💯182.62%
162.33%
🫡162.33%
131.90%
custom 5395488546033249471121.75%
🔥121.75%
custom 5393553826475157522101.46%
custom 530790097731821250381.17%
🌭81.17%
💩71.02%
💅50.729%
🤔30.437%
custom 526023500077048234420.292%

Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 686reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 19 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @champdamir. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 13:54 UTC421 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Я принял решение отправить Евгения Кузнецова в Сибирь

13custom 53079009773182125035

6 Aug 2026, 19:27 UTC815 views30 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Летняя трансферная кампания Ак Барса выглядит так, будто их Колобок на октябрь сдвинул. Заявка на худшие трансферы лет на N. Похудевший с огромного до просто большого бюджета финалист потерял почти всех главнюков и третий месяц делает вид, что им никто взамен не нужен. Тут бы сказать, что теперь клуб, тайно управляемый татарами, вылетит из лидеров, если бы не две ны: 1. Осенью, когда прижмет, вполне можно будет зак

custom 539548854603324947112custom 539355382647515752210👍4custom 52628248145103626693🤡1

6 Aug 2026, 14:18 UTC883 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

До сих пор непонятно зачем убрали Кубок Открытия в начале сезона. (Это как Суперкубок в футболе, но идет в зачет чемпионата) Объяснений было много и ни одного убедительного, кому и чем такой матч мешал. Через год надо возвращать

🫡16custom 53955270289402216345🤡1

5 Aug 2026, 17:36 UTC977 views32 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Пруцев до Локомотива и после — два разных спартача. Если что Галактионов и умеет, так вот таким образом выжимать из камня березовый сок, прокачивая небольшие плюсы игрока до больших. Может, у кого-нибудь еще «ненужный» и «непопадающий в состав» игрок имеется — вы обратитесь в Локомотив ради аренды. Вернется забесплатно апгрейднутым — старше и монарше

custom 523996527627915293918custom 526282481451036266912🤡2

5 Aug 2026, 17:21 UTC978 views29 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Суета вокруг Инфантино учит нас важности быть терпеливым. Проблемой оказались не его приколы один лучше другого, а временная концентрация этих приколов подряд. Каждый диктатор знает, что лягушку надо варить постепенно. Пусть привыкнет: если вас трамвай задавит, вы конечно вскрикнете. Раз задавит, два задавит — а потом привыкнете. Но постепенно. Сразу нельзя огорошить благодарную общественности всеми хорошими новост

💯1611🤡1😁1

1 Aug 2026, 17:47 UTC≈1,470 views42 reactionsread 7 August 2026

А если UEFA теперь выйдет из FIFA, то она войдет в EA Sports FC или в Pro Evolution Soccer?

😁38🤔3🤡1

1 Aug 2026, 11:14 UTC≈1,600 views64 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🚑

😁55custom 52399652762791529398💩1

31 Jul 2026, 10:59 UTC≈1,580 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

За кого болеют в Одиссее Нолана? Жинка главного героя Энн Хэтэуэй весь год яростно шизила за Арсенал и не удивит вас новостью: но она также завербовала в гуннеры Роберта Паттинсона — привлекла антагониста! Сам режиссер долго парил пингвином над схваткой, но все же сдался под напором съемочной группы и тоже примерил красно-белый лондонский шарфик. А вот Том Холланд болеет за Тоттенхэм — как же много это объясняет!

👍115😁3🤡1

29 Jul 2026, 17:57 UTC≈1,560 views38 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Ваш аккаунт был захвачен Казахстаном Дебютный гол 17-летнего Дастана Сатпаева за Челси стал национальным событием казнета: его роскошный проход и удар, напоминающие легендарную шайбу Панова французам, пересылали все и обсуждали везде. Вьюноша за день стал гордостью страны и настоящим Талгатычем. Произошла полнейшая алга. 1.000.000 лайков, 350к комментариев, 26 миллионов просмотров за сутки: казахов даже не смутило

👏27custom 52628248145103626695😁3🤡1custom 52399652762791529391custom 53079009773182125031

29 Jul 2026, 10:41 UTC≈1,220 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Как женская НБА идет к успеху: материал на бусти. https://boosty.to/damirworld Недавно вы о ней не знали, а теперь точно видели новости и мемасы оттуда. НБА Лига Личностей, чья пиар машина способна раскрутить гопника до суперзвезды. Женская НБА захотела это повторить, но вышло совсем иначе — даже в чем-то случайно. Вместо противостояния суперзвезд получился один центр силы, вокруг которого выстроилась система. Моне

🔥12💅5🤡2

28 Jul 2026, 14:36 UTC≈1,240 views26 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Когда бывший судья Леонид Вайсфельд пришел в КХЛ менеджерить, то многих восхищали его хитровыдуманные шаги: наконец-то настоящий мастерюга, умеющий в сложной ситуации выискивать юридические лазейки в правилах! Теперь каждый хоккейный переход использует столько контрагентов, посредников, лиг, договоренностей и сравнительно честных способов остапбендернуть регламент, что Леонид Владленыч тех времен воспринимается уже

👍17🌭7🤡2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @champdamir. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 188,144 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Чемпионат Дамира ⚽️🏒” (@champdamir), 2,835 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/champdamir.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.