Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

午夜福利-精选AV 麻豆 剧情 国产 裸聊 日韩 无码 @CCCC3

@cccc3

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

50,250subscribers

+35,278 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001528140545
TypeChannel
Username@cccc3
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 31 January 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/cccc3

Growth

14,97250,25032,6119 August 2026 — 14,972 subscribers10 August 2026 — 50,172 subscribers11 August 2026 — 50,174 subscribers11 August 2026 — 50,198 subscribers12 August 2026 — 50,250 subscribers9 August 202612 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 3 days, net +35,278. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,680–55,542 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 23:5850,250+52
11 Aug 2026, 21:5650,198+24
11 Aug 2026, 01:0650,174+2
10 Aug 2026, 02:2850,172+35,200
9 Aug 2026, 16:0214,972first reading

Engagement

27 posts held, back to 14 June 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.06%
avg views ÷ 50,250 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,030
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.112%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 27 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 12 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held27 (14 June 202412 August 2026)
Views total12,395
Reactions total7
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 19:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
55s
Average length
11s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

7 reactions across 7 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
7100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 27 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 14 June 2024 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 14:54 UTC168 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

#裸聊 #萝莉 #白虎 #自慰 清纯甜美的萝裙少女躲在房间背着父母偷偷和金主爸爸视频裸聊,童颜巨乳清瘦白嫩,纤细美腿配上白丝对着镜头扣弄着粉嫩白虎美穴,简直完美。 👉点击此处观看完整资源。

1

12 Aug 2026, 08:20 UTC≈1,910 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

BLK-685 没大没小的巨乳辣妹青梅,保健室诱我邻床。翘课整日狂打炮,榨干精液至淋漓! #日韩 #新井里真 #制服 #学校 #校服 #中出 👉点击此处观看完整资源。

1

12 Aug 2026, 08:18 UTC344 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

#裸聊 #少妇 #爆乳 #母狗 漂亮少妇穿着蕾丝睡衣和金主爸爸视频聊骚,掏出粉嫩的圆润大奶子隔空喂奶,躺在床上翘起双腿求对面的爸爸干她,肆意发骚,诱惑十足。 👉点击此处观看完整资源。

1

12 Aug 2026, 08:17 UTC306 views0 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

#直播 #爆乳 #丝袜 #母狗 极品反差发骚露脸母狗护士,大屌跳蛋肆意自慰,感受着极致快感,狠狠地主动骑乘上来插入骚穴,爽到淫水白浆喷不停。 👉点击此处观看完整资源。

12 Aug 2026, 08:15 UTC261 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

#直播 #精神小妹 #骑乘 #母狗 大奶骚脸精神小妹直播自慰抠逼做爱,烂逼臭屁眼坐脸视角,女上骑乘工具甩奶上下抽插,骚气十足。 👉点击此处观看完整资源。

1

11 Aug 2026, 09:12 UTC603 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

#直播 #御姐 #丝袜 #自慰 高颜值长腿御姐真空开档丝袜用震动棒和假屌疯狂自慰呻吟诱惑十足骚穴淫水狂流,骚气十足。 👉点击此处观看完整资源。

1

11 Aug 2026, 09:11 UTC602 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

#直播 #露出 #御姐 #自慰 高颜值长腿御姐寂寞难耐,户外跳蛋全裸激情自慰高潮喷水淫荡不堪。 👉点击此处观看完整资源。

1

11 Aug 2026, 09:09 UTC≈2,070 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

#国产 #麻豆 #3P #足交 SM姐妹花的超绝品性爱盛宴 S姐姐强制榨精调教M妹妹奴性讨好主人。 姐妹花各有千秋但是背后都淫荡的一批,不断反差发烧侍奉主人,带来不一样的感觉,那么你是喜欢姐姐的S还是妹妹的M呢? 👉点击此处观看完整资源。

1

11 Aug 2026, 09:06 UTC≈2,010 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

#素人 #粉鲍 #国产 绝美粉鲍足疗妹被舌尖舔到喷水,嫩穴一张一合狂吸肉棒! 👉点击此处观看完整资源。

11 Aug 2026, 08:49 UTC461 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

HMN-797 暑假回乡,村长淫威下,纯洁小穴被迫献祭。一週内,处女深处被一次次粗暴贯穿、内射,尽是淫乱乡俗… #日韩 #仓本蓳 #潮吹 #凌辱 #群交 #少女 👉点击此处观看完整资源。

11 Aug 2026, 08:44 UTC≈1,830 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

HMN-795 男友初夜将近,为伪装熟女。校花私会大叔,任肉棒无套内射操开深处,只为那夜狂欢。 #日韩 #北冈果林 #中出 #口交 #制服 #校服 👉点击此处观看完整资源。

11 Aug 2026, 08:34 UTC≈1,830 viewsread 12 August 2026

♾【看片导航 全类型选择】 全网类型最全 种类最多 关注频道不迷路 #国产 #日韩 #裸聊 #欧美 #捷克街头搭讪 #内射 #调教 #中出 #中文字幕 #母狗 #直播 #自慰 #人妻 #爆乳 #白虎 点击相对应的蓝色字体 可观看对应类型视频

Signed 瓜王 【南宫集团】

Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @cccc3. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,142,139 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“午夜福利-精选AV 麻豆 剧情 国产 裸聊 日韩 无码 @CCCC3” (@cccc3), 50,250 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cccc3.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.