Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

[АРХИВ] Ꮋᴀᴛᴇ Ꮯhᴀrᴇᴄᴛᴇr ᏟᎰ

@cf_hatecharecter

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

177subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003806191386
TypeChannel
Username@cf_hatecharecter
DescriptionБот – @HaateCharecterCf_bot
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 14 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/cf_hatecharecter

Growth

1777 Aug 2026, 19:10 — 177 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 13:32 — 177 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 19:108 Aug 2026, 13:32
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 176–178 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 13:32177no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:10177first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 14 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
33.3%
avg views ÷ 177 subscribers
Avg views / post
59.0
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
17.5%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 August 2026
Posts held19 (14 June 20261 August 2026)
Views total177
Reactions total31
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 13:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
92
Videos
2
Links
5

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

147 reactions across 16 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54183443476429030306242.2%
👍2114.3%
custom 52786730978037216741711.6%
🤝117.48%
custom 5386315213148538983106.80%
custom 524453309855250738264.08%
custom 588667742136880798764.08%
custom 540485214596919109653.40%
custom 538643980155985788642.72%
custom 537768951006889860632.04%
custom 538634463796948100310.68%
👎10.68%

Custom emoji. 9 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 147reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 14 June 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Aug 2026, 13:18 UTC51 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026

окееей, если есть желающие мы могли бы продать/отдать вам канал единственное, что попросим - не менять тему канала обращаться в лс @RikoInAbyss 🍬  #важная_инфа

🤝7custom 54048521459691910963custom 58866774213688079872

Signed 𝓃ℯ𝒻𝓉𝓉.

1 Aug 2026, 11:06 UTCviews —

Channel name was changed to «[АРХИВ] Ꮋᴀᴛᴇ Ꮯhᴀrᴇᴄᴛᴇr ᏟᎰ»

1 Aug 2026, 11:05 UTCviews —

[АРХИВ] Ꮋᴀᴛᴇ Ꮯhᴀrᴇᴄᴛᴇr ᏟᎰ pinned «–здравия!! как вы могли заметить канал уже очень долгое время забит вп. без всякой информации, тейков и более. увы но с влд мы приняли решение закрыть кф. есть пара причин на то, во первых пропала мотивация у нас обоих. а еще влд писать разучилась из за игры…»

1 Aug 2026, 11:04 UTC61 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026

–здравия!! как вы могли заметить канал уже очень долгое время забит вп. без всякой информации, тейков и более. увы но с влд мы приняли решение закрыть кф. есть пара причин на то, во первых пропала мотивация у нас обоих. а еще влд писать разучилась из за игры в бравл старс. а я просто хз чо еще делать🥺🥺 простите. еще спасиба тем кто подписывался или до сих пор подписан, ее❤️❤️ #важная_инфа

🤝4custom 58866774213688079874custom 54048521459691910962

Signed Ꮓᴇlᴇnᴋᴀˢʰᵉᐟᴴᵉʳ

31 Jul 2026, 15:44 UTC65 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Ненавижу Аластора из отеля хазбин, у него вайб как у загадочного анимешника Дазай кинна. #бебебе #тейк @HaateCharecterCf_bot

custom 52786730978037216745👍3custom 53864398015598578861

Signed Ꮓᴇlᴇnᴋᴀˢʰᵉᐟᴴᵉʳ

11 Jul 2026, 10:32 UTC147 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Заебала Филия. Те, кто ответственен за сюжет в сг, вы укурились? По-вашему, 16-летняя дура, с паразитом вместо волос, смогла одолеть Мари, которая является череподевой? А ещё задрали её фанаты, дрочащие на несовершеннолетнюю. #бебебе #тейк @HaateCharecterCf_bot

custom 52445330985525073823custom 54183443476429030301

Signed Ꮓᴇlᴇnᴋᴀˢʰᵉᐟᴴᵉʳ

11 Jul 2026, 10:19 UTC136 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Ненавижу эту ебучую плесень. Что по геймплею, что по характеру, что по внешности она конченная старая убийца. Ей богу, оставили бы помирать Далию после её первой пизделовки с череподевой. #бебебе #тейк @HaateCharecterCf_bot

custom 54183443476429030305

Signed Ꮓᴇlᴇnᴋᴀˢʰᵉᐟᴴᵉʳ

8 Jul 2026, 06:43 UTC116 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

доброго времени суток. я хочу очень сильно высказаться на счет фандома все ради игры. в этом фд просто невозможно находиться, в нем тебя засрут за все. я серьёзно. тебе не нравится что то? засрут. тебе нравится? тоже засрут. и дело даже, почти не в этом. почему в этом блядском фд, пытаются выставить кевааронов каноном, когда они не канон. черным по белому написано, что они ГЕТЕРО и что у них есть ДЕВУШКИ. люди не мог

custom 54183443476429030304custom 53776895100688986061custom 53863152131485389831custom 53863446379694810031custom 53864398015598578861

Signed Ꮓᴇlᴇnᴋᴀˢʰᵉᐟᴴᵉʳ

5 Jul 2026, 19:46 UTC89 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

почему блять картефию из withering waves так сексуализируют?! это блять буквально как будто лоля, да, у неё есть облик сисястой женщины, но блять порно арты рисуют ИМЕННО С ЭТОЙ ВЕРСИИ!!! вы че блять там все педофилы смотреть такую порнуху? вы блять ебанулись скажите мне?????? я особо не вливалась в лор картохи, НО ЭТО ПРОСТО ПИЗДЕЦ. иногда такое чувство, что всем похуй на что дрчить, лишь бы на мелких девочек. да, я

custom 54183443476429030305

Signed Ꮓᴇlᴇnᴋᴀˢʰᵉᐟᴴᵉʳ

5 Jul 2026, 12:27 UTC97 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

прр. кароче тейк будет про эту гниду улыбчивую, Шериф Тостер (мне похуй что на самом деле по другому. так удобней писать) во первых: с самого начала он был нормальным и даже прикольным (?) челом. типо следил за тем что бы королеву не рассмешили и даже потом помогал игроку! ахуееть. ну я не буду дотрагиватся до той темы когда он убил Биттергигла (💔💔) так как в целом даже обосновано. НО БЛЯТЬ. КАКОГО ЧЕТРА ЭТОТ ПИДОР

👍2custom 52786730978037216742custom 54183443476429030302

Signed Ꮓᴇlᴇnᴋᴀˢʰᵉᐟᴴᵉʳ

4 Jul 2026, 07:55 UTC104 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Я НЕНАВИЖУ ЭТУ ЧАРЛИ БЛЯТЬ! Почему она такая тупая?? Ей ещё пририсовывают смешные рожицы что ей ВООБЩЕ НЕ ПОДХОДИТ и делает ее ТУПЕЕ!! 💔💔💔 #бебебе #тейк @HaateCharecterCf_bot

👍11custom 52786730978037216743

Signed Ꮓᴇlᴇnᴋᴀˢʰᵉᐟᴴᵉʳ

3 Jul 2026, 10:34 UTC99 viewsread 8 August 2026

#вп

Signed 𝖁𝖊𝖙𝖔𝖓𝖆𝖗𝖆𝖋 [𝔦𝔫𝔣𝔭 4𝔴5]

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @cf_hatecharecter. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 551,619 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“[АРХИВ] Ꮋᴀᴛᴇ Ꮯhᴀrᴇᴄᴛᴇr ᏟᎰ” (@cf_hatecharecter), 177 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cf_hatecharecter.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.