Channel
@celebsUHD
On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Handles named that no longer answer Β· Cite this entry
15,078subscribers
-334 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 10,000β31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002004187267 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @celebsUHD |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/celebsUHD |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Aug 2026, 15:03 | 15,078 | -38 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 13:13 | 15,116 | -36 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 07:54 | 15,152 | -43 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 19:25 | 15,195 | -34 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 13:04 | 15,229 | -26 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 11:44 | 15,255 | -34 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 13:43 | 15,289 | -33 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 10:42 | 15,322 | -40 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 11:31 | 15,362 | -20 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:40 | 15,382 | -30 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:15 | 15,412 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:05 | 15,412 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 10 June 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 25 pagesof Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegramβs own channel header, read 19 August 2026 β not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel β not this channelβs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramβs own rounded chrome, so it carries no β mark.
Friends, I want to speak to you in the most sincere way possible. The website I shared above is trustworthy. It is neither an advertisement nor a paid partnership β it is a personal recommendation from me. I registered myself, completed the verification process, and was able to withdraw the money without any issues. I know that nowadays there are many scams on the internet, so I completely understand the skepticismβ¦
π² I found an interesting option β they give a $2000 bonus that can be withdrawn immediately in a new casino. This is not an advertisement, Iβm just sharing what actually worked for me: 1οΈβ£ https://pragmatic-bets.com/?promo=plinko 2οΈβ£ You register and complete the verification process β 3οΈβ£ The bonus is immediately available for withdrawal πΈ
Only until midnight, 12 a.m. Basic Plan: Full Vertical Edits Channel only for 160/- for 1 month. To join: @allfather69 All plan details: Click here
Rashmika π€€ #celebxshots
Divi Vadthya π κ°α΄ΚΚ α΄α΄ Ιͺα΄ ΙͺΙ΄ α΄Κα΄α΄Ιͺα΄α΄ κ°α΄ΚΚ Κα΄ /4α΄ α΄α΄ Ιͺα΄κ± β‘οΈα΄Κα΄α΄Ιͺα΄α΄ #celebxshots
https://t.me/+MjfT_97fReM0ZmU9
Divi Vadthya π #celebxshots
Divi Vadthya π #celebxshots
Divi Vadthya β‘ #celebxshots
Divi Vadthya π₯ #celebxshots
πΈcelebxshots Premium α΄ α΄Κα΄α΄Ιͺα΄α΄ ΚΙͺΚΚα΄ΚΚ α΄κ° ΚΙͺΙ’Κ-Qα΄α΄ΚΙͺα΄Κ α΄α΄Κα΄ΚΚΙͺα΄Κ α΄α΄Ι΄α΄α΄Ι΄α΄ κ°α΄α΄α΄α΄ΚΙͺΙ΄Ι’: π»Vertical Edits π»4K Scenes π»HD & 4K Quality π»100+ Celebrities Covered β Membership: βΉ220/month α΄Ι΄Κα΄α΄α΄ α΄Κα΄α΄Ιͺα΄α΄ α΄α΄Ι΄α΄α΄Ι΄α΄ α΄Ι΄α΄ α΄α΄α΄α΄κ±κ± κ°α΄α΄α΄Κα΄ α΄α΄Κα΄α΄α΄ κ± α΄κ± α΄Κα΄Κ α΄Κα΄ α΄α΄ α΄ α΄α΄ . To Purchase @Allfather69 More - Plans
Disha Spicy Patani π₯ #celebxshots
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @celebsUHD. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank β 406,681 of 1,550,220entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below β republished posts weigh more than named mentions β and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelβs name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page β a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel β every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched β that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayβs namer to yesterdayβs owner would misattribute it.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@celebsUHD named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handleβs history β see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today β not that anything βdiedβ. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel β we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 August 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βππ¨ππ€π©π¨ π€β (@celebsUHD), 15,078 subscribers as measured 18 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/celebsUHD.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.