Channel
@cfi_phi
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
2,889subscribers
-18 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002234986160 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cfi_phi |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cfi_phi |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 17:03 | 2,889 | -7 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 17:22 | 2,896 | -10 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 13:25 | 2,906 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:04 | 2,907 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 01:01 | 2,907 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 28 March 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 May 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
16 reactions across 2 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 10 | 62.5% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 18.8% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 18.8% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 16reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 March 2025 to 4 May 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
😎 AI x Trading, Ano talaga ang nangyayari? Michael Wang (CEO, WAGMI HUB) ay nagbubuod ng 5 mahahalagang bagong pananaliksik na nagpapakita kung paano ang LLMs at mga ahente ng AI ay nakakagambala na sa totoong mundo ng pananalapi. Mula sa mga prediksyon ng stock ng GPT-4 hanggang sa mga desentralisadong trading desk na pinapagana ng multi-agent LLMs. Basahin ang buong pagsusuri sa Twitter: 🔗 AI Research in Investi…
❤10🔥3👍2
🎙 Isang Solana Odyssey: Nakaraan, Kasalukuyan, Hinaharap! Mula sa memecoin mania hanggang sa autonomous agents at sci-fi devnets, mabilis ang pag-usad ng Solana tungo sa hinaharap — at kasama tayo sa biyahe! Sumali sa amin at sa xFractal habang binabalikan natin ang nakaraan, sinusuri ang kasalukuyan, at iniisip ang hinaharap sa isa sa pinakamabilis na chains sa Web3. 🗓 Petsa: Biyernes, Mayo 2, 2025 ⏰ Oras: 8AM PST…
😎 Nahuli ng WAGMI HUB AI ang $VIRTUAL Pump! Noong Abril 22, nakita ng WAGMI AI Insights ang $VIRTUAL matapos ang Smart Money accumulation — at tama ang naging signal! Simula noon, matindi ang pagtaas ng presyo ng $VIRTUAL, na nagpakita ng malaking galaw mula sa unang signal. 🔷 $VIRTUAL +111.71% (presyo noong AI call: $0.597, ATH pagkatapos ng signal: $1.2639) Sa isang merkado na puno ng ingay, patuloy na ginagawa…
📞 Sticker Holder si Pavel Durov ng WAGMI HUB! 😎 Habang sinusuri namin ang mga may-ari ng sticker packs, napansin namin ang isang espesyal na bagay — opisyal na account ni Pavel Durov kumuha ng aming sticker packs! 👍 Hindi masamang kasama, ‘di ba? Paalala: kapag nakuha mo ang aming sticker pack, hindi lang art ang nakuha mo — na-unlock mo rin: • Libreng WAGMI PASS; • Eligibility para sa paparating na airdrop; • Lib…
🤩 Ang Integrasyon ng WAGMI AI x MevX ay Live na! 🔝 WAGMI HUB AI ay mas naging matalas sa pamamagitan ng integrasyon ng MevX, isa sa mga nangungunang trading platform para sa memecoin, na sumasaklaw sa lahat ng kailangan mo para sa alpha-token trading. 🤑 Ang MevX ay nakabuo para sa purong alpha na may mabilis na transaksyon at mababang bayarin sa maraming chain, na nagresulta sa mahigit $30M na kita ngayong taon at …
🎙 Desentralisadong AI On-Chain – Ano ang Totoo, Ano ang Susunod Sumali sa amin, THINK at The Render Network para sa isang masusing pagtalakay sa hinaharap ng desentralisadong intelihensiya at kung saan talaga ito pupunta sa Web3. Mula sa mga awtonomong wallet hanggang sa mga matalinong ahente na humuhubog sa DeFi, susuriin natin ang pinakanakamamanghang mga kaso ng paggamit! 🗓 Petsa: Biyernes, Abril 25, 2025 ⏰ Oras…
🏁 WAGMI HUB para sa Dalawang Nangungunang Narrative ng 2025 🔷 Ayon sa pinakabagong malalim na pag-aaral ng CoinGecko, malinaw ang top 2 crypto narratives sa Q1 2025: AI tokens ang nanguna sa interes ng investors (35.7%), kasunod ang memecoins (27.1%). 📞 Tampok sa ulat ang $TRUMP, $PEPE, at pati na rin ang $FARTCOIN bilang mga pangunahing meme movers. Sa kabilang banda, AI-powered tools ay unti-unting kinukuha ang b…
🏁 Mga Secret Achievement ng WAGMI HUB! 👀 Ang unang rule ng Achievements Maxxxers Club – huwag pag-usapan ang secret achievements! May ilan na nakatago. May ilan… baka hindi talaga totoo? 🤔 Pero may ilang players na naka-unlock na. Walang announcement, walang hint — vibes lang! Kung hindi ka pa, baka panahon na. • Nakita mo na ba ang glitch? • Tinap mo ba ang itlog? • Sinubukan mo na ba ang profile page? 😯 May pap…
👀 Ano ang nasa loob ng "itlog"? Nag-tap ka sa "itlog"... Wala. Tinap mo ulit... Wala pa rin. Pero paano kung may nangyari talaga? Bumoto sa ibaba, baka gawin naming totoo!
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
😎 WAGMI Achievement Maxxxers Club! Ang mga achievements sa WAGMI HUB app ay live na nang higit isang buwan. Nagsimula nang mag-claim, mag-unlock, at mag-flex ang mga players… 🔷 Pero may ilan na ginawang personal ang laban! Inaral nila ang meta, sinagad ang lahat ng limitasyon, at tinodo para ma-complete lahat. Sa ngayon, 1103 players lang ang naka-unlock ng lahat ng achievements. • Sila na ang top-tier na kandidat…
🏁 Alam na ng WAGMI AI ang pagputok ng Fartcoin bago pa ito umamoy ng tagumpay! Ilang araw na ang nakalipas, habang ang market ay parang nagkakalasug-lasog, tahimik na minarkahan ng WAGMI AI ang kakaibang galaw. 🤩 Ang $FARTCOIN — na puro kahibangan — ay nagpapakita ng matitinding smart money signals, at ang WAGMI AI Insights ang unang nakapansin dito. At kalaunan, ayon sa Decrypt, nakita ng $FARTCOIN ang biglaang p…
🏁 CEO ng WAGMI HUB sa AI Summit! 🤔 Noong nakaraang linggo, sumama ang aming CEO na si Michael Wang sa mga nangungunang eksperto sa artificial intelligence sa AI Summit na inorganisa ng UTS AI Society. 🔝 Hindi ito tungkol sa hype — ito'y tungkol sa tunay na epekto sa mundo, mga bagay na muling humuhubog sa industriya at nagtatakda ng bagong pamantayan para sa inobasyon. 🤖 Patuloy na pinangungunahan ni Michael ang m…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @cfi_phi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
👀 Ano ang nasa loob ng "itlog"? Nag-tap ka sa "itlog"... Wala. Tinap mo ulit... Wala pa rin. Pero paano kung may nangyari talaga? Bumoto sa ibaba, baka gawin naming totoo!
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 March 2025 to 4 May 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 694,504 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“WAGMI HUB 🇵🇭 Balita sa Filipino” (@cfi_phi), 2,889 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cfi_phi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.