Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ‼️

Channel

‼️

@challengesoo

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 18 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003759087089
TypeChannel
Username@challengesoo
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded18 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 25 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/challengesoo

Growth

218 Aug 2026, 06:00 — 2 subscribers18 Aug 2026, 19:56 — 2 subscribers18 Aug 2026, 06:0018 Aug 2026, 19:56
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1–3 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Aug 2026, 19:562no change
18 Aug 2026, 06:002first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 17 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
675.0%
avg views ÷ 2 subscribers
Avg views / post
13.5
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
9.63%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 14 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 14 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026
Posts held14 (17 August 202617 August 2026)
Views total189
Reactions total13
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken18 Aug 2026, 06:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

13 reactions across 8 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🍓13100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 17 August 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

17 Aug 2026, 17:41 UTC8 views2 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

⋆. 𐙚˚࿔ @TheOtherHalf2 𝜗𝜚˚⋆ You got mo ran / erha The truth may not always be what it seems. He carries a sense of pride and nobility, yet beneath it, his heart can still be softened by love and emotion, until tears find their way to the corner of his eyes. Life may be complicated and unpredictable, throwing him into circumstances he never expected. But no matter how painful the journey becomes, he will always find

🍓2

17 Aug 2026, 17:29 UTC8 views1 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

⋆. 𐙚˚࿔ @memoryofmurder 𝜗𝜚˚⋆ You got junwu / tgcf Jun Wu is a powerful and complex figure driven by a deep sense of justice and a profound resentment toward the world. Beneath his calm and dignified exterior lies years of disappointment, pain, and anger. His desire to create a world where justice prevails is deeply intertwined with his own struggles, making him a character whose ideals and darker emotions are imposs

🍓1

17 Aug 2026, 17:21 UTC18 views1 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

⋆. 𐙚˚࿔ @JONKU11YASHA11SATORU11 𝜗𝜚˚⋆ You got nie huaisang / mdzs Nie Huaisang is someone who lives in a world of his own, finding comfort and joy in the little things he loves. He has a deep affection for birds and enjoys collecting objects and treasures that hold a special meaning to him. A poet and an artist at heart, he possesses remarkable intelligence and a surprisingly deep character hidden beneath his seeming

🍓1

17 Aug 2026, 17:08 UTC24 views1 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

⋆. 𐙚˚࿔ @Junkoissohot 𝜗𝜚˚⋆ You got xue meng / erha Xue Meng is a devoted disciple of cultivation, deeply serious about learning, improving, and becoming better at what he loves. He fills his life with the things he loves and relentlessly pursues his goals, no matter the obstacles or limitations standing in his way. He never gives up or backs down easily. His role model remains an important presence in his life, inf

🍓1

17 Aug 2026, 16:54 UTC18 views2 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

⋆. 𐙚˚࿔ @blackvelveto 𝜗𝜚˚⋆ You got jin ling / mdzs Jin Ling is someone who tries desperately to appear strong and independent, even while carrying deep sadness in his heart. Beneath his sharp exterior, he longs for people he can truly trust and rely on. Once he lets someone into his heart, he gives them all his love and loyalty—completely and unconditionally. ────୨ৎ──── شی تصادفی تو،یه مجسمه از یه فرشته‌ست که قدی

🍓2

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @challengesoo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,306,812 of 1,623,166entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“‼️” (@challengesoo), 2 subscribers as measured 18 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/challengesoo.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.