Channel
@ccfafafafa
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
4,714subscribers
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002804607913 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ccfafafafa |
| Description | 有一种黑是台子黑 还有一种黑是代理黑 收集/转接网友曝光， 请理性浏览判断。 曝光/澄清 @jiugerbot 我们代理的平台可能功能、福利不如别人，但它真实/正规 那些把台子做的花里胡哨的反倒是失去了游戏的初心。 说实话，真正的赌博一张台子足矣，太多反倒是迷乱了自己，华丽不过是保护色，游戏本身最终还是要回归到台面的真诚。 我们的平台 @aomen0808 #曝光 #黑台 #杀猪台 #华人 #赌场 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 1 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ccfafafafa |
Growth history is still building. We hold one measurement for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 13:32 | 4,714 | first reading |
4 posts held, back to 11 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 4 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 4 (11 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 147 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Aug 2026, 13:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
#赢赢娱乐 十年老赌狗第一次曝光平台，本人地址TFfnTmD4qdeMiRqdwUBezb1XVNZpHy1RCB随便去查，这只是最近复赌新搞的地址用了一个月，事件起因本人在 #赢赢娱乐 平台连续玩了一个月，中间有输有赢一切都没问题，最近几天每天赢钱，今天充值1000输了，后面又充了1000打到6000提现被拒绝，客服告诉我需要审核48小时，我想请问哪个正规的平台需要审核48个小时？我也是在东南亚混的，什么平台我都赌过，赌了十几年输了也有上千万了，不要拿话术敷衍我没有意义，#赢赢娱乐 网址 https://8188 VIP 最后说一句如果赢赢害怕别人赢钱，我觉得可以直接关盘了，下面是客服聊天记录，还有我的账号记录
#开元棋牌 #杀猪台 #黑款 #黑平台 这个招商当时和我说70%佣金，五个有效就可以预支五成，当时因为自己做NBA和CBA推单很忙就没有做，六月底的时候赛季结束了忙完了就开始考虑做这个。一开始都还好有一次有个会员连续中了好几场比赛没出款，我给他推的比赛是WNBA和欧协联这种大赛，然后就说这个会员在im体育和fb体育买低赔率电子比赛，违规。 后面我给玩家私自补了没出款的钱，他当时确实也给我报销了渠道费，没亏什么赚一百多块钱，后面五个有效够了，我要去预支佣金，就说我这个代理线是团队刷子线，预支不了，二号正常结算，今天到了发佣金的时候，我这条线没上啥人4900多负盈利，按照亚博的来算就是4900×70%=3430，结果我一看他的报表东扣西扣，实际佣金只有1200多，然后提交上去，结果又说我这个是刷子线，结算不了，结果就是一分不给。#开元棋牌 真牛逼，黑完玩家黑代理，还想我一直拉我这边的大哥来玩，这种平台大家避而远之，还是不要贪图高…
#8T娱乐 #杀猪台 #黑款 #黑平台 我 7 月才开始合营拉新，结算时却被平台以 6 月无关的 “负业绩” 为由，扣光全部应得佣金。客服亲口承认 6 月会员不参与当期活动，结算时却双标耍赖，拿老数据抹掉新收入。辛苦跑业务换来随意克扣，毫无契约与信誉可言。 这样出尔反尔、乱扣款项的平台，谁还敢继续合作？请大家擦亮眼睛，远离 #8T娱乐，合作前务必把结算规则白纸黑字确认清楚！
#财神娱乐 #杀猪台 #黑款 #黑平台 事情是这样的，有推广在飞机上给我发信息，说首充送彩金。我就选择了首冲300U。然后打真人视讯，盈利了不到300U，折合成人民币是3865.5结果就黑了,不出款了，让我下载软件找专员解决问题。这个是个杀猪盘。大家注意这个黑平台.财神娱乐，大家注意这个垃圾。u1.top
Showing the 4 most recent of 4 posts we hold for @ccfafafafa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,430,972 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“TG曝光|警惕！网络杀台曝光 黑台全网曝光” (@ccfafafafa), 4,714 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ccfafafafa.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.