Channel
@cgxwns
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
52,446subscribers
-21,844 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003086947174 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cgxwns |
| Description | 投稿、商务合作： @sahc3 |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 28 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cgxwns |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Sept 2026, 20:57 | 52,446 | -689 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 21:20 | 53,135 | -281 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 06:24 | 53,416 | -490 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 22:15 | 53,906 | -506 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 00:07 | 54,412 | -558 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 20:57 | 54,970 | -918 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 18:15 | 55,888 | -1,285 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 19:03 | 57,173 | -1,108 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 20:19 | 58,281 | -1,383 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 20:13 | 59,664 | -1,770 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 22:12 | 61,434 | -549 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 23:16 | 61,983 | -413 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 09:43 | 62,396 | -364 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 21:48 | 62,760 | -305 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 15:42 | 63,065 | -391 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 15:06 | 63,456 | -569 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 16:03 | 64,025 | -1,157 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 12:23 | 65,182 | -1,114 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 05:05 | 66,296 | -1,450 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 16:57 | 67,746 | first reading |
304 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 67 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 277 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 304 (7 August 2026 – 8 September 2026) |
| Views total | 110,428 |
| Reactions total | 3 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Sept 2026, 21:13 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 35 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
3 reactions across 3 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 2 | 66.7% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 33.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 304 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 304 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 8 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
伊朗宣称袭击无人艇！美军火速否认：彻头彻尾谎言，又在挑事？ 伊朗称在霍尔木兹海峡袭击美国船只，美方否认。伊朗于7日宣称袭击了一艘试图进入霍尔木兹海峡的美国无人舰艇。然而，美国军方坚决否认这一指控，称其为“彻头彻尾的谎言”。 就在前一天，美国军方表示，美军袭击了三艘伊朗油轮，以回应美国海军军舰遭到弹道导弹袭击。伊朗此前的海上袭击主要针对商船，此次行动被视为危险的升级。这场冲突始于2月28日，当时美国和以色列对伊朗发动了袭击。尽管在6月达成了一项脆弱的停火协议，但战火仍时断时续。随着谈判破裂，双方都试图通过军事和经济手段向对方施压。 战事暂停约一个月后再度爆发。美国和伊朗在约一个月的相对平静后，上周重启相互攻击，霍尔木兹海峡及伊朗南部沿海地区再次成为焦点。本周早些时候，美国发动了轰炸，造成至少五人死亡，也再次将外界注意力引向战争最初袭击中一所学校曾遭波及的地区。特朗普政府似乎在采取双管齐下的策略：一方面以军事行动回应霍尔木兹海峡的…
不管普京怎么警告，都拦不住泽连斯基的决定，要干伊朗不敢干的事 打仗打到这份上，其实早就不是单纯的前线拉锯了。 战场上真正的凶险，有时候不在炮火最密集的地方，而在那些看起来跟战争没啥关系的角落。 天上飞的民航客机，就是这么一个角落。 谁都还记得当年MH17是怎么栽下来的，那两百多条人命至今还是国际航空业心头的一根刺。 也正因为有这根刺在，多年以来不管地面上打得多凶，各国大体上都还留着一条底线：民航的天，不能随便捅。 可眼下这条底线，正在被一点一点往下压。 压这条线的不是某个流氓武装，也不是躲在暗处的极端组织，而是一个拥有正规军、有联合国席位、还拽着一大票西方盟友撑腰的国家的最高领导人。 他不但要动手，还专门跑到镜头前，把话撂在明面上——俄罗斯的天不再安全，谁爱飞谁飞。 这话一出口，全世界航空圈子直接炸了锅。 事情的起点其实并不新鲜。 早在这一年年初的时候，乌军高层就动过一个心思，想要用大批无人机把莫斯科周边…
Telegram必备的搜索引擎，极搜JISOU帮你精准找到，想要的群组、频道、视频、音乐 👉 t.me/jisou2?start=a_7098309153
特朗普要抢格陵兰，冯德莱恩不干了，带钱上门丹麦态度变了 欧盟委员会主席冯德莱恩计划在周一宣布增加欧盟对格陵兰岛的投资，并强化与这一丹麦自治领地的政治联系。这一举措正值美国总统特朗普多次试图将该岛纳入美国控制之际。 冯德莱恩周日抵达格陵兰岛首府努克，开始为期两天的访问。此行被视为欧盟对格陵兰岛及丹麦政府的政治支持，后者已拒绝了华盛顿对该领土的要求。访问期间，冯德莱恩将与格陵兰岛和丹麦的主要官员会晤，并宣布一项新的欧盟资金计划。 该计划拟投资于格陵兰岛的战略领域，涵盖关键矿产、卫星通信和可再生能源。欧盟内部人士表示，新计划将大幅增加对该地区的资金支持，并拓宽获得欧盟资金的领域。 在努克的首日活动中，冯德莱恩表示，这项投资计划将是“实质性的”，但未透露具体金额。格陵兰岛总理延斯-弗雷德里克·尼尔森则表达了希望深化与欧盟关系的愿望，强调双方现有关系的重要性。 尼尔森指出，尽管格陵兰岛于1985年退出欧盟，但该岛希望加强与欧盟之间的“密…
炸药车被烧成废铁，真主党无人机精确命中，以军地道爆破计划泡汤 以色列军队对阿拉布萨利姆的一栋别墅发动空袭，导致两名女性丧生。在卡法尔雷曼，另一栋建筑在炮火中倒塌，四名女性受伤。以军还摧毁了位于纳巴泰耶福卡的甘杜尔医院。由于持续轰炸，这家医院早已停止运营。 医院被毁，使当地失去了一项重要医疗资源。报道指出，美国提供的弹药正在破坏这一地区的基本生存设施。尽管美国斡旋的框架协议已于6月26日签署，名义上要求以色列逐步撤军，但这一承诺至今未兑现。随着以色列继续扩大占领，死伤人数不断增加。 以色列在地面行动中遭遇严重阻碍。以色列工程部队曾试图将大量炸药运入阿里·塔希尔山的东侧地下隧道。以军计划引爆这些炸药，制造大规模爆炸。报道称，其目的是制造宣传效果，让以色列军方可以宣称摧毁了真主党的地下设施。 真主党成功挫败了这一行动，向以军集结区域发射了精确打击型自杀式无人机。其中一架无人机击中了满载炸药、接近隧道入口的军用运输车，将其烧毁。尽管以…
美加关税升级打不停，全球航运遇难题，美国选战再起风云 近期国际领域接连曝出多起热点事件，从美加贸易摩擦到全球航运危机，再到 AI 产业与美国选战风波，每一件都牵动全球视线。 美加贸易摩擦持续升级 近日，美国总统特朗普发文威胁限制加拿大飞机制造商庞巴迪在美国的销售，指责两国间存在不公平贸易规则，还称加拿大阻碍美国银行与企业在加经商。 特朗普强调，“这样的时代已经结束了，如果加拿大想要进入美国市场，就必须在当地生产，停止把美国当成提款机。”美加双边贸易关系再度紧张，局势有进一步加剧的可能。 全球航运与 AI 产业遭遇双重难题 受气候变迁与地缘政治影响，全球航运困境持续恶化。除霍尔木兹海峡局势紧张外，巴拿马运河水位持续下降，通行船只不断缩减。 新任运河管理局局长透露，未来数月每日允许通行的船只将减少至 27 艘，且因干旱发生频率上升，缺水已成为每三年就会出现一次的常态问题。 与此同时，AI 产业的用水问题也引发广泛关注。全球数据中心…
9·11成课本里的一页，美国年轻人反问：凭什么要为不记得的事悲伤 他们不记得纽约天际线中消失的建筑，也不记得机场没有安检通道的日子。然而，这场袭击的影响对他们来说却是深刻而真实的。“我不记得自己第一次听说这件事是什么时候。小时候，它只是我所处世界中的一个既定事实：9·11发生过，而像我这样的人，似乎注定要永远为此感到抱歉。”——24岁的哈立德·哈拉比“我会有一种冒名顶替者综合征。 这并不完全是冷漠；我当然尊重那场悲剧，但也明白，我们其实无法真正成为那份集体哀痛的一部分。”——17岁的卢卢·马尔马拉德·托莱达诺 “这件事深刻影响了我父母的人生。我成长过程中认识的几乎每一个成年人，都受到那场事件的影响，但我对此毫无记忆。它不像是发生在我身上的事。”——26岁的朱莉·弗雷如今，美国有超过1亿人在双子塔倒塌时尚未出生，另有数百万人当时刚学会走路或刚开始上幼儿园。对他们而言，9·11仅仅存在于他人的讲述中。成年人或许仍能清晰记得上…
伊朗导弹直奔美航母！中东美军逃亡，飞机用车拉走，基地拱手让人 海湾的天，向来晒得人喘不过气。 可最近这片海面上飘着的，不是往日商船桅杆上懒洋洋的旗子，而是一股呛人的硝烟味。 有跑船的老水手说，霍尔木兹这条水道走了半辈子，从没见过白天航行还得看导弹脸色的日子。 渔船不敢出港，油轮改道绕行，连岸边小镇的孩子听见飞机声都要抬头瞅两眼，分不清是自家的，还是外头飞来的。 更让人琢磨的是那几张从约旦流出来的照片：好端端的美军直升机，居然被五花大绑捆在大平板卡车上，一路颠簸着往内陆拉。 天上的家伙下了地，这画面搁哪儿看都透着一股子仓皇。 有人打趣说，中东这盘棋下到今天，主角们脸上的镇定劲儿越来越装不下去了。 这不，一场航母遭袭、油轮互轰的大戏，又给全世界抛出了一个新的悬念。 事情要从9月5日那天说起。 新华社当天援引美军中央司令部的通报，伊朗伊斯兰革命卫队朝着正在中东水域巡逻的两艘美国海军军舰连射数枚弹道导弹，一艘是航空…
生锈的美军航母靠港，泰国高度戒备，5000水兵上岸收到特殊禁令 9月2日，生锈的林肯号航母终于靠岸！至此，5000名在海上漂了270天的水兵，终于踩上了陆地。 可泰国林查班港没有迎接船员的欢迎仪式，芭提雅街还头增加了一大批巡逻警车。 而这群船员所获得的，不只是自由，还有一纸禁令：不许嫖娼，不许碰大麻，不许玩摩托艇。 此时此刻，这座以夜生活闻名的城市，却突然对它最熟悉的客人关上了半扇门！ 有人发现，林肯号在驶入港口之时，船身已经长了一层铁锈和绿藻。但这可不只是没时间刷漆这么简单。 原来，林肯号自去年11月就开始部署，原定今年5月返回，结果一直被拖到9月份却还在路上，中间只有关岛和阿曼两次各一天的短暂停泊，而在这期间，连补给都没有，就更别提任何基础维护了。 而对于美军来说，这艘航母已经没有体面的能力了，而船身的脏也不会立刻削弱它的打击能力。 因为船上的锈迹和藻类主要影响的是船体的阻力，水面结构以及传感设备的长期可靠…
370：48！投票结果出炉，特朗普遭多重困境，奥巴马或有望反击 有句老话叫＂外面着火，里头还漏雨＂，形容一个人内外交困再合适不过。 放眼当今的白宫主人，这句话简直就是他此刻的真实写照。 海外那头，中东的火药桶被他亲手点着，导弹在霍尔木兹海峡上空乱飞；家里这边，众议院的表决器一响，一个悬殊到离谱的数字砸在他脸上，让他的算盘打了个稀碎。 更耐人寻味的是，昔日那位曾经笑意盈盈、演讲能把人听哭的前任，最近又开始频繁在公开场合露面，字里行间尽是敲打之意。 这画面就像一出戏剧的第三幕，主角焦头烂额，配角摩拳擦掌，观众席上的选民则一脸茫然地看着油价一路蹿升。 这场大戏究竟会怎么演下去，白宫的这位强人还能撑多久？ 笔者想借着这次投票风波，把里里外外这些事捋一捋。 事情得从那个让全世界都咂舌的数字说起。 据外媒报道，美国众议院日前以370票赞成、48票反对的悬殊比例通过了一份临时拨款法案，把联邦政府的钱袋子续到12月11日，避…
TG必备搜索引擎，新币搜🔍@xbso @xbso 轻松帮您找到有趣的群、频道、视频、音乐、电影、新闻。 👇👇点击下方按钮，快速搜索👇👇
🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 Y3国际 品牌铸就非凡 · 实力绝非偶然 ➡️ 超级玩家赌神附体，狂揽1.6亿，可自行验证真伪 #Y3国际 全网最权威综合U台 全网广告费每月投入高达1000万U+，Y3 无处不在 🌐2028体育官网： 20280553.com TG玩家首选人民币台 不限ip 免实名免绑卡手机号码 🌐Y3国际官网： y30869.com TG玩家首选U台 U存U提出款稳，福利好反水无上限 #大户首选 免实名 免手机号 电子可3000U一拉 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩😀😀😀😀 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 #实力U盘千万无忧 1、 用300U爆奖140万U，成功提款 145万U 2、 反水1700u仅用80u爆奖54万u 成功提款60万U 3、PG麻将胡了爆奖260万u，成功提款210万u 4、PA真人豪赢400万u，成功提款370万u 5、真人百家乐大放水，20万赢走600万U 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀…
Showing the 12 most recent of 304 posts we hold for @cgxwns. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“新闻资讯-东南亚-全球” (@cgxwns), 52,446 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cgxwns.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.