Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 51黑料公告板

Channel

51黑料公告板

@cg52_day

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,890subscribers

-45 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002042691548
TypeChannel
Username@cg52_day
Created22 November 2023measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 30 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/cg52_day

Growth

2,8902,9352,912.57 August 2026 — 2,935 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,935 subscribers8 August 2026 — 2,932 subscribers11 August 2026 — 2,924 subscribers14 August 2026 — 2,917 subscribers17 August 2026 — 2,909 subscribers20 August 2026 — 2,904 subscribers24 August 2026 — 2,899 subscribers27 August 2026 — 2,894 subscribers30 August 2026 — 2,890 subscribers7 August 202630 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 23 days, net -45. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,883–2,942 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Aug 2026, 20:342,890-4
27 Aug 2026, 19:272,894-5
24 Aug 2026, 15:152,899-5
20 Aug 2026, 19:192,904-5
17 Aug 2026, 15:162,909-8
14 Aug 2026, 02:152,917-7
11 Aug 2026, 06:072,924-8
8 Aug 2026, 11:552,932-3
7 Aug 2026, 20:452,935no change
7 Aug 2026, 20:342,935first reading

Engagement

3 posts held, back to 22 November 2023the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 3 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 June 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

10,936 reactions across 1 post, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 74.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍8,12074.3%
🔥2,75025.1%
650.594%
🥰10.009%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 3 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10,936reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 3 most recent posts we hold, published 22 November 2023 to 4 June 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

22 Nov 2023, 06:37 UTC≈47,700 views10,936 reactionsread 7 August 2026

——————51黑料 官方群组—————— 51黑料 官方1群:@cg52_app 51黑料 官方频道:@cg52_day1 解除TG成人内容限制:@cg52_day2 ——————51黑料 联系我们—————— 51黑料 官方公告 👉 @cg52_day 商务合作🤝 @chiguabaoliao9 投稿/问题反馈 👉@qiushui688 51黑料 TG公告板 👉 @cg52_day ——————最新地址获取方法—————— 方法1 发任意邮件至 [email protected] >>> 如遇网站打不开/视频无法加载?可尝试以下方式解决: 刷新网页 - 用最新网址访问 - 换网络4G/5G/Wifi/VPN - 换Chrome/Alook/edge浏览器 (此公告于 2025-9-15更新)

👍8,120🔥2,75065🥰1

Showing the 3 most recent of 3 posts we hold for @cg52_day. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 49,877 of 1,629,372entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“51黑料公告板” (@cg52_day), 2,890 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cg52_day.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.