Channel
@celpip_pro
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
4,572subscribers
+40 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002098526873 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @celpip_pro |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 30 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/celpip_pro |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Aug 2026, 04:34 | 4,572 | +5 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 18:24 | 4,567 | -3 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 00:26 | 4,570 | +8 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 17:04 | 4,562 | +7 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 08:16 | 4,555 | +9 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 08:52 | 4,546 | +13 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:17 | 4,533 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:16 | 4,532 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 25 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
186 reactions across 20 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 74.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 139 | 74.7% | |
| 🔥 | 22 | 11.8% | |
| 👍 | 10 | 5.38% | |
| 💯 | 9 | 4.84% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 1.08% | |
| 🎅 | 1 | 0.538% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 0.538% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.538% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.538% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 186 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 January 2026 to 28 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @celpip_pro. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 January 2026 to 28 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Why "Complex Vocabulary" Can Actually Lower Your CELPIP Score One of the biggest myths about CELPIP is that harder vocabulary means a higher score. It doesn't. Raters aren't looking for the biggest vocabulary. They're looking for the right vocabulary. Compare these: ❌ I was tremendously devastated and utterly dissatisfied regarding the unacceptable circumstances. ✅ I was disappointed with the service and would appre…
❤8💯1
🗣 Why Practicing Alone Doesn’t Improve Your Speaking Score You probably have done it. Recorded yourself answering CELPIP Speaking Tasks for a dozen of times. Felt really awkward and still don't know how to improve. Here’s why solo practice stalls you: 1. You can’t hear your own mistakes: Your brain autocorrects your speech in real time. That grammar slip, that awkward pause, that word you mispronounced — you don’t …
❤5👍2
📧 Writing Task 1: The structure that always works One of the biggest mistakes CELPIP test takers make in Task 1 is starting to write without a plan. They know what they want to say — but the email ends up disorganized, repetitive, or incomplete. A simple structure fixes most of this. Here's the 6-part email formula (yes, six — there's one step almost everyone forgets): 1. Greeting Start naturally and appropriately…
❤11👍2👏1🥰1
Photo, posted without a caption
❤2🔥1
📖 CELPIP Reading Part 3 can feel overwhelming because the texts are long, the vocabulary is harder, and many answers sound “almost correct.” But in reality this is one of my favourite parts on the test. One strategy that helps a lot is changing the way you approach the passage. I scored 12 on Reading, so hopefully this does help. A lot of students try to fully understand the whole text first. That usually wastes a …
❤4💯3
📚 CELPIP Reading is honestly one of the hardest sections to improve fast. A lot of students expect their score to jump after learning a few tricks, but Reading usually takes time because it depends a lot on your actual English level, vocabulary, and reading speed. A few things that genuinely help 👇 1. Stop translating every sentence in your head If you translate word by word, you’ll run out of time very quickly. T…
❤8💯5
We got a great comment on the previous task - it really nails the key idea. In reality, many test takers simply forget to do the comparison part of the task. Never skip it. You need to highlight the advantages of your option, but also clearly explain the cons of the other one. Another strong strategy is adding a bit of context that wasn’t given - this shows deeper reasoning. For example: “I know the Iris bouquet l…
❤6👏1
This is your second screen. Maybe you decided to go with something a bit unusual and chose the Venus flytrap. It’s a tough option — your flower costs more, doesn’t smell, and doesn’t look as nice. But you still need to find reasons why your option is better. Imagine you come up with this response: "I really think the Venus Flytrap is the perfect gift for your sister, and let me tell you why. First of all, it's a li…
❤2
Let’s break down Speaking Task 5 today. This one can be challenging 🙌 Here is a sample task: You are helping your friend choose a flower bouquet, so you need to pick one of two options. However, on the next screen, your friend will present their option, and you need to compare and persuade them that your option is better.
❤1😁1
Today I want to share an important update for our learners. As you’ve probably noticed, immigration to Canada is becoming more competitive. Even a CLB 9-10 score combined with a degree is often not enough anymore to reach a strong CRS score for Express Entry 😓 Because of that, we are introducing our first French teacher. He specializes in TCF and TEF preparation and also works with students starting from zero 👌 Ou…
🔥10❤3
It's time to answer the task: 1. Grammar error (subject–verb agreement) ❌ “it increase productivity” “it” is singular → verb must be "increases" ✅ Correct: “it increases productivity” 2. Comma splice (run-on sentence) ❌ “..., also they save time on commuting.” → Two independent clauses joined with just a comma Correct options: ✅ People can focus more and avoid distractions, and they also save time on commuting (use…
❤10
Continuing our conversation on CELPIP Writing. Find 3 mistakes in this paragraph 👇 I believe working from home is better for employees because it increase productivity. People can focus more and avoid distractions, also they save time on commuting. For example, many workers feel happier. Which helps them perform better. Write them in the comments 🙌 I'll post the response in a couple of days in the comments as well …
❤6
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @celpip_pro. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CELPIP Pro” (@celpip_pro), 4,572 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/celpip_pro.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.