Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Керамическая BAZA

Channel

Керамическая BAZA

@cerambaza

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

66subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002600586146
TypeChannel
Username@cerambaza
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/cerambaza

Growth

669 Aug 2026, 08:31 — 66 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 01:32 — 66 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 08:3110 Aug 2026, 01:32
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 65–67 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 01:3266no change
9 Aug 2026, 08:3166first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 1 November 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
123
Videos
13
Links
5

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
28s
Average length
14s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

189 reactions across 11 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
11963.0%
🥰2111.1%
🔥1910.1%
❤‍🔥126.35%
😁94.76%
💔31.59%
💋21.06%
🏆10.529%
💘10.529%
💯10.529%
🤝10.529%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 189reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 1 November 2025 to 7 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Apr 2026, 06:51 UTC127 views14 reactionsread 10 August 2026

А ещё, на лето уже два лагеря зовут к себе, даже ЗП обещают соразмерную моей. Приятно и ценно ❤️

13💘1

7 Apr 2026, 06:50 UTC126 views15 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Снова ездила в детский лагерь на недельную смену. Тяжело прошло, но отчасти из-за этого удалось отдохнуть и переключиться с основной работы, с которой звонили, писали и от которой я просыпалась по ночам в ужасе. Но в течение дня было столько задач, что удавалось не думать об этом. А вот сейчас нужно будет решать, что с этим делать.

10💔3🏆1🤝1

7 Apr 2026, 06:50 UTC127 views15 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

Лезгинка – лучшее решение за последнее время (Я счастлива! Просто ещё не отошла от 15-часового сна)

❤‍🔥123

2 Dec 2025, 14:13 UTC340 views14 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

А такие вазы (и множество других) можно лепить с Полиной, хозяйкой студии, дизайнером и просто интересным человеком: Инста здесь Цены здесь Телега здесь

14

2 Dec 2025, 14:13 UTC308 views19 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

И наконец-то дошли руки показать вам, где я работаю, начну с 1️⃣7️⃣ 🔠🔠🔠🅰️🔠🔠🔠🔠 Само очарование, плюс вайб, современное оборудование и вообще мечта наяву. Это не работа, а сплошное удовольствие. МК разные: ручная лепка, гончарный круг, используются только высокотемпературные, посудные массы... Для праздников отдельная кухня (кто у нас ещё может похвастаться таким?) И мой любимый формат ваз ✨ Эту мы гончарили

19

2 Dec 2025, 14:12 UTC241 views13 reactionsread 10 August 2026

А вообще, много кто не знает, что в 17ceramics я так и попала. Дорогая Лия порекомендовала меня туда, как хорошего специалиста, а ведь мы с ней познакомились на моем мастер-классе... Это я хочу подвязать к тому, что когда мне говорят: так удивительно, что ты делишься всем, что знаешь, за просто так – это не совсем так работает, люди участливы, и мне возвращается в итоге даже больше. И эта позиция закрепилась во мне с

🔥92💋2

2 Dec 2025, 14:12 UTC222 views10 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Работать нужно так, чтобы люди с твоих занятий сами искали тебе работу 🥰:

😁91

3 Nov 2025, 16:04 UTC279 views28 reactionsread 10 August 2026

И хочу сказать спасибо вам, мои папищеки, было очень приятно ощущать поддержку во время курса, меня бросало на эмоциональных качелях вы не представляете как. И я вообще не ожидала от вас такого наплыва тепла и внимания, это сработало, спасибо

🥰217

3 Nov 2025, 16:03 UTC256 views22 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

А ещё большим открытием для меня стали другие мастера – какие у всех разные техники, взгляды, ценности, восприятие мира и как это отражается в том, что они делают. Когда ты сначала смотришь сам, и ничего не видишь, а потом смотришь глазами другого и ловишь ✨восхищение✨ Как бесценно иметь людей рядом, делиться эмоциями, опытом. Как нужна такая среда для развития у нас в городе Наташин лосик (он же живой, вы это видите

14🔥7💯1

3 Nov 2025, 16:02 UTC220 views22 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Что ж, всё! Курс завершен. Ещё вчера я бы сказала, что точно знаю куда двигаться дальше, наконец-то определилась – но сегодня утром весы снова зашатало. Понимание себя стало лучше, но выбор мне даётся тяжело. Мир керамики открылся глубже, настолько, что я снова на стартовой точке, а вокруг неизвестность. Куда шагну? Вопрос пока подвешен

22

1 Nov 2025, 21:09 UTC205 views17 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Она же, в микроскоп:

14🔥3

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @cerambaza. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 393,077 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Керамическая BAZA” (@cerambaza), 66 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cerambaza.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.