3 measurements spanning 6 days, net +99. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 202–331 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
26 Sept 2026, 04:59
316
+99
24 Sept 2026, 21:22
217
no change
19 Sept 2026, 17:47
217
first reading
Engagement
8 posts held, back to 18 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
38.0%
avg views ÷ 316 subscribers
Avg views / post
120
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
16.7%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 8 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 September 2026
Posts held
8 (18 June 2026 – 23 September 2026)
Views total
240
Reactions total
40
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
24 Sept 2026, 21:22 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
3m 16s
Average length
49s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
187 reactions across 8 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
51
27.3%
custom 5402314988528372802
42
22.5%
❤
38
20.3%
custom 5363823959773054105
17
9.09%
🎉
8
4.28%
custom 5350441795161458098
7
3.74%
👏
7
3.74%
❤🔥
5
2.67%
👀
5
2.67%
⚡
2
1.07%
🏆
2
1.07%
👍
1
0.535%
🤝
1
0.535%
🤩
1
0.535%
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 187 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 18 June 2026 to 23 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Друзья, после небольшого летнего перерыва возобновляется очередной чайный сезон! В планах посетить Юньнань и обновить наших поставщиков дяньхунов, а также посетить фабрику по производству пуэров (и, конечно, снять об этом видео).
Всё больший интерес вызывают различные Хэй Ча - наш корзиночный призовой хэй ча, например, закончился в продаже в течение пары месяцев. Очень хочется пополнить каталог новыми интересными обр…
Кто еще не видел, опубликовали вторую часть видео из чайного тура - на Youtube и в VK. Здесь у нас туманные горы Таймушань, провинциальный городок Фудин, горный поселок Паньси, Уишань, чайные, мастерские, игра на гуцине и многое другое)
Китайцы 29 июля запустили тематический поезд "Национальный парк в Уишань". Сейчас думаю над чайным туром и обращаю внимание на всякие такие штуки-) 8 вагонов, 5 тематических зон, интерьер в стиле и цветах династии Сун. Помимо еды и всяких культурных опытов (например, типичного опыта примерки китайского платья ханьфу), в программе дегустация уишаньских улунов - без этого никуда. Цена от Фучжоу до Уишань от 398 юаней. …
Привет, друзья! Первая часть видео из чайного тура) Тур получился отличным и очень насыщенным, а видео - это скорее калейдоскоп каких-то ярких моментов - все 2 недели вместить невозможно) По традиции - ссылка на Youtube и ссылка на ВК.
Друзья, кто еще не видел, вчера опубликовал видео из Tea Research Institute в Фучжоу (Институт исследований чая) - место, где вывели, пожалуй, добрую половину чайных сортов, представленных в нашем каталоге. Туда меня пригласила сотрудница института, с которой мы вместе учились и готовились к экзамену на категорию "高级品茶师“ - что-то вроде "титестер высшей категории". Получилось довольно информативно - технологии, сорта,…
Друзья, новый чай приехал, всё доступно на сайте!
У нас 4 суперинтересных новых:
Выдержанный белый, неожиданно найденный в чайном туре, 🫖 Лао Бай Ча
Один из самых северных китайских зелёных 🫖 Синьян Маоцзянь
Чёрный (хэй ча) с серебряной премией 🫖 Цимэнь Ань Ча
Красный, настоящая исчезающая реликвия, 🫖 Сун Янь Сяо Чжун
Пополнили свежими этого года — весна 2026:
Зелёный чай 🫖 Юнь У Лю Ча
Красные чаи 🫖 Цзинь Цзюнь Мэй…
Кажется, что видео-контент пользуется популярностью у наших подписчиков) Поэтому смонтировал еще одно - просто один день в Уишань: чайные состязания, чайная выставка, много плантаций и даже шоу про Да Хун Пао) Получилось живо и разнообразно) На Youtube и в VK)
🔥18❤6custom 54023149885283728023👏2
Signed Alexey
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @chainoteka_channel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Чайнотека” (@chainoteka_channel), 316 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chainoteka_channel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
