Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for γ€ηΊ¦πŸ’‹ζˆιƒ½γ€‘

Supergroup

γ€ηΊ¦πŸ’‹ζˆιƒ½γ€‘

@cd_vip

Has discussion group

On this record: Topic Β· Growth Β· Engagement Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry

1,599members

+57 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

28 online right now

Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001746827401
TypeSupergroup
Username@cd_vip
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 β€” estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded27 September 2026
Last confirmed live12 October 2026
Measurements held17
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/cd_vip

Topic

Other / unclassifiable β€” a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 27 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 86% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured β€” it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,5281,5991,563.510 August 2026 β€” 1,542 members10 August 2026 β€” 1,540 members14 August 2026 β€” 1,539 members17 August 2026 β€” 1,540 members20 August 2026 β€” 1,552 members24 August 2026 β€” 1,549 members27 August 2026 β€” 1,548 members30 August 2026 β€” 1,545 members2 September 2026 β€” 1,540 members6 September 2026 β€” 1,538 members11 September 2026 β€” 1,531 members14 September 2026 β€” 1,528 members18 September 2026 β€” 1,544 members27 September 2026 β€” 1,544 members27 September 2026 β€” 1,582 members5 October 2026 β€” 1,592 members12 October 2026 β€” 1,599 members10 August 202612 October 2026
17 measurements spanning 63 days, net +57. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean β€œno change observed”, never β€œinterpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,517–1,610 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β€” every members count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)MembersChange
12 Oct 2026, 08:591,599+7
5 Oct 2026, 13:201,592+10
27 Sept 2026, 22:191,582+38
27 Sept 2026, 03:071,544no change
18 Sept 2026, 15:001,544+16
14 Sept 2026, 16:371,528-3
11 Sept 2026, 13:001,531-7
6 Sept 2026, 18:151,538-2
2 Sept 2026, 16:451,540-5
30 Aug 2026, 13:461,545-3
27 Aug 2026, 05:541,548-1
24 Aug 2026, 01:141,549-3
20 Aug 2026, 04:151,552+12
17 Aug 2026, 13:531,540+1
14 Aug 2026, 14:071,539-1
10 Aug 2026, 21:041,540-2
10 Aug 2026, 16:471,542first reading

Engagement

Posts not read yet. This entry is on the register from its profile alone; the post reader has not reached it. Engagement figures appear here once posts have actually been measured β€” we do not publish a rate before we have the readings behind it.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels β€” every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched β€” that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β€” the β€œNamed by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 October 2026 β€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

β€œγ€ηΊ¦πŸ’‹ζˆιƒ½γ€‘β€ (@cd_vip), 1,599 members as measured 12 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cd_vip.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.