Channel
@cdswda
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,462subscribers
+19 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001554839571 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cdswda |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cdswda |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 23:55 | 1,462 | +7 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 08:14 | 1,455 | +12 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:01 | 1,443 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:05 | 1,443 | first reading |
4 posts held, back to 30 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 4 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
52 reactions across 4 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💩 | 29 | 55.8% | |
| ❤ | 23 | 44.2% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 4 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 52reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 4 most recent posts we hold, published 30 June 2026 to 7 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
编号：No.7 信息 城市: 郑州 年龄:18 身高: 163 体重: 100 罩杯: C 职业: 学生 接受度 用口: 🉑 内滋: 🙅🏻♂️ 无套: 🙅🏻♂️ S M: 🙅 异地: 🙅🏻♂️ 过夜:可以 同居: 可以 喷水: 🙅🏻♂️ 后门:🙅 费用: 一个月1.5w 分期: 4-5次 中介费：1888RMB 总结： 一个月可见7-8回，妹子是个M，可以sm，可以3p，绝对人间极品夹子音，刚成年第二天，人工白虎，超级粉，特别特别甜，主任以认证，有问题包赔。 联系方式：@oopp723
💩10❤2
编号：No.6 信息 城市: 郑州 年龄:27 身高: 166 体重: 96 罩杯: B+ 职业: 学生 接受度 用口: 🉑 内滋: 🙅🏻♂️ 无套: 🙅🏻♂️ S M: 🙅 异地: 🙅🏻♂️ 过夜:可以 同居: 可以 喷水: 🙅🏻♂️ 后门:🙅 费用: 一个月2w 分期: 4-5次 中介费：2388RMB 总结： 良家，气质御姐，懂事，身材好，气质大方，本人比照片好看，情绪价值高，会玩，以认证，有问题包赔。 联系方式：@oopp723
💩19❤5
编号：No.5 信息 城市: 郑州 年龄:21 身高: 173 体重: 115 罩杯: C+ 职业: 学生 接受度 用口: 🉑 内滋: 🙅🏻♂️ 无套: 验血后可以商量 S M: 🙅 异地: 🉑 过夜:可以 同居: 可以 喷水: 感觉到了可以 后门:🙅 费用: 每天1k俩天起 分期: 天付 中介费：1888RMB 总结： 价格便宜，天付，BBW，脸蛋漂亮，胸大屁股翘，肤白，绝对极品，可以玩具，妩媚，真极品，喜欢可冲，以认证，有问题包赔。 联系方式：@oopp723
❤12
编号：No.4 信息 城市: 郑州 年龄: 19 身高: 172 体重: 92 罩杯: A+ 职业: 学生 接受度 用口: 🉑 内滋: 🙅🏻♂️ 无套: 🙅🏻♂️ S M: 🙅 异地: 🙅🏻♂️ 过夜:可以 同居: 可以 喷水: 🙅 后门:🙅 费用: 25k/月 分期: 3期 中介费：2888RMB 总结： 长期见面老板自己聊见几次，大概说了一下6-8次，舞蹈生，冷白皮，可以喝酒，超级会玩，无纹身，不事脾气好，配合度高，可过夜，手慢无，细支结硕果！ 联系方式：@oopp723
❤4
Showing the 4 most recent of 4 posts we hold for @cdswda. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 829,572 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“郑州太狼婚介” (@cdswda), 1,462 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cdswda.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.