Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Центр | Новини

Channel

Центр | Новини

@centerUKR

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

120,428subscribers

-3,695 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001483876482
TypeChannel
Username@centerUKR
DescriptionТвій ЦЕНТР опори в цій інформаційній війні. 0% фейків. 100% чесних новин. Працюють професійні журналісти. Запросити друга: https://t.me/+hwXACROChNdkZjBi Повідомити новину: http://t.me/centre_news_bot Зв’язатися з віддділом реклами: @TGimperia
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 September 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/centerUKR

Topic

National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 84% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

120,428124,123122,275.57 August 2026 — 124,123 subscribers7 August 2026 — 124,088 subscribers8 August 2026 — 124,014 subscribers9 August 2026 — 123,951 subscribers10 August 2026 — 123,886 subscribers11 August 2026 — 123,827 subscribers12 August 2026 — 123,721 subscribers13 August 2026 — 123,650 subscribers14 August 2026 — 123,547 subscribers16 August 2026 — 123,432 subscribers17 August 2026 — 123,352 subscribers18 August 2026 — 123,258 subscribers20 August 2026 — 123,170 subscribers20 August 2026 — 123,073 subscribers22 August 2026 — 123,010 subscribers23 August 2026 — 122,892 subscribers25 August 2026 — 122,807 subscribers26 August 2026 — 122,722 subscribers27 August 2026 — 122,643 subscribers28 August 2026 — 122,576 subscribers29 August 2026 — 122,516 subscribers30 August 2026 — 122,457 subscribers31 August 2026 — 122,371 subscribers1 September 2026 — 122,264 subscribers2 September 2026 — 122,181 subscribers3 September 2026 — 122,062 subscribers5 September 2026 — 121,923 subscribers8 September 2026 — 121,683 subscribers11 September 2026 — 121,463 subscribers13 September 2026 — 121,315 subscribers14 September 2026 — 121,171 subscribers16 September 2026 — 121,025 subscribers19 September 2026 — 120,909 subscribers25 September 2026 — 120,428 subscribers7 August 202625 September 2026
34 measurements spanning 50 days, net -3,695. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 119,874–124,677 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Sept 2026, 20:01120,428-481
19 Sept 2026, 03:57120,909-116
16 Sept 2026, 20:36121,025-146
14 Sept 2026, 19:39121,171-144
13 Sept 2026, 02:42121,315-148
11 Sept 2026, 05:41121,463-220
8 Sept 2026, 11:40121,683-240
5 Sept 2026, 03:00121,923-139
3 Sept 2026, 09:59122,062-119
2 Sept 2026, 07:33122,181-83
1 Sept 2026, 08:37122,264-107
31 Aug 2026, 06:56122,371-86
30 Aug 2026, 04:06122,457-59
29 Aug 2026, 04:53122,516-60
28 Aug 2026, 04:12122,576-67
27 Aug 2026, 05:54122,643-79
26 Aug 2026, 05:02122,722-85
25 Aug 2026, 03:03122,807-85
23 Aug 2026, 21:05122,892-118
22 Aug 2026, 07:08123,010first reading

Engagement

982 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 107 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.88%
avg views ÷ 120,428 subscribers
Avg views / post
11,900
576 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.27%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
576
of 982 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 September 2026
Posts held982 (5 August 2026 – 27 September 2026)
Views total6,856,560
Reactions total87,411
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken27 Sept 2026, 10:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈45,600
Videos
≈20,000
Links
≈68,000

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
3h 16m
Average length
38s

Measured directly from 312 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

154,149 reactions across 982 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤬59,62938.7%
😢24,97316.2%
❤20,34213.2%
👍15,0299.75%
😁12,8618.34%
🔥7,6884.99%
🤯6,7204.36%
👎2,6621.73%
💯2,4501.59%
💔1,7951.16%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 982 of the 982 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 154,149 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 982 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 27 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
15
across the posts below
Posts paid on
8
of 982 we hold a reading for · 0.8%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @centerUKR. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 982 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 27 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

27 Sept 2026, 09:32 UTC≈2,070 views39 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

❗Росіяни вдарили по школі у Солом'янському районі Києва На щастя, жертв та постраждалих немає. Пожежу оперативно ліквідували. ㅤ ЦЕНТР 📌 Надіслати новину

🤬31😢7❤1

27 Sept 2026, 09:19 UTC≈3,090 views36 reactionsread 27 September 2026

Зранку був приліт в центральний офіс «Київстар» у Києві, — пресслужба компанії ㅤ ЦЕНТР 📌 Надіслати новину

🤬31😢3🔥1🤯1

27 Sept 2026, 08:27 UTC≈5,210 views89 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Video

Під Києвом дрон вдарив прямо по дорозі з автівками, — місцеві ЗМІ ㅤ ЦЕНТР 📌 Надіслати новину

😢56🤬30❤2🔥1

27 Sept 2026, 08:18 UTC≈5,420 views68 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Video

Цього тижня РФ випустила по Україні понад 2200 ударних дронів, близько 1650 авіабомб і 38 ракет різних типів, — Зеленський ㅤ ЦЕНТР 📌 Надіслати новину

🤬56😢9🔥2❤1

27 Sept 2026, 07:34 UTC≈6,530 views100 reactionsread 27 September 2026

⚡Україна почне масове застосування дронів-перехоплювачів реактивних «шахедів» протягом кількох місяців, — Буданов ㅤ ЦЕНТР 📌 Надіслати новину

👍60😁27😢6❤3🔥2👎1🤬1

27 Sept 2026, 06:20 UTC≈8,360 views94 reactionsread 27 September 2026

❗Великий обмін полоненими може відбутися вже наступного тижня, — Буданов Керівник ОП заявив, що новини щодо обміну можуть бути вже найближчим часом: Має бути взагалі дуже швидко, в найближчому. Я думаю, на тижні.ㅤ ㅤ ЦЕНТР 📌 Надіслати новину

❤90👍2😁2

27 Sept 2026, 05:11 UTC≈9,920 views130 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Video

Момент прильоту у Києві вночі публікують місцеві ЗМІ Мер повідомив, що було влучання у складську будівлю. ㅤ ЦЕНТР 📌 Надіслати новину

🤬94😢31❤4👎1

26 Sept 2026, 20:01 UTC≈11,400 views25 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

📌 Дайджест новин за сьогодні: ▪️У Тернополі шахед підвісили просто над головами покупців, використавши його як елемент декору. ▪️росіяни хочуть розширити війну на інші держави. ▪️Що означають удари рф по дата-центрах і чи можемо залишитись без інтернету? ▪️росіяни вже вкотре вдарили по заводу фармацевтичної компанії «Дарниця». ▪️рф знищила склад виробника морозива «Рудь» у Житомирі. ▪️За вересень було запущено більш…

👍9👎8💔5❤3

26 Sept 2026, 18:11 UTC≈12,000 views88 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

Деякі канали зникли з ефіру на ОТТ-платформах та в частині кабельних мереж: імовірно, це через удари росіян по дата-центрах За оцінками Financial Times, посадовців та бізнесу, удари рф по дата-центрах — це нова ескалація, спрямована на підрив цифрової інфраструктури (банківські платежі, онлайн-торгівля, держпослуги, робота бізнес-сервісів). Пошкодження одного дата-центру завдає ширшої шкоди, ніж обрив окремої кабел…

🤬70❤9🔥6😢3

26 Sept 2026, 17:46 UTC≈11,400 views109 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

🤯 За вересень було більше ніж 2730 реактивних шахедів, більше ніж півтори тисячі збито або подавлено. І, на жаль, значна частина досягає визначених цілей, — президент Наступного року тільки на виробництво реактивних дронів і баражуючих боєприпасів рф планує витратити $12 млрд. ㅤ ЦЕНТР 📌 Надіслати новину

🤬94😢9👎4❤2

26 Sept 2026, 17:41 UTC≈10,900 views129 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Video

⚡️росіяни не готуються до зупинки війни, вони хочуть розширити війну на інші держави, — Зеленський ㅤ ЦЕНТР 📌 Надіслати новину

🤯56💯38🤬19😁9👎4❤3

26 Sept 2026, 15:00 UTC≈11,900 views240 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

рф намагається вивести українців на протести під приводом «негайного миру», — ЦПД У соцмережах поширюють заклики скасувати мобілізацію та провести вибори, а «лідерами» акцій нібито виставляють українських військових. За даними розвідки, рф намагається втягнути військових у протести, дестабілізувати ситуацію та послабити обороноздатність України. ㅤ ЦЕНТР 📌 Надіслати новину

🤬175😁31❤19👍9👎2🤯2💯1🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 982 posts we hold for @centerUKR. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@centerUKR edited 4 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
26 August 2026
Most recent edit
19 September 2026

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Центр | Новини” (@centerUKR), 120,428 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/centerUKR.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.