Sticker, posted without a caption
β€1

Channel
@centedkols
On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Handles named that no longer answer Β· Cite this entry
724subscribers
-246 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003268864054 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @centedkols |
| Created | Between 1 October 2025 and 31 January 2026β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 23 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 23 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/centedkols |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 23 Aug 2026, 22:27 | 724 | -102 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 06:58 | 826 | -144 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:46 | 970 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:42 | 970 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 8 May 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
5 reactions across 5 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| β€ | 3 | 60.0% | |
| π | 2 | 40.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 5reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 8 May 2026 to 9 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Sticker, posted without a caption
β€1
Law Of Attraction Buy! π’π’π’π’π’π’π’π’π’π’π’π’π’π’π’π’π’π’π’π’π’π’π’π’π’π’π’π’π’π’π’π’π’π’π’π’π’π’π’π’π’π’π’π’π’π’π’π’π’π’π’π’π’π’π’π’π’π’π’π’π’π’π’π’π’π’π’π’π’π’π’π’π’π’π’π’π’π’π’π’π’π’π’π’π’π’π’π’π’π’ π 2.62 SOL ($180.3) π 22 161.811 LOA π€ GZUwUp...SSCJ | Txn β¬οΈ New Holder! π² LOA Price: $0.008135 πΈ Market Cap $8 135 437 π Chart β« Trending β³οΈ Events π£ | SOL TRENDING #1
Sticker, posted without a caption
Been busy doing some solo trades haha
β€1
π¦ Share on π and tag @RickBurpBot π NEW: Introducing community /thesis and /comment
Photo, posted without a caption
150x #DEGENS Called in my private at 10k now 1.5M Mc ππβ‘οΈπΈ
Called in my private at 10k now 1.5M
Over 46x on $YEA Congratulations to all our PRIVATE INNER CIRCLE members who joined our last project $YEA π¨βπ³ CA: GbuHq6UTNUp8CaFsoPgUhxpPBnkVXGepDHgFhN2kpump πPRIVATE INNER CIRCLE βοΈ reached our 46x target. Entry: ~26k MC Exit: ~1.2MC Average Return: (46x) If you are ready to join the INNER CIRCLE - @centedkol
π Statistics for our last project: π Project name - DAD π Entry - 23,000$ MC π Exit - 1,500,000$ MC π Total gains 6,421.74% (65X) π Congratulations to everyone who joined!
Who else is making 65x callouts? π¨βπ³ π Within the next 24 hours, we will push our next project, which aims for a target of 50x minimum (with size) More info - @centedkol
Over 65x on $DAD Congratulations to all our PRIVATE INNER CIRCLE members who joined our last project $DAD π¨βπ³ CA: CowyrEtbMX5oT211m3u9ayaBcTknsP2wh2zMWghbpump πPRIVATE INNER CIRCLE βοΈ reached our 157x target. Entry: ~23k MC Exit: ~1.5 MC Average Return: (65x) If you are ready to join the INNER CIRCLE - @centedkol
β€1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @centedkols. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@centedkols named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handleβs history β see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today β not that anything βdiedβ. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant β a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βCented π¨π¦ 100x Gemsβ (@centedkols), 724 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/centedkols.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.