Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

✱ parisian, è. ♡. ♪ ‧ velt / 𝟸𝟼

@centwiI

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 15 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003854910162
TypeChannel
Username@centwiI
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 21 February 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded15 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/centwiI

Growth

115 Aug 2026, 03:02 — 1 subscribers15 Aug 2026, 18:55 — 1 subscribers15 Aug 2026, 03:0215 Aug 2026, 18:55
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 18:551no change
15 Aug 2026, 03:021first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 21 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3s
Average length
3s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

437 reactions across 9 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 11.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53301111207892447515011.4%
custom 53553000645981898384911.2%
custom 53550412412790006004610.5%
custom 51998412494183003554510.3%
custom 53303920717799353584510.3%
custom 61273483791113938374510.3%
custom 5784953951346495158429.61%
custom 5330447932124588627419.38%
custom 6127648107699112422409.15%
custom 5289863136877223681347.78%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 437reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 21 February 2026 to 7 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Jul 2026, 03:18 UTC≈2,560 views26 reactionsread 15 August 2026

@genddut's collection : @kucinsg @dewdek @ptembam @kuciqng @rKecup @cmemble

custom 53550412412790006007custom 57849539513464951586custom 53301111207892447515custom 53553000645981898384custom 61276481076991124224

18 Mar 2026, 15:59 UTC≈3,410 views0 reactionsread 15 August 2026

[] temen temen, maaf ya aku ngga akan jawab anon yang nanyain usn atau gift aku disini. Tolong kerja sama nya. Makasih banyak!

21 Feb 2026, 05:20 UTC≈3,590 views61 reactionsread 15 August 2026

✱ 𝒻𝒶𝓋𝑜𝓇𝒾𝓉𝑒 mine, and stopped the earth’s relentless flight. I felt my breath become tremulous thing, butterfly with broken wings. 💖 Trying to reach the sky—yet there you were, ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ

custom 51998412494183003557custom 52898631368772236817custom 53303920717799353587custom 53550412412790006007custom 53304479321245886276custom 53553000645981898386custom 57849539513464951586custom 53301111207892447515

21 Feb 2026, 05:20 UTC≈3,140 views49 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

custom 51998412494183003556custom 53304479321245886276custom 53553000645981898386custom 52898631368772236815custom 53303920717799353585custom 53550412412790006005custom 53301111207892447514custom 57849539513464951584

21 Feb 2026, 05:20 UTC≈2,990 views40 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

custom 53550412412790006007custom 51998412494183003556custom 53301111207892447516custom 61273483791113938376custom 53304479321245886275custom 57849539513464951585custom 61276481076991124225

21 Feb 2026, 05:20 UTC≈2,880 views57 reactionsread 15 August 2026

cause you watch the tv while im watching you .. 🍽️ You were leaning against the old oak’s gnarled arm, tracing 💞⭐️ patterns on your notebook with gentle charm. those sapphirine pools of light ♡

custom 53304479321245886277custom 51998412494183003556custom 53303920717799353586custom 53553000645981898386custom 61273483791113938376custom 61276481076991124226custom 52898631368772236815custom 53301111207892447515

21 Feb 2026, 05:20 UTC≈2,580 views57 reactionsread 15 August 2026

ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ ㅤㅤㅤㅤ ㅤSO , PARIS ? IM IN LOVE 26 @ mere. ♥︎ ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ / morning ‘s gossamer haze and turned my quiet world ablaze. the first glances .. happened in the scintillant glows, aprils gold cherry blossoms. 🧁💕

custom 51998412494183003557custom 53553000645981898387custom 52898631368772236816custom 53303920717799353586custom 61273483791113938376custom 53301111207892447515custom 53304479321245886275custom 53550412412790006005

21 Feb 2026, 05:20 UTC≈1,750 views56 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

ㅤㅤㅤㅤ 20 / romance / 🎂

custom 53304479321245886277custom 51998412494183003556custom 53301111207892447516custom 53303920717799353586custom 61276481076991124226custom 52898631368772236815custom 53550412412790006005custom 53553000645981898385

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @centwiI. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,474,684 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“✱ parisian, è. ♡. ♪ ‧ velt / 𝟸𝟼” (@centwiI), 1 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/centwiI.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.