Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

𝚌𝚊𝚕𝚕𝚒𝚜𝚝𝚘𝚘

@ccallisstoo

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

7,116subscribers

-12 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001660871020
TypeChannel
Username@ccallisstoo
Description💭Черновик моего творчества анон: @callistoobot tt: bbttssmoon tg: @sashavrodekak
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ccallisstoo

Growth

7,1167,1287,1227 August 2026 — 7,128 subscribers8 August 2026 — 7,128 subscribers11 August 2026 — 7,116 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 4 days, net -12. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,114–7,130 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 21:087,116-12
8 Aug 2026, 17:377,128no change
7 Aug 2026, 22:337,128first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 30 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
69.0%
avg views ÷ 7,116 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,910
1 post measured
Reaction rate
15.9%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 July 2026
Posts held17 (30 December 202517 July 2026)
Views total4,910
Reactions total783
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 02:23 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
342
Videos
454
Links
92

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
13m 08s
Average length
1m 12s

Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

18,728 reactions across 17 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52174863580497573315,20327.8%
custom 53572336331050523063,38318.1%
custom 52202313231882369352,95315.8%
custom 53596782511805249792,22711.9%
custom 52200487097687429741,8619.94%
custom 52202337884994683791,3227.06%
custom 53596898347073235401,0115.40%
custom 53595763144267217367684.10%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 18,728reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 30 December 2025 to 17 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
195
across the posts below
Posts paid on
17
of 17 we hold a reading for · 100%
Most on one post
35
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ccallisstoo. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 December 2025 to 17 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

17 Jul 2026, 08:47 UTC≈4,910 views783 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Video

🤩🤩🤩🤩⭐️

custom 5220048709768742974491custom 5220231323188236935150custom 5217486358049757331114custom 522023378849946837928

11 Jul 2026, 17:44 UTC≈16,700 views1,221 reactions12 Starsread 12 August 2026
Video

Тэхена вполне устраивает его жизнь — тихая и размеренная. Он любит и ценит свое одиночество. Ему хватает двух вечеров в месяц, чтобы пообщаться с людьми, когда он выступает в местном баре. Но теперь, с появлением нового соседа, он все чаще ловит себя на мыслях, что ему интересно, что играет у того в наушниках, как зовут его собаку, что он смотрит по ночам, когда слышно его приглушенный смех через стену, и почему ков

custom 5217486358049757331755custom 5220231323188236935250custom 5220048709768742974187custom 522023378849946837929

1 Jul 2026, 13:05 UTC≈8,150 views865 reactions4 Starsread 12 August 2026
Video

Вот и закончился наш отпуск с космо🌧 (на самом деле вернулись мы еще 20-го, но мне нужно было время прийти в себя) Мы отлично отдохнули в Сеуле, съездили на концерт бтс в Пусане(это событие до сих пор ощущается как сон при температуре 40), наслаждались природой Чеджу и с грустинкой тусили остаток дней в Шанхае📍 Принесла вам небольшой 🤩🤩🤩🤩отчёт нашего путешествия! Официально заявляю, что мои каникулы закончились и я

custom 5217486358049757331537custom 5220231323188236935182custom 5220233788499468379128custom 522004870976874297418

18 May 2026, 13:23 UTC≈11,900 views903 reactions13 Starsread 12 August 2026

Привет🐱 Пришла сказать, что мне очень стыдно, что я бессовестно пропадаю и не приношу вам новые видео уже больше месяца, но я еле нахожу время, чтобы просто поспать 😐 Много работаю, а в редкие выходные решаю кучу вопросов и тоже работаю. Послезавтра набор в приват. Я очень хотела вам до него принести хоть что-нибудь, но я, конечно же, не успеваю😐 Скорее всего, те, кто вступит в него в этот раз, будут тусить там два

custom 5220048709768742974573custom 5220231323188236935179custom 5217486358049757331131custom 522023378849946837920

13 Apr 2026, 06:14 UTC≈13,500 views1,075 reactions28 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🔤 🔤🔤 🩹🩹25🩹🩹 С днём рождения меня! Кажется, я впервые по‑настоящему переосмысливаю полностью свою жизнь и подвожу итоги (звучит так, будто собралась выйти в окно🤪) Если говорить без лишней воды, то оглядываясь назад, я понимаю: мне нравится то, где я сейчас. Пусть по пути и пришлось много раз спотыкаться, менять направление, но именно это все и привело меня в мое сегодняшнее «сейчас». Я благодарна тому, что у меня ес

custom 5217486358049757331666custom 5220231323188236935233custom 5220048709768742974162custom 522023378849946837914

10 Apr 2026, 13:53 UTC≈21,000 views1,167 reactions7 Starsread 12 August 2026
Video

— Давно не виделись, липучка. — Прошло четыре года с выпуска, а ты все еще смущаешься смотреть мне в глаза, Чонгук.

custom 5220231323188236935725custom 5217486358049757331228custom 5220233788499468379183custom 522004870976874297431

7 Apr 2026, 18:32 UTC≈18,900 views1,014 reactions8 Starsread 12 August 2026
Video

🤩 🤍🤍🤍🤩🤩🤩🤩🤍🤍🤍 Суд Великой Триады — высший трибунал над изгнанниками небес. Для падших есть лишь три исхода: перерождение в смертной плоти, вечные муки ада или полное истребление бессмертной души.

custom 5217486358049757331611custom 5220233788499468379194custom 5220231323188236935162custom 522004870976874297447

4 Apr 2026, 10:41 UTC≈17,800 views1,200 reactions35 Starsread 12 August 2026
Video

— Ну что, — сказал он, выпуская сигаретный дым в ночное небо, — куда мы теперь? Предпочтения есть? — Любая страна, где нет твоих бывших коллег и моего досье, — мужчина пожал плечами. — То есть… половина планеты отпадает. Они сидели на капоте машины на обочине заброшенной дороги. Два человека, которые не должны были выжить, не должны были быть вместе и уж точно не должны были смеяться. Но всё-таки смеялись. — Тогда

custom 5220231323188236935756custom 5217486358049757331230custom 5220233788499468379177custom 522004870976874297437

1 Mar 2026, 17:13 UTC≈29,400 views1,811 reactions20 Starsread 12 August 2026
Video

На губах Чонгука расцветает полуулыбка. — То, что ты считаешь своими «проблемами» или комплексами, я считаю достоинствами. Мне это нравится. — Моя... странная внешность... — уже было начинает Тэхён, но Чонгук уверенно перебивает: — Невообразимое чудо. Бьянко 🤍🤍🤍

custom 52174863580497573311,110custom 5220233788499468379358custom 5220048709768742974289custom 522023132318823693554

14 Feb 2026, 12:36 UTC≈18,600 views1,300 reactions5 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Happy Valentine’s Day 💔

custom 5217486358049757331821custom 5220231323188236935262custom 5220233788499468379191custom 522004870976874297426

6 Feb 2026, 19:10 UTC≈21,200 views1,197 reactions7 Starsread 12 August 2026
Video

— Что бы ты выбрал — настоящую любовь или много-много денег? Хосок замер. Очередной вопрос племянницы в бесконечной игре «или» ударил в него, выбив весь воздух из лёгких. Он знает ответ — ведь однажды уже сделал этот выбор.

custom 5357233633105052306618custom 5359678251180524979330custom 5359689834707323540217custom 535957631442672173632

6 Feb 2026, 19:02 UTC≈13,900 views468 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026

Не спите? Похрустим стеклом?🐈

custom 5359576314426721736272custom 5359678251180524979115custom 535723363310505230660custom 535968983470732354021

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @ccallisstoo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 412,851 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝚌𝚊𝚕𝚕𝚒𝚜𝚝𝚘𝚘” (@ccallisstoo), 7,116 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ccallisstoo.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.