Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Ahmad bnshe genetic

@cellbioaplusteam

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

3,353subscribers

-104 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002160701207
TypeChannel
Username@cellbioaplusteam
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/cellbioaplusteam

Growth

3,3533,4573,4056 August 2026 — 3,457 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,454 subscribers10 August 2026 — 3,387 subscribers13 August 2026 — 3,353 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -104. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,337–3,473 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 06:243,353-34
10 Aug 2026, 00:303,387-67
7 Aug 2026, 04:363,454-3
6 Aug 2026, 20:323,457first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
57.6%
avg views ÷ 3,353 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,930
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.10%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 August 2026
Posts held17 (30 July 20261 August 2026)
Views total32,840
Reactions total1,018
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 23:13 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1,018 reactions across 17 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 90.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
92590.9%
🔥504.91%
😢141.38%
🥰121.18%
❤‍🔥100.982%
👏40.393%
🫡20.196%
🤯10.098%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,018reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Aug 2026, 17:03 UTC≈1,310 views126 reactionsread 7 August 2026

السلام عليكم ورحمه الله وبركاته الف الحمد لله عأي نتيجة كانت البعض عامل بشكل ممتاز و البعض وسط و البعض ما حالفو الحظ إن كنت راضي فقول الحمدلله لو ما فضلو ما رضيت و لا فرحت و ان كنت حزين فقول قدّر الله و ما شاء فعل ربنا هو كاتب الأقدار و اقدار ربنا تأتي من حكمتو العظيمة و حكمة ربنا تقتضي الخير المطلق للعبد المؤمن. فاللي صار معك بأذن الله تعالى خير. طمنوني ان شاء الله استفدتوا من التسجيلات ؟ حسيت اكتر شي استفدتوا من

110🔥10😢4🫡2

Signed أحمد بنشي

1 Aug 2026, 09:42 UTC≈1,850 views185 reactionsread 7 August 2026

شكلو الاسئلة حلوة بفضل الله 🤍☺️ الف الحمد لله تعالى على كرمه☺️ اللي تابعوا بأي شي مع القناة شو رأيكم بالملخص الفويسات أو الاتمات او التجميعات؟ استفدتوا منها بامتحان اليوم؟☺️ الحمد لله هالقناة خلال خمس سنوات لليوم كانت دائما تقدم اكتر محتوى منظم للمراجعة باسبوع الوراثة🙏🤍

158🔥13🥰12👏1😢1

Signed أحمد بنشي

1 Aug 2026, 09:17 UTC≈4,760 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

كيف كانت؟!🥰

  1. سهلة☺️46%
  2. وسط🙃39%
  3. صعبة🥲5%
  4. مراقب خارجي14%

The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

9

Signed أحمد بنشي

1 Aug 2026, 04:45 UTC≈1,990 views105 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Voice message

ما تكون متل الملاكم اللي ضل عم يتدرب كل السنة منشان مبارة و لما صار الوقت و شاف الخصم توتر و ما قدر يستعمل قوتو و تدريبو . الخوف سيئ ما تخاف و لا تتوتر اتنفس بعمق و استرخي لما تمسك الورقة اقرأ السؤال و فهمو و حلل الخيارت و اربطا بالسؤال لا تشلف من خلال تحلليلك انت قادر توصل للجواب الصح شوية نصائح بالريكورد اسمعو انت و عم تاكل💙🥀 اتذكرونا السنة الجاية و دلوا رفقاتكن عهالقناة بالبيو و الوراثة و لا تخلو حدا من معارفكون

102😢2🤯1

Signed أحمد بنشي

1 Aug 2026, 02:14 UTC≈1,850 views39 reactionsread 7 August 2026

السلام عليكم ورحمه الله وبركاته لا حدا يروح ما دارس الفصل 14 هي اوراق لأهم افكار الفصل و هي فويس لأهم افكار الفصل و بذكّر مبارح نزلت تصويب ❌❌ عالفويس : Brca 1 Brca2 طفراتها جسدية سائدة و ليست متنحية

34👏3🔥2

Signed أحمد بنشي

1 Aug 2026, 00:38 UTC≈1,560 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

السلام عليكم مسألة صغيرة من عندي لنختبر حالنا 1ما نمط التوريث في هذه الشجرة جسدي سائد جسدي متنحي مرتبط بالجنس سائد مرتبط بالجنس متنحي 2ما النمط الجيني للفرد 2I : Aa aa AA A و C يمكن 3اذا تزوج الفرد 3II من فرد متخالف ألائل فاحتمال ولادة طفل مصاب: 25٪ 50% 75% 0% 4اذا تزوج الفرد 2II من ذكر متخالف ألائل فاحتمال ولادة طفل مصاب: 25٪ 50% 75% 0% 5ما النمط الجيني للفرد 6II Aa AA aa يمكن A و B معا 6اذا تزوج الفرد 4

20

Signed أحمد بنشي

1 Aug 2026, 00:38 UTC≈1,770 views52 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Voice message

ملاحظات كتير كتير كتير كتير كتير كتير كتير هامين للمسألة لازم نسمعن بيغنوا عن سماع فويسات شرح حل المسائل ( بس لازم تسمعوا دورة بري٨ و ٧ الموجودين بالمثبتة) بأكد عأهمية هالتسجيل للمسائل و بضيف عليه ملاحظة : لما يطلع معك التوريث جسدي اياك ثم اياك تستعمل XAXa أو XAY بل بتستعمل AA و Aa و بالعكس لما يطلع التوريث جنسي اياك تستعمل AA أو Aa بل بتستعمل XAXaو XAY و هيك موفقين كثيرا ما تنسونا من الدعاء و انا كمان رح ادعيلكم لا

52

Signed أحمد بنشي

31 Jul 2026, 18:18 UTC≈1,650 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Voice message

اضافي ل 13 فقرة الادوية

13

Signed أحمد بنشي

31 Jul 2026, 18:18 UTC≈1,680 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026
File

https://t.me/cellbioaplusteam/3825

19😢3

Signed أحمد بنشي

31 Jul 2026, 18:18 UTC≈1,770 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Voice message

اضافي للتاسع ( الانسولين)

17

Signed أحمد بنشي

31 Jul 2026, 13:03 UTC≈1,830 views126 reactionsread 7 August 2026

بعرف يوم مانو سهل مريت فيه من قبل كنت حاسس اني ما عم اتذكر بس هالاحساس كان كاذب هدفو بس يوترني بيوما قررت اني ادرس من دون ما فكر شو باقي و من دون ما فكر اذا متذكر او لا استمريت بالدرس لآخر اليوم حتى الصبح لما فقت ضليت عم ادرس انا و عم البس و انا و عم آكل حتى و انا بالباص هيك لقبل الفحص بدقايق حطيت غراضي و توكلت عالله و قلت يا ربي انا ما بستهل شي لكن رحمتك وسعت كلشي ارحمني و آتني ما اريد يا كريم و سميت بالله و بل

112🔥14

Signed أحمد بنشي

31 Jul 2026, 08:09 UTC≈1,770 views92 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Voice message

♦️ توتر ♦️ باقيلي نص المادة ♦️ كيف بتعامل مع اليوم ♦️كيفية دراسة كل فصل بالطريقة اللي تضمن اعلى قدر علامات ♦️ رفع معنويات ☺☺ https://t.me/cellbioaplusteam

87🔥5

Signed أحمد بنشي

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @cellbioaplusteam. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

1 Aug 2026, 09:17 UTCAnonymous Poll1,420 voters approx.

كيف كانت؟!🥰

  1. سهلة☺️46%
  2. وسط🙃39%
  3. صعبة🥲5%
  4. مراقب خارجي14%

The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 1 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 318,627 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ahmad bnshe genetic” (@cellbioaplusteam), 3,353 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cellbioaplusteam.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.